Working with families of persons with aphasia: a survey of Swedish speech and language pathologists

References

• WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Threats T. Access for persons with neurogenic communication disorders: influences of personal and environmental factors of the ICF. Aphasiology 2007;21:67–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapey R. Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. 5th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hartelius L, Nettelbladt U, Hammarberg B. Logopedi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB; 2007. [In Swedish]
   Google Scholar
• Avent J, Glista S, Wallace S, Jackson J, Nishioka J, Yip W. Family information needs about aphasia. Aphasiology 2005;19:365–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund E-L, Pettersson K. Vägen tillbaka till vardagslivet - en deskriptiv studie av att leva med afasi. [FoU-rapport 2005:2]. Landstinget Kronoberg; 2005. [In Swedish]
   Google Scholar
• Glozman JM. Communication disorders and personality. In: Tupper DE, editor. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lubinski R. Environmental approach to adult aphasia. In: Chapey R, editor. Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. 5th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2008. p. 319–348.
   Google Scholar
• Glass TA, Matchar DB, Belyea M, Feussner JR. Impact on social support on outcome in first stroke. Stroke 1993;24:64–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsouna-Hadjis E, Vemmos KN, Zakopoulos N, Stamatelopoulos S. First-stroke recovery process: the role of family social support. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:881–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Währborg P, Borenstein P. The aphasic person and his/her family: what about the future? Aphasiology 1990;4:371–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan A. Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: methods and resources for training conversation partners. Aphasiology 1998;12:816–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinlay WW, Hickox A. How can families help in the rehabilitation of the head injured? J Head Trauma Rehabil 1988;3:64–72.
   Google Scholar
• Lesser R, Bryan K, Anderson J, Hilton R. Involving relatives in aphasia therapy: an application of language enrichment therapy. Int J Rehabil Res 1986;9:259–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hux K, Manasse N, Weiss A, Beukelman DR. Augmentative and alternative communication for persons with aphasia. In: Chapey R, editor. Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 675–687.
   Google Scholar
• Parr S. Psychosocial aspects of aphasia: whose perspectives? Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 2001;53:266–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyström M. Aphasia – an existential loneliness: a study on the loss of the world of symbols. Int J Qualit Stud Health Well-Being 2006;1:38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Le Dorze G, Brassard C. A description of the consequences of aphasia on aphasic persons and their relatives and friends, based on the WHO model of chronic diseases. Aphasiology 1995;9:239–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servaes P, Draper B, Conroy P, Bowring G. Informal carers of aphasic stroke patients: stresses and intervention. Aphasiology 1999;13:889–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom Johansson M. Hur är det att leva med en person som får afasi “mitt i livet”? [magisteruppsats]. Stockholm: Institutionen för klinisk vetenskap, enheten för logopedi och foniatri. Karolinska Institutet; 2006 [In Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Währborg P. Assessment and management of emotional and psychosocial reactions to brain damage and aphasia. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group Inc.; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann M, Wallesch CW. Psychosocial changes and psychosocial adjustment with chronic and severe non-fluent aphasia. Aphasiology 1989;3:513–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams SE. The impact of aphasia on marital satisfaction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:361–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artes R, Hoops R. Problems of aphasic and non-aphasic stroke patients as identified and evaluated by patients' wives. In: Lebrun, Hoops, editors. Recovery in aphasics. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger; 1976. p. 31–45.
   Google Scholar
• Bakas T, Kroenke K, Plue LD, Perkins SM, Williams LS. Outcomes among family caregivers of aphasic versus nonaphasic stroke survivors. Rehabil Nurs 2006;31:33–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen JM, Anderson JD. Spouse adjustment to stroke: aphasic versus nonaphasic partners. J Commun Disord 1989;22:225–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella GJ, Duffy FD. Psychosocial readjustment in the spouses of aphasic patients. Scand J Rehabil Med 1979;11:129–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Denman A. Determining the needs of spouses caring for aphasic partners. Disabil Rehabil 1998;20:411–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michallet B, Le Dorze G, Tétreault S. The needs of spouses caring for severely aphasic persons. Aphasiology 2001;15:731–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinckley JJ, Packard MEW. Family education seminars and social functioning of adults with chronic aphasia. J Commun Disord 2001;34:241–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Gaag A, Smith L, Davis S, Moss B, Cornelius V, Laing S, Mowles C. Therapy and support services for people with long-term stroke and aphasia and their relatives: a six-month follow-up study. Clin Rehab 2005;19:372–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lock S, Wilkinson R, Bryan K. SPPARC supporting partners of people with aphasia in relationships & conversation. Bicester: Speechmark; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hoen B, Thelander M, Worsley J. Improvement in psychological well-being of people with aphasia and their families: evaluation of a community-based programme. Aphasiology 1997;11:681–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham R, Ward CD. Evaluation of a training programme to facilitate conversation between people with aphasia and their partners. Aphasiology 2003;17:687–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper T, Holland A, Rewega M. Conversational coaching: treatment outcomes and future directions. Aphasiology 2002;16:745–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon JG, Cariski D, Keisler L, Rosenbek J, Levine R, Kumpula J, Ryff C, Coyne S, Blanc M. Communication partners: enhancing participation in life and communication for adults with aphasia in natural settings. Aphasiology 1997;11:693–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Währborg P, Borenstein P. Family therapy in families with an aphasic member. Aphasiology 1989;3:93–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice B, Paull A, Müller DJ. An evaluation of a social support group for spouses of aphasic partners. Aphasiology 1987;1:247–256.
   Google Scholar
• Johannsen-Horbach H, Crone M, Wallesch C-W. Group therapy for spouses of aphasic patients. Seminars in speech and language 1999;20:73–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sorin-Peters R. The evaluation of a learner-centered training programme for spouses of adults with chronic aphasia using qualitative case study methodology. Aphasiology 2004;18:951–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth S, Swabey D. Group training in communication skills for carers of adults with aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord 1999;34:291–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verna A, Davidson B, Rose T. Speech-language pathology services for people with aphasia: a survey of current practice in Australia. Int J Speech-Lang Pathol 2009;11:191–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asplund K, Hulter Asberg K, Norrving B, Stegmayr B, Terent A, Wester PO. Riks-stroke – a Swedish national quality register for stroke care. Cerebrovascular Dis 2003;15 Suppl 1:5–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The national Swedish Board of Health and Welfare. National guidelines for stroke care 2005. Stockholm: 2007. Report no 2007-102-10. Available from: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer2007/2007-102-10
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. Livssituationen två år efter stroke – En uppföljning av strokedrabbade och deras närstående. Stockholm: 2004. Report nr 2004-123-40. Available from: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer2004/2004-123-40 [In Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• SPSS Inc. SPSS advanced models 15.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualit Health Res 2005;15:1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codex [Internet]. Rules and guidelines for research. The Swedish Research Counsil. Available from: http://www.codex.vr.se/en/index.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Pring T. Research methods in communication disorders. London: Whurr publishers; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research principles and methods. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004.
   Google Scholar