Functioning of stroke survivors – A validation of the ICF core set for stroke in Sweden

References

• World Health Organization. WHO STEPS stroke manual: the WHO STEPwise approach to stroke surveillance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins JS, Johnston SC. Thirty-year for deaths from ischemic stroke in the United States. Stroke 2003;34:2109–2112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(3): CD000197. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000197.
   Google Scholar
• Kjellström T, Norrving B, Shatchkute A. Helsinborg Declaration 2006 on European stroke strategies. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007;23:229–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacomini M. Interdisciplinarity in health services research: dreams and nightmares, maladies and remedies. J Health Serv Res Policy 2004;9:177–183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Gladman JRF. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health and its value to rehabilitation and geriatric medicine. J Chin Med Assoc 2008;71:275–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rentsch H, Bucher P, Nyffeler I, Wolf C, Hefti H, Fluri E, Wenger U, Wälti C, Boyer I. The implementation of the ‘International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health’ (ICF) in daily practice of neurorehabilitation: an interdisciplinary project at the Kantonsspital of Lucerne, Switzerland. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:411–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soberg HL, Finset A, Roise O, Bautz-Holter E. Indentification and comparison of rehabilitation goals after multiple injuries: an ICF analysis of the patients', physiotherapists' and other allied professionals reported goals. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:340–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner WA, Ryser L, Huber E, Uebelhart D, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Phys Ther 2002;82:1098–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:932–938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tempest S, McIntyre A. Using the ICF to clarify team roles and demonstrate clinical reasoning in stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:663–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iezzoni L, Greenberg M. Capturing and classifying functional status information in administrative databases. Health Care Financ Rev 2003;24:61–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo NE, Poissant L, Ahmed S, Finch L, Higgins J, Salbach NM, Soicher J, Jaglal S. Incorporating the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) into an electronic health record to create indicators of function: proof of concept using the SF-12. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:514–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uestün T, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Bickenbach J. WHO's ICF and functional status information in health records. Health Care Financ Rev 2003;24:77–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Ewert T, Uestün B, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. Development of ICF core sets for patients with chronic conditions. J Rehabil Med 2004;S44:9–S44:11.
   Google Scholar
• Ewert T, Grill E, Bartholomeyczik S, Finger M, Mokrusch T, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. ICF core set for patients with neurological conditions in the acute hospital. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:367–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, Dickson H, Frommelt P, Omar Z, Kostanjsek N, Ring H, Stucki G. ICF core sets for stroke. J Rehabil Med 2004. (Suppl. 44): 135–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starrost K, Geyh S, Trautwein A, Grunow J, Ceballos-Baumann A, Prosiegel M, Stucki G, Cieza A. Interrater reliability of the extended ICF core set for stroke applied by physical therapists. Phys Ther 2008;88:841–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICF Research Branch of WHO CC F IC (DIMDI), Institute for Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilian University. ICF Core Sets multicenter international validation study. Ludwig-Maximilian University, Germany; 2006. Electronic Citation. http://www.icf-research-branch.org/research/validationstudy.htm. Last accessed August 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Barak S, Duncan P. Issues in selection outcome measures to assess functional recovery after stroke. NeuroRx 2006;3:505–524.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duncan P, Goldstein L, Horner R, Landsman P, Samsa G, Matchar D. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke 1994;25:1181–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen H, Nakayama H, Raaschou H, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen T. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:406–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Twisk J. Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke. Stroke 2006;37:2348–2353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, De Wit L, Thijs V, Dobbelaere J, Devos H, Severijns D, Vanbeveren S, De Weerdt W. Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke. J Neurol Rehabil 2008;22:173–179.
   Google Scholar
• Geyh S, Kurt T, Brockow T, Cieza A, Ewert T, Omar Z, Resch KL. Identifying the concepts contained in the outcome measures of clinical trials on stroke using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a reference. J Rehabil Med 2004. (Suppl 44):56–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyttenboogaart M, Luijckx G, Vroomen P, Stewart R, De Keyser J. Measuring disability in stroke: relationship between the modified Rankin scale and the Barthel index. J Neurol 2007;254:1113–1117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algurén B, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Sunnerhagen K. Facilitators and barriers of stroke survivors in the early post-stroke phase. Disabil Rehabil 2009;18:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization Stroke. Recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Report of the WHO Task Force on stroke and other cerebrovascular disorders. Stroke 1989;20:1407–1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier-Jamer M, Grill E, Ewert T, Bartholomeyczik S, Finger M, Mokrusch T, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. ICF core set for patients with neurological conditions in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:389–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai SM, Duncan PW. Stroke recovery profile and the modified Rankin Assessment. Neuroepidemiology 2001;20:26–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson J, Hareendran A, Hendry A, Potter J, Bone I, Muir K. Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale across multiple raters: benefits of a structured interview. Stroke 2005;36:777–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulter G, Steen C, De Keyser J. Use of the Barthel Index and modified Rankin Scale in acute stroke trials. Stroke 1999;30:1538–1541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakravarti I, Laha R, Roy J. Handbook of methods of applied statistics. Vol. 1. New York: Wiley; 1967. pp 392–394.
   Google Scholar
• Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke 1988;19:1497–1500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendricks H, van Limbek J, Geurts A, Zwarts M. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1629–1637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay-Lyons M, Makrides L. Exercise capacity early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1697–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potempa K, Lopez M, Braun L, Szidon P, Fogg L, Tinckell T. Physiological outcomes of aerobic exercise training in hemiparetic stroke patients. Stroke 1995;26:101–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris S, Dodd K, Morris M. Outcomes of progressive resistance strength training following stroke: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:27–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glader E, Stegmayr B, Asplund K. Poststroke fatigue: a 2-year follow-up study of stroke patients in Sweden. Stroke 2002;33:1327–1333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingles J, Eskes G, Phillips S. Fatigue after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:173–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glader E, Stegmayr B, Norrving B, Terént A, Hulter-Åsberg K, Wester PO, Asplund K. Riks-Stroke Collaboration. Sex differences in management and outcome after stroke: a Swedish national perspective. Stroke 2003;34:1970–1975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nationella riktlinjer för strokesjukvård. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen; 2006. Electronic Citation. http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/Publicerat/2009/10295/2009-126-35.htm. Last accessed August 2009.
   Google Scholar
• American Heart Association. Heart and Stroke Statistical – 2008 update. Dallas, Texas: American Heart Association; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hallström B, Jönsson A, Nerbrand C, Norrving B, Lindgren A. Stroke incidence and survival in the beginning of the 21st century in Southern Sweden. Stroke 2008;39:10–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen H, Nakayama H, Raaschou H, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen T. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:399–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai S-M, Duncan PW, Dew P, Keighley J. Sex differences in stroke recovery. Prev Chronic Dis. Internet 2005. Electronic Citation. http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2005/jul/04_0137.htm. Last accessed July, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett J. Bladder and bowel problems after stroke. Rev Clin Gerontol 2002;12:253–267.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes M, Dobkin B, Bogousslavsky J. Recovery after stroke. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Moller Pedersen P, Kammersgaard L, Raaschou HO, Skyhoj Olsen T. Epidemiology of stroke-related disability. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Clin Geriatr Med 1999;15:785–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepers V, Ketelaar M, van de Port I, Visser-Meily J, Lindeman E. Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:221–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flansbjer U, Downham D, Lexell J. Knee muscle strength, gait performance, and perceived participation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:974–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijntjes M. Mechanisms of recovery in stroke patients with hemiparesis of aphasia: new insights, old questions and the meaning of therapies. Curr Opin Neurol 2006;19:76–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studenski S, Wallace D, Duncan P, Rymer M, Lai S. Predicting stroke recovery: three- and six- months rates of patient-centered functional outcomes based on the Orpington Prognostic Scale. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:308–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004;22:281–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin M, Kleim J, Wolf S. What do motor ‘recovery’ and ‘compensation’ mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:313–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar