Validation of Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) in a population of people using Secondary Care Mental Health Services

References

• Arbuckle JL. (2010). IMS SPSS Amos 19 user’s guide. Chicago, (IL): IBM
   Google Scholar
• Bartram DJ, Yadegarfar G, Sinclair JMA, Baldwin DS. (2011). Validation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) as an overall indicator of population mental health and well-being in the UK veterinary profession. Vet J, 187, 397–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown TA. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press
   Google Scholar
• Browne MW, Cudek R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, eds. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, (CA): Sage, 445–55
   Google Scholar
• Care Pathways and Packages Project. (2013). Patient Rated Outcome Measure. Available from: http://www.cppconsortium.nhs.uk/prom.php [last accessed 25 Oct 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Clarke A, Friede T, Putz R, et al. (2011). Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): Validated for teenage school students in England and Scotland. A mixed methods assessment. BMC Public Health, 11, 487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson L, Lawless MS, Leary F. (2006). Concepts of recovery: Competing or complementary. Curr Opin Psychiatry, 19, 619–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gremigni P, Stewart-Brown SL. (2011). Measuring mental well-being: Italian validation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS). Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 2, 543–63
   Google Scholar
• Hu L-T, Bentler PM. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Eq Model Multidisciplin J, 6, 1–55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kammann R, Flett R. (1983). Affectometer 2: A scale to measure current level of general happiness. Aust J Psychol, 35, 259–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. (2003) Rasch power analysis: Size vs. significance: Infit and outfit standardized chi-square fit statistic. Rasch Meas Trans, 17, 918
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. (2006). Winsteps Rasch measurement computer program. Chicago: Winsteps.com
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd K, Devine P. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) in Northern Ireland. J Ment Health, 21, 257–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lόpez MA, Gabilondo A, Codony M, et al. (2013). Adaptation into Spanish of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) and preliminary validation into a student sample. Qual Life Res, 22, 1099–04
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheswaran H, Weich S, Powell J, Stewart-Brown S. (2012). Evaluation the responsiveness of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): Group and individual level analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 10, 156–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavranezouli L, Brazier JE, Young TA, Barkham M. (2010). Using Rasch analysis to form plausible health states amenable to valuation: The development of CORE-6D from a measure of common mental health problems (CORE-OM). Qual Life Res, 20, 321–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. (1995). Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: Are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res, 4, 293–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modelling. J Stat Softw, 48, 1–36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satorra A, Bentler PM. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In: von Eye A, Clogg CC, eds. Latent variable analysis: Applications for developmental research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 399–419
   Google Scholar
• Scheuneman JD, Subhiyah RG. (1998). Evidence for the validity of a Rasch model technique for identifying differential item functioning. J Outcome Meas, 2, 33–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stewart-Brown S, Tennant A, Tennant R, et al. (2009). Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): A Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish Health Education Population Survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 7, 15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart-Brown S, Janmohamed K. (2008). Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) User Guide, Version 1. Available from: http://www.healthscotland.com/documents/2702.aspx [last accessed 15 Nov 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Taggart FM, Friede T, Weich S, et al. (2013). Cross cultural evaluation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) – a mixed methods study. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 11, 27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, et al. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 5, 63. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tristan A. (2006). An adjustment for sample size in DIF analysis. Rasch Meas Trans, 20, 2
   Google Scholar
• Weich S, Brugha T, King M, et al. (2011). Mental well-being and mental illness: Findings from the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey for England. Br J Psychiatry, 199, 23–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright BD, Linacre JM, Gustaffson J-E, Martin-Loff P. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Meas Trans, 8, 370
   Google Scholar
• Wright BD, Stone MH. (2004). Making measures. Chicago: The Phaneron Press
   Google Scholar