The consultation and relational empathy measure: an investigation of its scaling structure

References

• Lord Darzi of Denham. High quality care for all: NHS Next Stage Review final report. Department of Health; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Guidance on the routine collection of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). For the NHS in England 2009/10; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Dibbelt S, Schaidhammer M, Fleischer C, Greitemann B. Patient-doctor interaction in rehabilitation: The relationship between perceived interaction quality and long-term treatment results. Patient Educ Couns 2009;76:328–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howie JGR, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M, Walker JJ, Freeman GK, Rai H. Quality at general practice consultations: Cross sectional survey. BMJ 1999;319:738–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer SW, Watt GCM. Empathy is important for enablement. BMJ 2001;322:865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield B, Keough E, Linn S, Little D, Portela C. The meaning of caring from the perspectives of patients undergoing physical therapy: A pilot study. J Allied Health 2010;39:43–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall AM, Ferreira PH, Maher CG, Latimer J, Ferreira ML. The influence of the therapist-patient relationship on treatment outcome in physical rehabilitation: A systematic review. Phys Ther 2010;90:1099–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod R, McPherson KM. Care and compassion: Part of person-centred rehabilitation, inappropriate response or a forgotten art? Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1589–1595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley J, Kayes NM, McPherson KM. Assessing Therapeutic Relationships in Physiotherapy: Literature Review. New Zeal J Physiotherapy. 2011;39:81–91. (In press).
   Google Scholar
• Beattie P, Turner C, Dowda M, Michener L, Nelson R. The MedRisk instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with physical therapy care: A psychometric analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005;35:24–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole MB, McLean V. Therapeutic relationships re-defined. Occup Ther Ment Health 2003;19:33–56.
   Google Scholar
• Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Measuring for quality improvement in physiotherapy. (cited 28 Jan 2011). Available from: http://www.csp.org.uk/topics/measuring-quality-improvement-physiotherapy.
   Google Scholar
• French S, Sim J. Physiotherapy. A psychosocial approach. 3rd Edn. Butterworth: Heinemann; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer SW, Maxwell M, Heaney D, Watt GC. The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: Development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Fam Pract 2004;21:699–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer SW, Reynolds WJ. Empathy and quality of care. Br J Gen Pract 2002;52:9–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiblum SR, Schnall E, Seehuus M, DeMaria A. To BATHE or not to BATHE: Patient satisfaction with visits to their family physician. Fam Med 2008;40:407–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David L, Freeman G. Improving consultation skills using cognitive-behavioural therapy: A new ‘cognitive-behavioural model’ for general practice. Educ Prim Care 2006;17:443–452.
   Google Scholar
• Morse DS, Edwardsen EA, Gordon HS. Missed opportunities for interval empathy in lung cancer communication. Arch Int Med 2008;168:1853–1858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds W. The measurement and development of empathy in nursing. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ, Mangione S, Veloksi JJ, Magee M. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: Further psychometric data and differences by gender and specialty at item level. Acad Med 2002;77:58–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacPherson H, Mercer SW, Scullion T, Thomas KJ. Empathy, enablement, and outcome: an exploratory study on acupuncture patients’ perceptions. J Altern Complement Med 2003;9:869–876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer SW, Hatch DJ, Murray A, Murphy DJ, Eva KW. Capturing patients’ views on communication with anaesthetists: The CARE Measure. Clin Governance 2008;13:128–137.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer SW, McConnachie A, Maxwell M, Heaney D, Watt GC. Relevance and practical use of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in general practice. Fam Pract 2005;22:328–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer SW, Murphy DJ. Validity and reliability of the CARE Measure in secondary care. Clin Governance 2008;13:269–283.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer SW, Neumann M, Wirtz M, Fitzpatrick B, Vojt G. General practitioner empathy, patient enablement, and patient-reported outcomes in primary care in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland-A pilot prospective study using structural equation modeling. Pat Educ Couns 2008;73:240–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer SW, Howie JG. CQI-2-a new measure of holistic interpersonal care in primary care consultations. Br J Gen Pract 2006;56:262–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsudaira T, Igarashi H, Kikuchi H, Kano R, Mitoma H, Ohuchi K, et al. Factor structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Japanese psychiatric outpatient and student populations. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2009;7: Article Number 42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright BD. Comparing Rasch measurement and factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling 1996;3:3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer SW. The CARE measure. [cited 28 Jan 2011]. Available from http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/generalpracticeprimarycare/research/caremeasure/downloads/.
   Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to their development and use. 4 ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. pp. 87–89.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Spss Inc, SPSS 15.0 for Windows. Release 15.0.1. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Horn JL. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrica 1965;30:179–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters G. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrica 1982;47:149–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (revised and expanded ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1960/1980.
   Google Scholar
• Andrich D, lyne A, Sheridan B, Luo G. RUMM 2020. Perth: RUMM Laboratory; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Andrich D. Rasch models for measurement series: Quantitative applications in the social sciences no. 68. London: Sage Publications; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model. Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Wright BD. Reliability and separation. Rasch Measurement Transactions 1996;9:472.
   Google Scholar
• Wright BD, Stone MH. Best test design. Chicago: Mesa press; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Grimby G. Useful reporting of DIF. Rasch Measurement Transactions 1998;12:651.
   Google Scholar
• Holland PW, Wainer H. Differential Item Functioning. NJ: Hillsdale. Lawrence Erlbaum; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Sherridan B, Andrich D. Extending the RUM2030 analysis. Perth: RUMM Laboratory; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Smith EV. Detecting and evaluation the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meast 2002;3:205–231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tennant A, Pallant JF. Unidimensionality matters! (a tale of two Smiths?). Rasch Measurement Transactions 2006;20:1048–1051.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Sample size and item calibration [or Person Measure] stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions 1994;7:328.
   Google Scholar
• Wright BD, Tennant A. Sample size again. Rasch Measurement Transactions 1996;9:468.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher W Jr. Reliability Statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions 1992;6:238.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer SW. Practitioner empathy, patient enablement and health outcomes of patients attending the Glasgow Homoeopathic Hospital: A retrospective and prospective comparison. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 2005;155:498–501.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Renzi C, Abeni D, Picardi A, Agostini E, Melchi CF, Pasquini P, et al. Factors associated with patient satisfaction with care among dermatological outpatients. Br J Dermatol 2001;145:617–623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper K, Smith BH, Hancock E. Patient-centredness in physiotherapy from the perspective of the chronic low back pain patient. Physiotherapy 2008;94:244–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen KB, Kreiner S. Monte Carlo tests of the Rasch model based on scalability coefficients. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2010;63:101–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesio L, Simone A, Bernardinello M. Rehabilitation and outcome measurement: where is Rasch analysis-going? Europa Medicophysica 2007;43:417–426.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar