The validity of using an electrocutaneous device for pain assessment in patients with cervical radiculopathy

References

• Alstergren P, Forstrom J 2003 Acute oral pain intensity and pain threshold assessed by intensity matching to pain induced by electrical stimuli. Journal of Orofacial Pain 17: 151–159
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borg G 1990 Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environmental and Health 16: 55–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien A, Eliav E, Sterling M 2008 Whiplash (grade II) and cervical radiculopathy share a similar sensory presentation: An investigation using quantitative sensory testing. Clinical Journal of Pain 24: 595–603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu TT, Lam TH, Hedley AJ 2005 Correlation among physical impairments, pain, disability, and patient satisfaction in patients with chronic neck pain. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 86: 534–540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Health R 2007 Predictors of short-term outcome in people with a clinical diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. Physical Therapy 87: 1619–1632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins WR Jr, Nulsen FE, Randt CT 1960 Relation of peripheral nerve fiber size and sensation in man. Archives of Neurology 3: 381–385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillin W, Booth R, Cuckler J, Balderston R, Simeone F, Rothman R 1986 Cervical radiculopathy. A review. Spine 11: 988–991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms-Ringdahl K, Carlsson AM, Ekholm J, Raustorp A, Svensson T, Toresson HG 1986 Pain assessment with different intensity scales in response to loading of joint structures. Pain 27: 401–411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg-Johnson S, Van Der Velde G, Carroll LJ, Holm LW, Cassidy JD, Guzman J, Côté P, Haldeman S, Ammendolia C, Carragee E, Hurwitz E, Nordin M, Peloso P 2008 The burden and determinants of neck pain in the general population: Results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and its Associated Disorders. Spine 33: 39–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston V, Jimmieson NL, Jull G, Souvlis T 2008 Quantitative sensory measures distinguish office workers with varying levels of neck pain and disability. Pain 137: 257–265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kall LB, Kowalski J, Stener-Victorin E 2008 Assessing pain perception using the Painmatcher in patients with whiplash-associated disorders. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 40: 171–177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linton S 2000 A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. Spine 25: 1148–1156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund I, Lundeberg T, Kowalski J, Sandberg L, Budh CN, Svensson E 2005 Evaluation of variations in sensory and pain threshold assessments by electrocutaneous stimulation. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 2: 81–92
   Google Scholar
• Lundeberg T, Lund I, Dahlin L, Borg E, Gustafsson C, Sandin L, Rosen A, Kowalski J, Eriksson SV 2001 Reliability and responsiveness of three different pain assessments. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 6: 279–283
   Google Scholar
• McQuay H 2005 Consensus on outcome measures for chronic pain trials. Pain 113: 1–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merskey H, Bogduk N 1994 Classification of chronic pain, Seattle, IASP Press
   Google Scholar
• Persson AL, Westermark S, Merrick D, Sjölund BH 2009 Validity of electrical stimulus magnitude matching in chronic pain. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 41: 898–903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price DD, Bush FM, Long S, Harkins SW 1994 A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain 56: 217–226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price DD, Staud R, Robinson ME 2012 How should we use the visual analogue scale (VAS) in rehabilitation outcomes? II: Visual analogue scales as ratio scales: An alternative to the view of Kerstin et al. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 44: 800–801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prushansky T, Handelzalts S, Pevzner E 2007 Reproducibility of pressure pain threshold and visual analog scale findings in chronic whiplash patients. Clinical Journal of Pain 23: 339–345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan K, Litchy WJ, O'Fallon WM, Kurland LT 1994 Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain 117: 325–335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley JL 3rd, Robinson ME, Wise, EA, Myers CD, Fillingim RB 1998 Sex differences in the perception of noxious experimental stimuli: A meta-analysis. Pain 74: 181–187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sang CN, Max MB, Gracely RH 2003 Stability and reliability of detection thresholds for human A-beta and A-delta sensory afferents determined by cutaneous electrical stimulation. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 25: 64–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott D, Jull G, Sterling M 2005 Widespread sensory hypersensitivity is a feature of chronic whiplash-associated disorder but not chronic idiopathic neck pain. Clinical Journal of Pain 21: 175–181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers S 2001 Evidence-based practice part 2: Reliability and validity of selected acute pain instruments. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing 16: 35–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tampin B, Slater H, Hall T, Lee G, Briffa NK 2012 Quantitative sensory testing somatosensory profiles in patients with cervical radiculopathy are distinct from those in patients with non-specific neck-arm pain. Pain 153: 2403–2414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young IA, Cleland JA, Michener LA, Brown C 2010 Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the neck disability index, patient-specific functional scale, and numeric pain rating scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 89: 831–839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar