Effectiveness and outcomes of brace treatment: A systematic review

REFERENCES

• Allington NJ, Bowen JR 1996 Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Treatment with the Wilmington brace. A comparison of full-time and part-time use. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Am 78: 1056–1062
   Google Scholar
• Andersen MO, Christensen SB, Thomsen K 2006 Outcome at 10 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 31: 350–354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angevine PD, Deutsch H 2008 Idiopathic scoliosis. Neurosurgery 63: A86–A93
   Google Scholar
• Asher MA, Burton DC 2006 Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Natural history and long term treatment effects 2006. Scoliosis 1: 2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bunge EM, Juttmann RE, de Kleuver M, van Biezen FC, de Koning HJ; NESCIO group 2007 Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after treatment: Short-term effects after brace or surgical treatment. European Spine Journal 16: 83–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunnell WP 1986 The natural history of idiopathic scoliosis before skeletal maturity. Spine 11: 773–776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb JR 1948 Outline for the study of scoliosis. In: Edwards JW (ed), AAOS, Instructional Course Lectures, vol 5, pp 261–275 Ann Arbor, The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons
   Google Scholar
• Danielsson AJ, Hasserius R, Ohlin A, Nachemson AL 2007 A prospective study of brace treatment versus observation alone in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A follow-up mean of 16 years after maturity. Spine 32: 2198–2207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL 2001a Radiologic findings and curve progression 22 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Comparison of brace and surgical treatment with matching control group of straight individuals. Spine 26: 516–525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL 2001b Childbearing, curve progression, and sexual function in women 22 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A case-control study. Spine 26: 1449–1456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielsson AJ, Romberg K, Nachemson AL 2006 Spinal range of motion, muscle endurance, and back pain and function at least 20 years after fusion or brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A case-control study. Spine 31: 275–283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielsson AJ, Wiklund I, Pehrsson K, Nachemson AL 2001 Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. European Spine Journal 10: 278–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Boer WA, Anderson PG, v Limbeek J, Kooijman MA 1999 Treatment of idiopathic scoliosis with side-shift therapy: An initial comparison with a brace treatment historical cohort. European Spine Journal 8: 406–410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emans JB, Kaelin A, Bancel P 1986 The Boston Brace system for idiopathic scoliosis: Follow up in 295 patients. Spine 11: 792–801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fällström K, Cochran T, Nachemson A 1986 Long-term effects on personality development in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Influence of type of treatment. Spine 11: 756–758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes P, Weinstein SL 2007 Natural history of early onset scoliosis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Am 89 (suppl 1): 21–33
   Google Scholar
• Fisher DA, Rapp GF, Emkes M 1987 Idiopathic scoliosis: Transcutaneous muscle stimulation versus the Milwaukee brace. Spine 12: 987–991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Focarile FA, Bonaldi A, Giarolo MA, Ferrari U, Zilioli E, Ottaviani C 1991 Effectiveness of nonsurgical treatment for idiopathic scoliosis. Overview of available evidence. Spine 16: 395–401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg CJ, Dowling FE, Hall JE, Emans JB 1993 A statistical comparison between natural history of idiopathic scoliosis and brace treatment in skeletally immature adolescent girls. Spine 18: 902–908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green NE 1986 Part-time bracing of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Am 68: 738–743
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grivas TB, Vasiliadis E, Mihas C, Savvidou O 2007 The effect of growth on the correlation between the spinal and rib cage deformity: Implications on idiopathic scoliosis pathogenesis. Scoliosis 2: 11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grivas TB, Vasiliadis E, Mouzakis V, Mihas C, Koufopoulos G 2006 Association between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis prevalence and age at menarche in different geographic latitudes. Scoliosis 1: 9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grivas TB, Vasiliadis ES, Rodopoulos G, Kovanis I 2008 School screening as a research tool in epidemiology, natural history and aetiology of idiopathic scoliosis. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 135: 84–93
   Google Scholar
• Gupta P, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH 1998 Incidence of neural axis abnormalities in infantile and juvenile patients with spinal deformity. Is a magnetic resonance image screening necessary? Spine 23: 206–210
   Google Scholar
• Helenious I, Remes V, Yrjonen T, Ylikoski M, Schlenzka D, Helenious M, Poussa M 2005 Does gender affect outcome of surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 30: 462–467
   Google Scholar
• Helfenstein A, Lankes M, Ohlert K, Varoga D, Hahne HJ, Ulrich W, Hassenpflug J 2006 The objective determination of compliance in treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with spinal orthoses. Spine 31: 339–344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonasson-Rajala E, Josefsson E, Lundberg B 1984 Boston thoracic brace in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis: Initial correction. Clinical Orthopaedics 183: 37–41
   Google Scholar
• Kahanovitz N, Snow B, Pinter I 1984 The comparative results of psychologic testing in scoliosis patients treated with electrical stimulation or bracing. Spine 9: 442–444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahanovitz N, Weiser S 1989 The psychological impact of idiopathic scoliosis on the adolescent female. A preliminary multi-center study. Spine 14: 483–485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karol LA, Johnston CE, Brown RH 1993 Progression of the curve in boys who have idiopathic scoliosis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Am 75: 1804–1810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz DE, Durrani AA 2001 Factors that influence outcome in bracing large curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 26: 2354–2361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz DE, Richards BS, Browne RH, Herring JA 1997 A comparison between the Boston brace and the Charleston bending brace in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 22: 1302–1312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Blanco JS, Widmann RF 2009 Update on the management of idiopathic scoliosis. Current Opinion in Pediatrics 21: 55–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurnen EL, Tupper JW, Mullen MP 1983 The Boston brace in thoracic scoliosis. A preliminary report. Spine 8: 388–395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonstein JE, Carlson JM 1984 The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Am 66: 1061–1071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonstein JE, Winter RB 1994 The Milwaukee brace for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A review of one thousand and twenty patients. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Am 76: 1207–1221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou E, Hill D, Raso J 2008 Brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 135: 265–273
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mak I, Lou E, Raso JV, Hill DL, Parent E, Mahood JK, Moreau MJ, Hedden D 2008 The effect of time on qualitative compliance in brace treatment for AIS. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 32: 136–144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellin G, Harkonen H, Poussa M 1988 Spinal mobility and posture and their correlations with growth velocity in structurally normal boys and girls aged 13 to 14. Spine 13: 152–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachemson AL, Peterson LE 1995 Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective, controlled study based on data from the Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Am 77: 815–822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash CL, Moe JH 1969 A study of vertebral rotation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Am 51: 223–229
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Negrini S, Atanasio S, Negrini F, Zaina F, Marcini G 2008 The Sforzesco brace can replace cast in the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A controlled prospective cohort study. Scoliosis 3: 5
   Google Scholar
• Negrini S, Grivas TB, Kotwicki T, Rigo M, Zaina F 2009 Standards of management of idiopathic scoliosis with corrective braces in everyday clinics and in clinical research: SOSORT Consensus 2008. Scoliosis 4: 2
   Google Scholar
• Nissinen M, Heliovaara M, Ylikoski M, Poussa M 1993 Trunk asymmetry and screening for scoliosis: A longitudinal cohort study of pubertal schoolchildren. Acta Paediatrica 82: 77–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill PJ, Karol LA, Schindle MK, Elerson EE, Brintzenhofeszoc KM, Katz DE, Farmer KW, Sponseller PD 2005 Decreased orthotic effectiveness in overweight patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Am 87: 1069–1074
   Google Scholar
• Pehrsson K, Danielsson A, Nachemson A 2001 Pulmonary function in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A 25 year follow up after surgery or start of brace treatment. Thorax 56: 388–393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltonen J, Poussa M, Ylikoski M 1988 Three year results of bracing in scoliosis. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 59: 487–490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson LE, Nachemson AL 1995 Prediction of progression of the curve in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of moderate severity: Logistic regression analysis based on the data from the brace study of the scoliosis research society. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Am 77: 823–827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham VM, Houlliez A, Carpentier A, Herbaux B, Schill A, Thevenon A 2008 Determination of the influence of the Chêneau brace on quality of life for adolescent with idiopathic scoliosis. Annales de Readaptation et de Medecine Physique 51: 3–8
   Google Scholar
• Richards SB, Bernstein RM, D'Amato CR, Thompson GH 2005 Standardization of criteria for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace studies. SRS Committee on bracing and nonoperative management. Spine 30: 2068–2075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigo M 2003 Radiologiccal and cosmetic improvement 2 years after brace wearing—A case report. Pediatric Rehabilitation 6: 195–199
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rigo M, Negrini S, Weiss HR, Grivas TB, Maruyama T, Kotwicki T 2006 SOSORT concensus paper on brace action: TLSO biomechanics of correction (investigating the rationale for force vector selection). Scoliosis 1: 11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rigo M, Reiter C, Weiss HR 2003 Effect of conservative management on the prevalence of surgery in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Pediatric Rehabilitation 6: 209–214
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roemmich JN, Clark PA, Lusk M, Friel A, Weltman A, Epstein LH, Rogol AD 2002 Pubertal alteration in growth and body composition. VI Pubertal insulin resistance: Relation to adiposity, body fat distribution and hormonal release. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 26: 701–709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe DE, Bernstein SM, Riddick MF, Adler F, Emans JB, Gardner-Bonneau D 1997 A meta-analysis of the efficacy of non-operative treatment for idiopathic scoliosis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Am 79: 664–674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sucato DJ, Hedequist D, Karol LA 2004 Operative correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in male patients. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Am 86: 2005–2014
   Google Scholar
• Timgren J, Soinila S 2006 Reversible pelvic asymmetry: An overlooked syndrome manifesting as scoliosis apparent leg-length difference and neurologic symptoms. Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics 29: 561–565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson GH, Richards BS 2008 Inclusion and assessment criteria for conservative scoliosis treatment. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 135: 157–163
   Google Scholar
• Ugwonali OF, Lomas G, Choe JC, Hyman JE, Lee FY, Vitale MG, Roye DP Jr 2004 Effect of bracing on the quality of life of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Journal 4: 254–260
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L 2003 Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine 28: 1290–1299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker AP, Dickson RA 1984 School screening and pelvic tilt scoliosis. Lancet 2: 152–153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Qiu Y, Zhu, Ma Z, Xia C, Zhu FZ 2007 Histomorphological study of the spinal growth plates from the convex side and the concave side in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2: 19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weigert KP, Nygaard LM, Christensen FB, Hansen ES, Bünger C 2006 Outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after brace treatment and surgery assessed by means of the Scoliosis Research Society Instrument 24. European Spine Journal 15: 1108–1117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein SL 2001 Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Natural history. In: Weinstein SL (ed), The Pediatric Spine: Principles and Practice, 2nd ed, pp 355–369. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
   Google Scholar
• Weiss HR 2006 Clinical improvement and radiological progression in a girl with early onset scoliosis (EOS) treated conservatively—A case report. Scoliosis 1: 13
   Google Scholar
• Weiss HR, Negrini S, Rigo M, Kotwicki T, Hawes MC, Grivas TB, Maruyama T, Landauer F 2006 Indications for conservative management of scoliosis (guidelines) Scoliosis 1: 5
   Google Scholar
• Weiss HR, Rigo M 2008 The Cheneau concept of bracing—Actual standards. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 135: 291–302
   Google Scholar
• Weiss HR, Rigo M 2010 Expert driven Cheneau applications—Description and results. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice (In press)
   Google Scholar
• Weiss HR, Weiss G, Schaar HJ 2003 Incidence of surgery in conservatively treated patients with scoliosis. Pediatric Rehabilitation 6: 111–118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiley JW, Thompson JD, Mitchell TM, Smith BG, Banta JV 2000 Effectiveness of the Boston brace in treatment of large curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 25: 2326–2332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong MS, Liu WC 2003 Critical review on non-operative management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 27: 242–253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong MS, Mak AF, Luk KD, Evans JH, Brown B 2000 Effectiveness and biomechanics of spinal orthoses in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Prosthetics and Orthotics International 24: 148–162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yrjonen T, Ylikoski M, Schlenzka D, Poussa M 2007 Results of brace treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in boys compared with girls: A retrospective study of 102 patients treated with Boston brace. European Spine Journal 16: 393–397
   Google Scholar
• Zabjek KF, Leroux MA, Coillard C, Martinez X, Griffet J, Simard G, Rivard CH 2001 Acute postural adaptations induced by a shoe lift in IS patients. European Spine Journal 10: 107–113
   Google Scholar
• Zubovic A, Davies N, Berryman F, Pynsent P, Quraishi N, Lavy C, Bowden G, Wilson-Macdonald J, Fairbank J 2008 New method of scoliosis deformity assessment: ISIS 2 system. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 140: 157–160
   Google Scholar