Quality and accuracy of Internet information concerning a healthy diet

References

• , American Diabetes AssociationBantle JP, Wylie-Rosett J, Albright AL, Apovian CM, Clark NG, Franz MJ, et al. 2008. Nutrition recommendations and interventions for diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 31:S61–S78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Dietetic Association. 2008. Nutrition and You: trends 2008 ADA’s consumer opinion survey. Available at: http://www.eatright.org/Media/content.aspx?id=7639. Accessed on 29 June 2010
   Google Scholar
• , American Heart Association Nutrition CommitteeLichtenstein AH, Appel LJ, Brands M, Carnethon M, Daniels S, Franch HA, et al. 2006. Diet and lifestyle recommendations revision 2006: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Nutrition Committee. Circulation 114:82–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreassen HK, Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Chronaki CE, Dumitru RC, Pudule I, Santana S, Voss H, et al. 2007. European citizens’ use of E-health services: a study of seven countries. BMC Public Health 7:53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astrup A, Ryan L, Grunwald GK, Storgaard M, Saris W, Melanson E, Hill JO. (2000). The role of dietary fat in body fatness: evidence from a preliminary meta-analysis of ad libitum low-fat dietary intervention studies. Br J Nutr 83:S25–S32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray GA, Popkin BM. 1998. Dietary fat intake does affect obesity! Am J Clin Nutr 68:1157–1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton WH, Helsper EJ, Gerber MM. (2009). Oxford Internet Survey. The Internet in Britain 2009. Available at: http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/oxis/OxIS2009_Report.pdf. Accessed on 30 July 2011
   Google Scholar
• Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER. 2002. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA 287:2691–2700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox S. 2006. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Online Health Search 2006. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2006/Online-Health-Search-2006.aspx. Accessed on 05 August 2011
   Google Scholar
• Fox S. 2011a. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. Health topics. Available at: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/HealthTopics.aspx. Accessed on 30 July 2011
   Google Scholar
• Fox S. 2011b. Pew Internet & American Life Project. The social life of health information, 2011. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Social-Life-of-Health-Info.aspx. Accessed on 02 May 2013
   Google Scholar
• Fox S, Jones S. 2009. Pew Internet & American Life Project. The social life of health information. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2009/PIP_Health_2009.pdf. Accessed on 02 May 2013
   Google Scholar
• Fox S, Rainie L. 2002. The Pew Internet & American Life Project. Vital Decisions: How Inter-net Users Decide what Information to Trust when they or their Loved Ones are Sick. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2002/Vital-Decisions-A-Pew-Internet-Health-Report.aspx. Accessed on 30 July 2011
   Google Scholar
• Fox NJ, Ward KJ, O'Rourke AJ. 2005. The ‘expert patient’: empowerment or medical dominance? The case of weight loss, pharmaceutical drugs and the Internet. Soc Sci Med 60:1299–1309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabarron E, Fernandez-Luque L, Armayones M, Lau AY. 2013. Identifying measures used for assessing quality of YouTube videos with patient health information: a review of current literature. Interact J Med Res 2:e6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffiths KM, Christensen H. 2005. Website quality indicators for consumers. J Med Internet Res 7:e55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunasekera V, Ernst E, Ezra DG. 2008. Systematic internet-based review of complementary and alternative medicine for glaucoma. Ophthalmology 115:435–439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse BW, Moser RP, Rutten LJ. 2010. Surveys of physicians and electronic health information. N Engl J Med 362:859–860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirasawa R, Saito K, Yachi Y, Ibe Y, Kodama S, Asumi M, Horikawa C, et al. 2012. Quality of Internet information related to the Mediterranean diet. Public Health Nutr 15:885–893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jothi PS, Neelamalar M, Prasad RS. 2011. Analysis of social networking sites: a study on effective communication strategy in developing brand communication. J Media Communication Studies 3:234–242
   Google Scholar
• Kim DY, Lee HR, Nam EM. 2009. Assessing cancer treatment related information online: unintended retrieval of complementary and alternative medicine web sites. Eur J Cancer Care 18:64–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Internal Affairs & Communications. 2005. White Paper information and communications in Japan. Information & communications statics database 2005. Available at: http://www.soumu.go.jp/johotsusintokei/whitepaper/h17.html. Accessed on 30 July 2011
   Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. 2006. Your guide to lowering your blood pressure with DASH. Available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/public/heart/hbp/dash/new_dash.pdf. Accessed on 30 July 2011
   Google Scholar
• Powell JA, Darvell M, Gray JA. 2003. The doctor, the patient and the world-wide web: how the internet is changing healthcare. J R Soc Med 96:74–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandvik H. 1999. Health information and interaction on the internet: a survey of female urinary incontinence. BMJ 319:29–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanfeld D, Scanfeld V, Larson EL. 2010. Dissemination of health information through social networks: twitter and antibiotics. Am J Infect Control 38:182–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt K, Ernst E. 2004. Assessing websites on complementary and alternative medicine for cancer. Ann Oncol 15:733–742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith KP, Christakis NA. 2008. Social networks and health. Annual review of sociology 34:405–429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan D. 2006. Search Engine Watch. Nielsen net ratings search engine ratings. Available at: http://searchenginewatch.com. Accessed on 30 July 2011
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan D. 2007. Search engine land. Nielsen NetRatings: August 2007 search share puts Google on top, Microsoft holding gains. Available at: http://searchengineland.com/nielsen-netratings-august-2007-search-share-puts-google-on-top-microsoft-holding-gains-12243. Accessed on 30 July 2011
   Google Scholar
• Thackeray R, Crookston BT, West JH. 2013. Correlates of health-related social media use among adults. J Med Internet Res 15:e21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The World Bank. 2011. World development indicators (WDI). Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.P2. Accessed on 30 July 2011
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2000. Healthy People. Healthy People 2010. Available at: http://www.healthypeople.gov. Accessed on 16 February 2011
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2005. Dietary guidelines for Americans 2005. Available at: www.healthierus.gov/dietaryguidelines. Accessed on 30 July 2011
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2005. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. How to evaluate health information on the Internet. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/ResourcesForYou/Consumers/BuyingUsingMedicineSafely/BuyingMedicinesOvertheInternet/ucm202863.htm. Accessed on 05 August 2011
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2005. Center for nutrition policy and promotion. My Pyramid. Available at: http://www.mypyramid.gov/. Accessed on 16 February 2011
   Google Scholar
• Yan YY. 2010. Online health information seeking behavior in Hong Kong: an exploratory study. J Med Syst 34:147–153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun EK, Park HA. 2010. Consumers’ disease information-seeking behaviour on the Internet in Korea. J Clin Nurs 19:2860–2868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu-Poth S, Zhao G, Etherton T, Naglak M, Jonnalagadda S, Kris-Etherton P. 1999. Effects of the National Cholesterol Education Program's Step I and Step II dietary intervention programs on cardiovascular disease risk factors: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 69:632–646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar