Psychometric characteristics of Duruoz Hand Index in patients with traumatic hand flexor tendon injuries

References

• World Health Organization. ICF: International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Duruöz MT, Poiraudeau S, Fermanian J, Menkes CJ, Amor B, Dougados M, Revel M. Development and validation of a rheumatoid hand functional disability scale that assesses functional handicap. J Rheumatol 1996;23:1167–1172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole JL, Cordova KJ, Brower LM. Reliability and validity of a self-report of hand function in persons with rheumatoid arthritis. J Hand Ther 2006;19;12–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ŞŞahin F, Kotevoğğlu N, Taşşpıınar ŞŞ, Yıılmaz F, Kuran B. Comparison of functional disability scales and their relevance to radiological progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in remission. Clin Exp Rheum 2006;24:540–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poiraudeau S, Chevalier X, Conrozier T, Flippo RM, Lioté F, Noël E, Lefevre-Colau MM, Fermanian J, Revel M, Rhumato R. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Cochin hand functional disability scale in hand osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 2001;9:570–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brower LM, Poole JL. Reliability and validity of the Duruoz Hand Index in persons with Systemic Sclerosis (Scleroderma). Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:805–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingegnoli F, Galbiati V, Boracchi P, Comi D, Gualtierotti R, Zeni S, Fantini F. Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the hand functional disability scale in patients with systemic sclerosis. Clin Rheumatol 2008;27:743–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duruöz MT, Cerrahoğğlu L, Dinçer-Turan Y, Kürsat S. Hand function assessment in patients receiving haemodialysis. Swiss Med Wkly 2003;133:433–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezer N, Yavuzer G, Sivrioğğlu K, Basaran P, Köseoğğlu BF. Clinimetric properties of the Duruoz Hand Index in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:309–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turan Y, Duruöz MT, Aksakallıı E, Gürkan A. Validation of Duruöz Hand Index for diabetic hand dysfunction. J Investig Med 2009;57:887–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand). Am J Ind Med 1996;29:602–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 2001;14:128–146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SooHoo NF, McDonald AP, Seiler JG, McGillivary GR. Evaluation of the construct validity of the DASH questionnaire by correlation to the SF-36. J Hand Surg Am 2002;27:537–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offenbaecher M, Ewert T, Sangha O, Stucki G. Validation of a German version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH-G). J Rheumatol 2002;29:401–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Andersson B, Dahlgren E, Johansson A. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire. Reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:613–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca/assets/images/pdfs/dashturkish.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fess EE. Grip strength. Clinical assessment recommendationsIn: Casanova JS, editor. Chicago: American Society of Hand Therapists; 1992. pp 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and useNew York: Oxford University Press; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:1033–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Dekker J, de Vet HC. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:335–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81 (12 Suppl 2):S15–S20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chron Dis 1987;40:171–178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Controlled Clin Trials 1991;12 (Suppl):142S–158S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003;16:4–11.
   Google Scholar
• van de Ven-Stevens LA, Munneke M, Terwee CB, Spauwen PH, van der Linde H. Clinimetric properties of instruments to assess activities in patients with hand injury: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:151–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDermid JC. Measurement of health outcomes following tendon and nerve repair. J Hand Ther 2005;18:297–312.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dowrick AS, Gabbe BJ, Williamson OD, Cameron PA. Outcome instruments for the assessment of the upper extremity following trauma: a review. Injury 2005;36:468–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell R, Wietlisbach C. Clinical commentary in response to: clinimetric evaluation of measurement tools used in hand therapy to assess activity and participation. J Hand Ther 2009;22:237–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am 1998;23:575–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand). Am J Ind Med 1996;29:602–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDermid JC, Tottenham V. Responsiveness of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) and patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating change after hand therapy. J Hand Ther 2004;17:18–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heras-Palou C, Burke FD, Dias JJ, Bindra R. Outcome measurement in hand surgery: report of a consensus conference. Br J Hand Ther 2003;8:70–80.
   Google Scholar
• Bellace JV, Healy D, Besser MP, Byron T, Hohman L. Validity of the Dexter Evaluation System's Jamar dynamometer attachment for assessment of hand grip strength in a normal population. J Hand Ther 2000;13:46–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lagerstrom C, Nordgren B. On the reliability and usefulness of methods for grip strength measurement. Scand J Rehabil Med 1998;30:113–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shechtman O, Davenport R, Malcolm M, Nabavi D. Reliability and validity of the BTE-Primus grip tool. J Hand Ther 2003;16:36–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soyupek F, Soyupek S, Perk H, Özorak A. Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: effects on hand function. Urol Oncol 2008;26:141–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savaşş S, Köroğğlu BK, Koyuncuoğğlu HR, Uzar E, Çelik H, Tamer NM. The effects of the diabetes related soft tissue hand lesions and the reduced hand strength on functional disability of hand in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007;77:77–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duruöz MT. Romatoid El Fonksiyonel Yetersizlik Göstergesinin Klinik Değğişşime Duyarlıılıığğıı. Turk J Phys Rehab 1999;45. URL: http://www.ftrdergisi.com/eng/yazilar.asp?yaziid  ==  258&sayiid  ==  30
   Google Scholar
• MacDermid JC, Richards RS, Donner A, Bellamy N, Roth JH. Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Am 2000;25:330–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2005;30:81–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gay RE, Amadio PC, Johnson JC. Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am 2003;28:2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar