References
- Bloomfield AN. (2006). Group size and the framing effect. Mem Cognit, 34, 929–37
- Gale TM, Hawley CJ, Sivakumaran T. (2003). Do mental health professionals really understand probability? Implications for risk assessment and evidence-based practice. J Ment Health, 12, 411–24
- Hawley CJ, Littlechild B, Sivakumaran T, et al. (2006). Structure and content of risk assessment proformas in mental healthcare. J Ment Health, 15, 437–48
- Jianakoplos NA, Bernasek A. (1998). Are women more risk averse? Econ Inq, 36, 620–30
- Kirsch IS, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L, Kolstad A. (2002). Adult literacy in America: A first look at the findings of the National Adult Literacy Survey (NCES Report No. 1993-275; 3rd ed.).Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics
- Marteau TM. (1989). Framing of information: Its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients. Br J Soc Psychol, 28, 89–94
- McNeil BJ, Pauker SG, Sox HC Jr, Tversky A. (1982). On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. N Engl J Med, 306, 1259–62
- Tversky A, Kahneman D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–8
- Wang X, Simons F, Brédart S. (2001). Social cues and verbal framing in risky choice. J Behav Decis Making, 14, 1–15
- Yamagishi K. (1997). When a 12.86% mortality is more dangerous than 24.14%: Implications for risk communication. Appl Cognit Psychol, 11, 495–506