The FIM™ as a measure of change in function after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: a Canadian perspective

References

• Majnemer A, Limperopoulos C. Importance of outcome determination in pediatric rehabilitation. Dev Med Child Neurol 2002;44:773–777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, Deyo RA. A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:531–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton BB, Lauglin JA, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Interrater reliability of the 7-level Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Scand J Rehabil Med 1994;26:115–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heineman AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger CV. Relationships between impairment and physical disability as measured by the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:566–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1226–1232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stineman MG, Shea JA, Jette A, Tassoni CJ, Ottenbacher KJ, Fiedler R, Granger CV. The Functional Independence Measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1101–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepers VP, Ketelaar M, Visser-Meily JM, Dekker J, Lindeman E. Responsiveness of functional health status measures frequently used in stroke research. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1035–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coster WJ, Haley SM, Jette AM. Measuring patient-reported outcomes after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation settings. J Rehabil Med 2006;38:237–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJong B, Tian W, Smout RJ, Horn SD, Putman K, Hsieh CH, Gassaway J, Smith P. Long-term outcomes of joint replacement rehabilitation patients discharged from skilled nursing and inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:1306–1316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Putten JJ, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999;6:480–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cott CA, Jaglal S, McKillop I, Brown A, Blackstien-Hirsch P, Canizares M, Daniel I, Levinton C, MacKay C, McGillis Hall L, Pink G, Porcellato C, Soever L, Tyas J. Hospital Report 2005: rehabilitation. Joint Initiative of the Ontario Hospital Association and the Government of Ontario. Toronto: Hospital Report Research Collaborative, University of Toronto; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Institute for Health Information. CIHI Update: National Rehabilitation Reporting System: Follow-up assessments. Canadian Institute for Health Information. 2005. Electronic citation http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/en/downloads/NRS_Update_dec2005_e.pdf. Last accessed March 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Huang ME, Wartella JE, Kreutzer JS. Functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with brain tumors: a preliminary report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1540–1546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosenthal AC, Livingston DH, Lavery RF, Knudson MM, Lee S, Morabito D, Manley GT, Nathens A, Jurkovich G, Hoyt DB, Coimbra R. The effect of age on functional outcome in mild traumatic brain injury: 6-month report of a prospective multicenter trial. J Trauma 2004;56:1042–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang ME, Wartella JE, Kreutzer JS. Functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with brain tumors: a preliminary report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1540–1546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coster WJ, Haley SM, Jette AM. Measuring patient-reported outcomes after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation settings. J Rehabil Med 2006;38:237–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook TL, Anderson JP, Sieber WJ, Browner D, Hoyt DB. Outcome after major trauma: discharge and 6-month follow-up results from the Trauma Recovery Project. Trauma 1998;45:315–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang ME, Wartella JE, Kreutzer JS. Functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with brain tumors: a preliminary report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1540–1546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagaya H, Takahashi H, Sugawara K, Dobashi M, Kiyokawa N, Ebina H. Predicting outcomes after hip fracture repair. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84:46–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beninato M, Gill-Body KM, Salles S, Stark PC, Black-Schaffer RM, Stein J. Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:32–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck GG. Measuring what matters: key rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:1073–1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol M, de Haan R, van den Bos G, de Jong B, de Groot I. The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire (IPAQ). Clin Rehabil 1999;13:411–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol M, de Haan R, de Jong B, van den Bos G, de Groot I. Psychometric properties of the impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:210–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol M, de Jong B, Ward C. On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:970–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L, Bergeron H, Cloutier R, Dion S, St Michel G. Social consequences of long-term impairments and disabilities: conceptual approaches and assessment of handicap. Int J Rehabil Res 1998;21:127–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P, Vincent C. The LIFE-H: assessment of the quality of social participation. Technol Disabil 2002;14:113–118.
   Google Scholar
• Noreau L, Desosiers J, Robichaud L, Fougeyrollas P, Rochette A, Viscogliosi C. Measuring social participation: reliability of the LIFE-H in older adults with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:346–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cott CA. Goal Setting. In: Pickles B, Compton A, Cott C, editors. Physiotherapy with older people. Philadephia: WB Saunders Co; 1995. pp 189–196.
   Google Scholar
• Tyson S, Turner G. Discharge and follow-up for people with stroke: what happens and why. Clin Rehabil 2000;14:392.
   Google Scholar
• Perenboom RJ, Chorus AM. Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:577–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cott CA, Wiles R, Devitt R. Continuity, transition and participation: preparing clients for life in the community post stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1566–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldry Currens JA, Coats TJ. The timing of disability measurements following injury. Injury 2000;31:93–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrella RJ, Overend T, Chesworth B. FIM after hip fracture: is telephone administration valid and sensitive to change? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002;81:639–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal ME, Gillard M, Schall R. Telephone and in-person proxy agreement between stroke patients and caregivers for the functional independence measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996;75:208–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith PM, Illig SB, Fiedler RC, Hamilton BB, Ottenbacher KJ. Intermodal agreement of follow-up telephone functional assessment using the Functional Independence Measure in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:431–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferriero G, Franchignoni F, Benevolo E, Ottonello M, Schocchi M, Xanthi M. The influence of comorbidities and complications on discharge function in stroke rehabilitation inpatients. Eura Medicophys 2006;42:91–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karatepe AG, Gunaydin R, Kaya T, Turkmen G. Comorbidity in patients after stroke: impact on functional outcome. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:831–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlowitz DR, Hoenig H, Cowper DC, Duncan PW, Vogel WB. Impact of comorbidities on stroke rehabilitation outcomes: does the method matter? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:1903–1906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar