Effects of a short burst of gait training with body weight-supported treadmill training for a person with chronic stroke: A single-subject study

REFERENCES

• American Thoracic Society 2002 American Thoracic Society statement: Guidelines for the six-minute walk test. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 166: 111–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backman CL, Harris SR, Chisholm JAM, Monette AD 1997 Single-subject research in rehabilitation: A review of studies using AB, withdrawal, multiple baseline, and alternating treatments designs. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 78: 1145–1153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom M, Fischer J, Orme JG 2006 Evaluating Practice: Guidelines for the Accountable Professional, 5th edn. Boston, Allyn and Bacon
   Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW, Andrews AW, Smith MB 1988 Rehabilitation goals of patients with hemiplegia. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 11: 181–183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosseau L, Wells GA, Finestone HM, Egan M, Dubouloz CJ, Graham I, Casimiro L, Robinson VA, Bilodeau M, McGowan J, Teasell R, Desrosiers J, Barreca S, Laferrière L, Fung J, Corriveau H, Gubitz G, Sharma MUS, Khadilkar A, Phillips K, Jean N, Lamothe C, Milne S, Sarnecka J 2006 Ottawa panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for post-stroke rehabilitation. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 13: 1–269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camarri B, Eastwood PR, Cecins NM, Thompson PJ, Jenkins S 2006 Six minute walk distance in healthy subjects aged 55–75 years. Respiratory Medicine 100: 658–665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Bode RK, Lai SM, Perera S 2003 Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The stroke impact scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 84: 950–963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Richards L, Wallace D, Stoker-Yates J, Pohl P, Luchies C, Ogle A, Studenski S 1998 A randomized, controlled pilot study of a home-based exercise program for individuals with mild and moderate stroke. Stroke 29: 2055–2060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ 1999 The stroke impact scale version 2.0: Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke 30: 2131–2140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards B, O'Connell B 2003 Internal consistency and validity of the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0 (SIS 2.0) and SIS-16 in an Australian sample. Quality of Life Research 12: 1127–1135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flansbjer UB, Holmback AM, Downham D, Patten C, Lexell J 2005 Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 37: 75–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz SL, Pittman AL, Robinson AC, Orton SC, Rivers ED 2007 An intense intervention for improving gait, balance, and mobility for individuals with chronic stroke: A pilot study. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy 31: 71–76
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fulk GD, Echternach JL, Nof L, O'Sullivan S 2008 Clinometric properties of the six-minute walk test in individuals undergoing rehabilitation poststroke. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 24: 195–204
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green J, Forster A, Young J 2002 Reliability of gait speed measured by a timed walking test in patients one year after stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 16: 306–314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassid E, Rose D, Commisarow J, Guttry M, Dobkin BH 1997 Improved gait symmetry in hemiparetic stroke patients induced during body weight-supported treadmill stepping. Journal of Neurologic Rehabilitation 11: 21–26
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS 1995 Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: The Copenhagen stroke study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 76: 27–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan LR, Hickman RR, Harris SR, Heriza CB 2008 Single-subject research design: Recommendations for levels of evidence and quality rating. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 50: 99–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahler DA, Froelicher VF, York TD, Miller NH 1995 ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 5th edn. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins
   Google Scholar
• Oberg T, Karsznia A, Oberg K 1993 Basic gait parameters: Reference data for normal subjects, 10–79 years of age. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 30: 210–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski SA 2006 Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 54: 743–749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK, Mulroy SJ 1995 Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke 26: 982–989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer P, Behrman AL, Duncan PW, Spigel P, Saracino D, Martin J, Fox E, Thigpen M, Kautz SA 2007 Effects of stroke severity and training duration on locomotor recovery after stroke: A pilot study. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 21: 137–151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl M, Mehrholz J, Ritschel C, Rückriem S 2002 Speed-dependent treadmill training in ambulatory hemiparetic stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Stroke 33: 553–558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provost B, Dieruf K, Burtner PA, Phillips JP, Bernitsky-Beddingfield A, Sullivan KJ, Bowen CA, Toser L 2007 Endurance and gait in children with cerebral palsy after intensive body weight-supported treadmill training. Pediatric Physical Therapy 19: 2–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rossier P, Wade DT 2001 Validity and reliability comparison of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 82: 9–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salbach NM, Mayo NE, Higgins J, Ahmed S, Finch LE, Richards CL 2001 Responsiveness and predictability of gait speed and other disability measures in acute stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 82: 1204–1212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid A, Duncan PW, Studenski S, Lai SM, Richards L, Perera S, Wu SS 2007 Improvements in speed-based gait classifications are meaningful. Stroke 38: 2096–2100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan KJ, Brown DA, Klassen T, Mulroy S, Ge T, Azen SP, Winstein CJ 2007 Effects of task-specific locomotor and strength training in adults who were ambulatory after stroke: Results of the STEPS randomized clinical trial. Physical Therapy 87: 1580–1602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan KJ, Knowlton BJ, Dobkin BH 2002 Step training with body weight support: Effect of treadmill speed and practice paradigms on poststroke locomotor recovery. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 83: 683–691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Schroeder HP, Coutts RD, Lyden PD, Billings Jr E, Nickel VL 1995 Gait parameters following stroke: A practical assessment. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 32: 25–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D, Giuliani C, Light KE, Nichols-Larsen D 2006 Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: The EXCITE randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 296: 2095–2104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan S, Ottenbacher KJ 2001 Single subject research designs for disability research. Disability and Rehabilitation 23: 1–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar