Assessments in Australian stroke rehabilitation units: a systematic review of the post-stroke validity of the most frequently used

References

• Thrift AG, Dewey HM, Macdonell RA, McNeil JJ, Donnan GA. Stroke incidence on the east coast of Australia: the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke 2000;31:2087–2092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian institute of health and welfare. Canberra, Australia: Australia's Health2010.
   Google Scholar
• Senes S. How we manage stroke in Australia. AIHW cat no CVD 31Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare2006.
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for stroke rehabilitation and recovery. Melbourne, Australia: National Stroke Audit Post Acute Services;. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. Melbourne, Australia: National Stroke Audit Post Acute Services2008.
   Google Scholar
• Scurrah A, Sheppard L, Buttner P. Effects of introducing an allied health assessment pro forma on the management of acute stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1293–1299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004;22:281–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krakauer JW. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 2006;19:84–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platz T, Eickhof C, Nuyens G, Vuadens P. Clinical scales for the assessment of spasticity, associated phenomena, and function: a systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:7–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter K, Jutai J, Teasell R, Foley N, Bitensky J, Bayley M. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Activity. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:316–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr JH, Shepherd R, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a new Motor Assessment Scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther 1985;65:175–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malouin F, Pichard L, Bonneau C, Durand A, Corriveau D. Evaluating motor recovery early after stroke: comparison of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:1206–1212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole JL, Whitney SL. Motor Assessment Scale for stroke patients: concurrent validity and interrater reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69:195–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith RA, Cowell KS. Time use of stroke patients in three rehabilitation hospitals. Soc Sci Med 1987;24:529–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timbeck RJ, Spaulding SJ. Ability of the functional independence measure to predict rehabilitation outcomes after stroke: a review of the literature. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 2003;22:63–76.
   Google Scholar
• Zwecker M, Levenkrohn S, Fleisig Y, Zeilig G, Ohry A, Adunsky A. Mini-mental state examination, cognitive FIM instrument, and the Loewenstein occupational therapy cognitive assessment: relation to functional outcome of stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:342–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black TM, Soltis T, Bartlett C. Using the functional independence measure instrument to predict stroke rehabilitation outcomes. Rehabil Nurs 1999;24:109–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fong KN, Chan CC, Au DK. Relationship of motor and cognitive abilities to functional performance in stroke rehabilitation. Brain Inj 2001;15:443–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inouye M, Kishi K, Ikeda Y, Takada M, Katoh J, Iwahashi M, Hayakawa M, Ishihara K, Sawamura S, Kazumi T. Prediction of functional outcome after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000;79:513–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandstrom R, Mokler PJ, Hoppe KM. Discharge destination and motor function outcome in severe stroke as measured by the functional independence measure/function-related group classification system. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:762–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, Moreland J, Torresin W, Van Hullenaar S, Sanford J, Barreca S, Vanspall B, Plews N. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke 1993;24:58–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health 1992;83:S7–S11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI. The Balance Scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med 1995;27:27–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blum L, Korner-Bitensky N. Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther 2008;88:559–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butland RJ, Pang J, Gross ER, Woodcock AA, Geddes DM. Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982;284:1607–1678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flansbjer UB, Holmback AM, Downham D, Patten C, Lexell J. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:75–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulk GD, Echternach JL, Nof L, O'Sullivan S. Clinometric properties of the six-minute walk test in individuals undergoing rehabilitation poststroke. Physiother Theory Pract 2008;24:195–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collen FM, Wade DT, Bradshaw CM. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Stud 1990;12:6–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wade DT, Wood VA, Heller A, Maggs J, Langton Hewer R. Walking after stroke. Measurement and recovery over the first 3 months. Scand J Rehabil Med 1987;19:25–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rossier P, Wade DT. Validity and reliability comparison of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:9–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39:142–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng SS, Hui-Chan CW. The timed up & go test: its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1641–1647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy MA, Roberts-Warrior D. A review of motor performance measures and treatment interventions for patients with stroke. Top Geriatr Rehabil 2003;19:3–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agre JC, Magness JL, Hull SZ, Wright KC, Baxter TL, Patterson R, Stradel L. Strength testing with a portable dynamometer: reliability for upper and lower extremities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987;68:454–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW. Internal consistency of dynamometer measurements in healthy subjects and stroke patients. Percept Mot Skills 1995;81:1113–1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Assessment of strength deficits in eight paretic upper extremity muscle groups of stroke patients with hemiplegia. Phys Ther 1987;67:522–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW. Adequacy of hand-grip dynamometry for characterizing upper limb strength after stroke. Isokinet Exerc Sci 2004;12:263–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lannin N. Reliability, validity and factor structure of the upper limb subscale of the Motor Assessment Scale (UL-MAS) in adults following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:109–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh IP, Hsieh CL. Responsiveness of two upper extremity function instruments for stroke inpatients receiving rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2002;16:617–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering RL, Hubbard IJ, Baker KG, Parsons MP. Assessment of the upper limb in acute stroke: the validity of hierarchal scoring for the Motor Assessment Scale. Aust Occup Ther J 2010;57:174–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabari JS, Lim AL, Velozo CA, Lehman L, Kieran O, Lai JS. Assessing arm and hand function after stroke: a validity test of the hierarchical scoring system used in the Motor Assessment Scale for stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1609–1615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Kashman N, Vollard G. Adult norms for the nine-hole peg test of finger dexterity. Occup Ther J Res 1985;5:24–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford Grice K, Vogel KA, Le V, Mitchell A, Muniz S, Vollmer MA. Adult norms for a commercially available nine hole peg test for finger dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 2003;57:570–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croarkin E, Danoff J, Barnes C. Evidence-based rating of upper-extremity motor function tests used for people following a stroke. Phys Ther 2004;84:62–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1969;50:311–319.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudman D, Hannah S. An instrument evaluation framework: description and application to assessments of hand function. J Hand Ther 1998;11:266–277.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 1987;67:206–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandyan AD, Johnson GR, Price CI, Curless RH, Barnes MP, Rodgers H. A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth Scales as measures of spasticity. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:373–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan RL, Sinclair E, Thompson J, Taylor S, Pentland B. Inter-rater reliability of the modified Ashworth Scale for spasticity in hemiplegic patients. Int J Rehabil Res 1992;15:158–161.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Hasson S, Mousakhani A, Nouriyan A, Omidvar Z. Inter-rater reliability of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale as a clinical tool in measurements of post-stroke elbow flexor spasticity. Neuro Rehabilitation 2009;24:225–229.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn M, Vliet P, Mockett SP. Reliability of measurements obtained with the modified Ashworth scale in the lower extremities of people with stroke. Phys Ther 2002;82:25–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin FM, Sabbahi M. Correlation of spasticity with hyperactive stretch reflexes and motor dysfunction in hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:526–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Meissner D, Grundmann K, Zange C, Koch R, Pohl M. Reliability of the Modified Tardieu Scale and the Modified Ashworth Scale in adult patients with severe brain injury: a comparison study. Clin Rehabil 2005;19:751–759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardieu G, Shentoub S, Delarue R. A la recherche´ d'une technique de mesure de la spasticite. Rev Neurol 1954;91:143–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held J, Pierrot-Deseilligny E. Reeducation motrice des affections neurologiques. J B Bailliere1969.
   Google Scholar
• Haugh AB, Pandyan AD, Johnson GR. A systematic review of the Tardieu Scale for the measurement of spasticity. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:899–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke DM, McKenna K, Fleming J. Development of a standardized occupational therapy screening tool for visual perception in adults. Scand J Occup Ther 2005;12:59–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooke DM, McKenna K, Fleming J, Darnell R. Construct and ecological validity of the Occupational Therapy Adult Perceptual Screening Test (OT-APST). Scand J Occup Ther 2006;13:49–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooke DM, McKenna K, Fleming J, Darnell R. Criterion validity of the Occupational Therapy Adult Perceptual Screening Test (OT-APST). Scand J Occup Ther 2006;13:38–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz N, Itzkovich M, Averbuch S, Elazar B. Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA) battery for brain-injured patients: reliability and validity. Am J Occup Ther 1989;43:184–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz N, Hefner D, Reuben R, Johnson JA. Measuring clinical change in cognitive rehabilitation of patients with brain damage: two cases, traumatic brain injury and cerebral vascular accident. Occupational therapy approaches to traumatic brain injury. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press1990. pp 23–43.
   Google Scholar
• Katz N, Hartman-Maeir A, Ring H, Soroker N. Relationships of cognitive performance and daily function of clients following right hemisphere stroke: predictive and ecological validity of the LOTCA battery. Occup Ther J Res 2000;20:3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snellen H. Optotypi ad visum determinandum. Utrecht1862.
   Google Scholar
• Semmes J. Somatosensory changes after penetrating brain wounds in man. Cambridge: Harvard University Press1960.
   Google Scholar
• Winward CE, Halligan PW, Wade DT. The Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Performance (RASP): standardization and reliability data. Clin Rehabil 2002;16:523–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln N, Crow J, Jackson J, Waters G, Adams S, Hodgson P. The unreliability of sensory assessment. Clin Rehabil 1991;5:273–282.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln NB, Jackson JM, Adams SA. Reliability and revision of the Nottingham sensory assessment for stroke patients. Physiotherapy 1998;84:358–365.
   Google Scholar
• Gaubert CS, Mockett SP. Inter-rater reliability of the Nottingham method of stereognosis assessment. Clin Rehabil 2000;14:153–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-Mental State: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adunsky A, Fleissig Y, Levenkrohn S, Arad M, Noy S. Clock drawing task, mini-mental state examination and cognitive-functional independence measure: relation to functional outcome of stroke patients. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2002;35:153–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrell B, Dehlin O. Mini mental state examination in geriatric stroke patients. Validity, differences between subgroups of patients, and relationships to somatic and mental variables. Aging (Milano) 2000;12:439–444.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiernan RJ, Mueller J, Langston JW, Van Dyke C. The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination: a brief but quantitative approach to cognitive assessment. Ann Intern Med 1987;107:481–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nokleby K, Boland E, Bergersen H, Schanke AK, Farner L, Wagle J, Wyller TB. Screening for cognitive deficits after stroke: a comparison of three screening tools. Clin Rehabil 2008;22:1095–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz N, Itzkovich M, Averbuch S, Elazar B. Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA) battery for brain-injured patients: reliability and validity. Am J Occup Ther 1989;43:184–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosseau L, Potvin L, Philippe P, Boulanger Y, Dutil E. The construct validity of the functional independence measure as applied to stroke patients. Physiother Theory Pract 1996;12:161–171.
   Google Scholar
• Werner RA. Predicting outcome after acute stroke with the functional independence measure. Top Stroke Rehabil 1994;1:30–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger C. Measurement characteristics of the functional independence measure. Top Stroke Rehabil 1994;1:1–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J 1965;14:61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huybrechts KF, Caro JJ. The Barthel Index and Modified Rankin Scale as prognostic tools for long-term outcomes after stroke: a qualitative review of the literature. Curr Med Res Opin 2007;23:1627–1636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green J, Forster A, Young J. A test-retest reliability study of the Barthel Index, the Rivermead Mobility Index, the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale and the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil 2001;23:670–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlden H, Edwards M, McNeil J, Greenwood R. Use of the Barthel Index and the functional independence measure during early inpatient rehabilitation after single incident brain injury. Clin Rehabil 2006;20:153–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosman-Hedstrom G, Svensson E. Parallel reliability of the functional independence measure and the Barthel ADL index. Disabil Rehabil 2000;22:702–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett JA. Bladder and bowel problems after stroke. Rev Clin Gerontol 2002;12:253–267.
   Google Scholar
• Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil 1987;1:6–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wikander B, Ekelund P, Milsom I. An evaluation of multidisciplinary intervention governed by functional independence measure (FIMSM) in incontinent stroke patients. Scand J Rehabil Med 1998;30:15–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shewan CM, Kertesz A. Reliability and validity characteristics of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB). J Speech Hear Disord 1980;45:308–324.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bakheit AM, Carrington S, Griffiths S, Searle K. High scores on the Western Aphasia Battery correlate with good functional communication skills (as measured with the Communicative Effectiveness Index) in aphasic stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:287–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross KB, Wertz RT. Discriminative validity of selected measures for differentiating normal from aphasic performance. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2003;12:312–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borod JC, Goodglass H, Kaplan E. Normative data on the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination, parietal lobe battery, and the Boston Naming Test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1980;2:209–215.
   Google Scholar
• Naeser MA, Hayward RW. Lesion localization in aphasia with cranial computed tomography and the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Exam. Neurology 1978;28:545–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enderby P. Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment. Austin: Pro-ED1983.
   Google Scholar
• Salter K, Jutai J, Foley N, Hellings C, Teasell R. Identification of aphasia post stroke: a review of screening assessment tools. Brain Inj 2006;20:559–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enderby P, Wood VA, Wade DT, Hewer RL. Aphasia after stroke: a detailed study of recovery in the first 3 months. Int Rehabil Med 1987;8:162–165.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Enderby PM, Wood VA, Wade DT, Hewer RL. The Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test: a short, simple test for aphasia appropriate for non-specialists. Int Rehabil Med 1987;8:166–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Enderby P, Crow E. Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test: validity and comparability. Disabil Rehabil 1996;18:238–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoo JB, Buller AS, Wong MC. Modified barium swallow examination in dysphagic stroke patients. Singapore Med J 1996;37:407–410.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Logemann JA. Role of the modified barium swallow in management of patients with dysphagia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;116:335–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward E, Conroy, AL. Validity, reliability and respsonsitivity of the royal Brisbane hospital dysphagia outcome measure for swallowing. Asia Pac J Speech Lang Hear 1999;4:109–129.
   Google Scholar
• Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland GD, Adams J, Rubenstein LZ. Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet 1993;342:1032–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley NC, Salter KL, Robertson J, Teasell RW, Woodbury MG. Which reported estimate of the prevalence of malnutrition after stroke is valid? Stroke 2009;40:e66–e74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guigoz Y. The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) review of the literature – What does it tell us? J Nutr Health Aging 2006;10:466–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, Leirer VO. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 1982;17:37–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang WK, Chan SS, Chiu HF, Wong KS, Kwok TC, Mok V, Ungvari GS. Can the Geriatric Depression Scale detect poststroke depression in Chinese elderly? J Affect Disord 2004;81:153–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67:361–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aben I, Verhey F, Lousberg R, Lodder J, Honig A. Validity of the Beck Depression Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, SCL-90, and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as screening instruments for depression in stroke patients. Psychosomatics 2002;43:386–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston M, Pollard B, Hennessey P. Construct validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale with clinical populations. J Psychosom Res 2000;48:579–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961;4:561–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck AT, Rush AJ, Shaw BF, Emery D. Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press1979.
   Google Scholar
• Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin GM. Psychometric properties of the beck depression inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev 1988;8:77–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck AT, Steer RA. Internal consistencies of the original and revised beck depression inventory. J Clin Psychol 1984;40:1365–1357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh IP, Lin JH, Jeng JS, Hsieh CL. Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the functional independence measure, 5 item Barthel index, and 10 item Barthel index in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;73:188–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari NN, Naghdi S. Inter-and intrarater reliability of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with knee extensor poststroke spasticity. Physiother Theory Pract 2008;24:205–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carey LM, Matyas TA, Oke LE. Evaluation of impaired fingertip texture discrimination and wrist position sense in patients affected by stroke: comparison of clinical and new quantitative measures. J Hand Ther 2002;15:71–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwon S, Hartzema AG, Duncan PW, Min-Lai S. Disability measures in stroke: relationship among the Barthel Index, the functional independence measure, and the Modified Rankin Scale. Stroke 2004;35:918–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg A, Lonnqvist J, Palomaki H, Kaste M. Assessment of depression after stroke: a comparison of different screening instruments. Stroke 2009;40:523–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar