Developing a tool for evaluating community-based rehabilitation in Uganda

References

• WHO, ILO, and UNESCO. CBR; a strategy for rehabilitation, equalisation of opportunities, poverty reduction and social inclusion of people with disabilities. Internet. 2004. Electronic Citation. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/employment/skills/download/jointpaper.pdf. Last accessed 10 October 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Finkenflugel H, Wolffers I, Huijsman R. The evidence base for community-based rehabilitation: a literature review. Int J Rehabil Res 2005;28:187–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkenflügel H, Dube S, Munthali A, Loeb M. CBR research as part of community development. CBR as part of community development: a poverty reduction strategy. London: University College London; 2006. p 2.
   Google Scholar
• Velema JP, Ebenso B, Fuzikawa PL. Evidence for the effectiveness of rehabilitation-in-the-community programmes. Lepr Rev 2008;79:65–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornielje H, Velema JP, Finkenflugel H. Community based rehabilitation programmes: monitoring and evaluation in order to measure results. Lepr Rev 2008;79:36–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkenflugel H, Rule S. Integrating community-based rehabilitation and leprosy rehabilitation services into an inclusive development approach. Lepr Rev 2008;79:83–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkenflugel H. Empowered to differ: stakeholders' influences in community-based rehabilitation. Rotterdam, Vrije Universiteit: Institute for Health Care Policy and Planning; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. Community-based rehabilitation constraints and challenges. International Consultation on Reviewing CBR. Helsinki, Finland: World Health Organisation; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Finkenflugel H, Cornielje H, Velema J. The use of classification models in the evaluation of CBR programmes. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:348–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles M. Models rehabilitation and evidence of their effectiveness: production and movements of disability knowledge, skill and design within the cultures and concepts of Southern Africa. Keynote Address at the workshop on research-informed disability and rehabilitation planning for Southern Africa, April 2001:81.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma M. Viable methods for evaluation of community-based rehabilitation programmes. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:326–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannan H, Turnbull AP. A review of community based rehabilitation evaluations: quality of life as an outcome measure for future evaluations. Asia Pacif Disabil Rehabil J 2007;18:29.
   Google Scholar
• Kuipers P, Wirz S, Hartley S. Systematic synthesis of community-based rehabilitation (CBR) project evaluation reports for evidence-based policy: a proof of concept study. Int Health Human Rights 2008;8:3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wirz S, Thomas M. Evaluation of community-based rehabilitation programmes: a search for appropriate indicators. Int J Rehabil Res 2002;25:163–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley S. Commentary on ‘community based service delivery in rehabilitation: the promise and the paradox’ by Kendall, Buys and Larner. Disabil Rehabil 2001;23:26–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches'. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage Publication; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell K. Using qualitative evidence as a basis for evidence-based practice. In: Hammell K, Carpenter C, editors. Qualitative research in evidence-based rehabilitation. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2003. pp 129–143.
   Google Scholar
• Mayoux L. Qualitative methods. Internet. 2005. Electronic Citation. http://www.lindaswebs.org.uk/Page3__Orglearning/Resmeth/ResMeth.htm##Story1. Last accessed 7 July 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford G. Knowledge, power, evidence: a critical analysis of issues in evidence based practice. In: Whiteford G, Wright-St Clair V, editors. Occupation and practice in context. Sydney, NSW: Elsevier/Churchill Livingston; 2005. pp 16–33.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Br Med J 2000;321:694–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker J, Van Teijlingen E, Philip K, Shucksmith J, Penney G. Health demonstration projects: evaluating a community-based health intervention programme to improve young people's sexual health. Crit Publ Health J 2006;16:175–189.
   Google Scholar
• Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. London: Sage Publications; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring J. Case study research; principles and practices. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. London: Sage Publishers; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Tororo District Government. Tororo District Local Government District Development Plan 2007/2008–2009/2010; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Uganda. The National Strategic CBR Plan 2002/03–2006/07. Kampala, Uganda: Government of Uganda; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS). Uganda population and housing census provisional results. Uganda: National Census Office; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Claussen J, Kandyomunda B, Jareg P. Evaluation of community-based rehabilitation programme in Uganda. Final Report to the Norwegian association of the disabled. Oslo: Nordic Consulting Group; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Disabilities; from exclusion to equality, realizing the rights of persons with disabilities, United Nations, Geneva, Switzerland; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Litoselliti L. Using focus groups in research. London: Continuum; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N. Researching social life. California: Sage Publications Ltd; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer SM, Collier DA. An empirical test of the causal relationships in the Baldrige Health Care Pilot Criteria. J Operations Manage 2001;19:403–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar