References
- Clifford, P. (1998). M is for outcome: The CORE outcomes initiative. Journal of Mental Health, 7(1), 19–24.
- Commander, M., Sashidharan, S., Rana, T., & Ratnayake, T. (2005). North Birmingham Assertive Outreach Evaluation – Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 40(12), 988–993.
- Department of Health. (2001). The Mental Health Policy Implementation Guide. London: Department of Health.
- Department of Health. (2006). Mental Health Services: Project on Implementation of Outcomes Measurement. London: Department of Health.
- Department of Health. (2008). Refocusing the Care Programme ApproachLondonDepartment of Health
- Gilbody, S. M., House, A. O., & Sheldon, T. A. (2002). Psychiatrists in the UK do not use outcome measures. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 101–103.
- HM Government. (2007). PSA Delivery Agreement 16: Increase the proportion of socially excluded adults in settled accommodation and employment, education or training. London: HMSO.
- Jacobs, R. & Moran, V. (2010). Uptake of mandatory outcome measures in mental health services. The Psychiatrist, 34, 338–343.
- Kisely, S., Campbell, L. A., Robertson, H., Crossman, D., Martin, K., & Campbell, J. (2008). Routine measurement of mental health service outcomes: Health of the Nation Outcome Scales in Nova Scotia. Psychiatric Bulletin, 32, 248–250.
- Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311, 540–543.
- Lambert, M. J., Hansen, N. B., & Finch, A. E. (2001). Patient focused research: Using patient outcome data to enhance treatment effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 159–172.
- Marks, I. (1998). Overcoming obstacles to routine outcome measurement. The nuts and bolts of implementing clinical audit. British Journal of Psychiatry, 173, 281–286.
- Marshall, M., Lockwood, A., Green, G., Zajac-Roles, G., Roberts, C., & Harrison, G. (2004). Systematic assessments of need and care planning in severe mental illness. Cluster randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 185, 163–168.
- National Institute of Mental Health England. (2005). Outcome Measures Implementation Best Practice Guidance. London: Department of Health.
- Priebe, S., McCabe, R., Bullenkamp, J., Hansson, L., Lauber, C., Martinez-Leal, R., et al. (2007). Structured patient-clinician communication and one year outcome in community mental health care. British Journal of Psychiatry, 191, 420–426.
- Rees, A., Richards, A., & Shapiro, D. A. (2004). Utility of the HoNOS in measuring change in a Community Mental Health Care population. Journal of Mental Health, 13(3), 295–304.
- Slade, M., Thornicroft, G., & Glover, G. (1999). The feasibility of routine outcome measures in mental health. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 34, 243–249.
- Slade, M. (2002). Routine outcome assessment in mental health services. Psychological Medicine, 32, 1339–1343.
- Slade, M., McCrone, P., Kuipers, E., Leese, M., Cahill, S., Parabiaghi, A., et al. (2006). Use of standardised outcome measures in adult mental health services. British Journal of Psychiatry, 189, 330–336.
- Stein, G. S. (1999). Usefulness of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 375–377.
- Trauer, T., Callaly, T., & Herrman, H. (2009). Attitudes of mental health staff to routine outcome measurement. Journal of Mental Health, 18, 288–296.
- Trauer, T. (2010a). Chapter 1. Introduction. Outcome Measurement in Mental Health: Theory and Practice. In T. Trauer (Ed.), (pp.1–10) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Trauer, T. (2010b). Outcome measurement in chronic mental illness. International Review of Psychiatry, 22(2), 99–113.
- Valenstein, M., Adler, D. A., Berlant, J., Dixon, L. B., Dulit, R.A., Goldman, B., et al. (2009). Implementing standardized assessments in clinical care: Now's the time. Psychiatric Services, 60(10), 1372–1275.
- Watts, D., Bindman, J., Slade, M., Holloway, F., Rosen, A., & Thornicroft, G. (2004). Clinical assessment of risk decision support (CARDS): The development and evaluation of a feasible violence risk assessment for routine psychiatric practice. Journal of Mental Health, 13(6), 569–581.