The ambiguity of standing in standing devices: a qualitative interview study concerning children and parents experiences of the use of standing devices

References

• Blomqvist U, Nicolau I 2011 Förskrivningsprocessen för hjälpmedel till personer med funktionshinder (prescribing assistive devices for for people with disabilities). Stockholm, Hjälpmedelsinstitutet. http://www.hi.se/Global/pdf/2011/11357-forskrivningsprocessen.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Caulton J, Ward K, Alsop C, Dunn G, Adams J, Mughal M 2004 A randomised controlled trial of standing programme on bone mineral density in non-ambulant children with cerebral palsy. Archives of Disease in Childhood 89: 131–135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey I, Keen D 2008 A review of processes and outcomes in family-centered services for children with a disability. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education 28: 42–52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekenberg L 2000 The meaning of physiotherapy experiences of parents of young adults with impairment. Luleå, Department of Human Work Science. Division of Gender and Technology. 2000: 35 Luleå Institute of Technology
   Google Scholar
• Gibson BE, Teachman G 2012 Critical approaches in physical therapy research: Investigating the symbolic value of walking. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 28: 474–484
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibson BE, Teachman G, Wright V, Fehlings D, Young N, McKeever P 2012 Children's and parents' beliefs regarding the value of walking: Rehabilitation implications for children with cerebral palsy. Child: Care, Health and Development 38: 61–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glickman LB, Geigle PR, Paleg GS 2010 A systematic review of supported standing programs. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine 3: 197–213
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B 2004 Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today 24: 105–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsdottir B, Mercer VS 2002 Effects of a dynamic versus a static prone stander on bone mineral density and behavior in four children with severe cerebral palsy. Pediatric Physical Therapy 14: 38–46
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hadders-Algra M, Brogren Carlberg E (eds) 2008 Introduction: Why bother about postural control? In: Postural control: A key issue in developmental disorders. London, Mac Keith
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen RW, Råheim M 2010 Feeling more in balance and grounded in one's own body and life. Focus group interviews on experiences with Basic Body Awareness Therapy in psychiatric healthcare. Advances in Physiotherapy 12: 166–174
   Google Scholar
• Larsson I, Miller M, Liljedahl K, Gard G 2012 Physiotherapists’ experiences of physiotherapy interventions in scientific physiotherapy publications focusing on interventions for children with cerebral palsy: A qualitative phenomenographic approach. BMC Pediatrics 12: 90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsson C, Himmelmann K 2011 Effect of weight-bearing in abduction and extension on hip stability in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatric Physical Therapy 23: 150–157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeever P, Rossen BE, Robinson-Vincent K, Wright V 2013 The significance of uprightness: Parents' reflections on children's responses to a hands-free walker for children. Disability and Society 28: 380–392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, Olson K, Spiers J 2002 Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 1: 13–22
   Google Scholar
• Mulderij KJ 1996 Research into the lifeworld of physically disabled children. Child: Care, Health and Development 22: 311–322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulderij KJ 2000 Dualistic notions about children with motor disabilities: Hands to lean on or to reach out? Qualitative Health Research 10: 39–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordström B, Näslund A, Ekenberg L 2013 On an equal footing: Adults’ accounts of the experience of using assistive devices for standing. Disability Rehabilitation Assistive Technology 8: 49–57
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nordström B, Näslund A, Nyberg L, Eriksson M, Ekenberg L 2013 The impact of supported standing on wellbeing and quality of life. Physiotherapy Canada 65: 344–352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT 2008 Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice, 8th edn. Philadelphia, Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippicott Willilams & Wilklins
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P, Gorter JW 2012 The ‘F‐words’ in childhood disability: I swear this is how we should think! Child: Care, Health and Development 38: 457–463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus EW 1966 Phenomenological psychology: The selected papers of Erwin W. Straus. London: Tavistock Publications
   Google Scholar
• Stuberg WA 1992 Considerations related to weight-bearing programs in children with developmental disabilities. Physical Therapy 72: 35–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor K 2009 Factors affecting prescription and implementation of standing-frame programs by school-based physical therapists for children with impaired mobility. Pediatric Physical Therapy 21: 282–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikström-Grotell C, Eriksson K 2012 Movement as a basic concept in physiotherapy – A human science approach. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 28: 428–438
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization 2001 International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva, World Health Organization
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization 2007 International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Children and Youth Version: ICF-CY. Geneva, World Health Organization
   Google Scholar