Barriers to implementation of stroke rehabilitation evidence: findings from a multi-site pilot project

References

• Teasell RW, Foley NC, Bhogal SK, Speechley MR. An evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil 2003;10:29–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korner-Bitensky N, Teasell R, Baum C, Zeltzer L, Paul P. ccessed Stroke Engine (Internet) McGill University: Montreal, Canada cited May 12,2011. Available at: www.Strokengine.ca.
   Google Scholar
• Korner-Bitensky N, Desrosiers J, Rochette A. A national survey of occupational therapists’ practices related to participation post-stroke. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:291–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochette A, Korner-Bitensky N, Desrosiers J. Actual vs best practice for families post-stroke according to three rehabilitation disciplines. J Rehabil Med 2007;39:513–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon-Nair A, Korner-Bitensky N, Ogourtsova T. Occupational therapists’ identification, assessment and treatment of unilateral spatial neglect during stroke rehabilitation in Canada. Stroke 2007;38:2556–2562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumoulin C, Korner-Bitensky N, Tannenbaum C. The cross Canada study of stroke rehabilitation: finding on the identification, assessment and management of urinary incontinence after stroke.Stroke 2007;38:2745–2751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Horner RD, Reker DM, Samsa GP, Hoenig H, Hamilton B, LaClair BJ, Dudley TK. Adherence to postacute rehabilitation guidelines is associated with functional recovery in stroke. Stroke 2002;33:167–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomas MA. Getting research findings into practice. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ 1998;317:465–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA 1995;274:700–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ 1995;153:1423–1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw J, Shirran L, Thomas R, Mowatt G, Fraser C, Bero L, Grilli R et al. Changing provider behaviour: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care 2001;39:II-2–II-45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw JM, Thomas R, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay C, Vale L, Whitty P et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Tech Assess 8; 2004. Available at: http://www.ncchta.org/project.asp?PjtId=994. Accessed on May 11, 2011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon A, Korner-Bitensky N, Kastner M, McKibbon KA, Straus S. Strategies for rehabilitation professionals to move evidence-based knowledge into practice: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:1024–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation (Internet) London, Ontario, Canada cited May 11, 2011. Available at: www.ebrsr.com. Accessed on May 11, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bayley MT, Hurdowar A, Teasell R, Wood-Dauphinee S, Korner-Bitensky N, Richards CL, Harrison M, Jutai JW. Priorities for stroke rehabilitation and research: results of a 2003 Canadian Stroke Network consensus conference. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:526–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroke Unit Trialists’ CollaborationOrganised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;4: CD000197.
   Google Scholar
• Indredavik B, Rohweder G, Naalsund E, Lydersen S. Medical complications in a comprehensive stroke unit and an early supported discharge service. Stroke 2008;39:414–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seenan P, Long M, Langhorne P. Stroke units in their natural habitat: systematic review of observational studies. Stroke 2007;38:1886–1892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra L, Langhorne P. Facilitating recovery: evidence for organized stroke care. J Rehabil Med 2007;39:97–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham ID, Harrison MB, Brouwers M, Davies BL, Dunn S. Facilitating the use of evidence in practice: evaluating and adapting clinical practice guidelines for local use by health care organizations. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2002;31:599–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurdowar A, Graham I, Bayley MT, Wood Dauphinee S. Quality of Published Guidelines in Stroke Care. J Eval Clin Practi 2007;15:1035–1042.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Stroke Best Practice Guidelines, Canadian Stroke Network, Ottawa, Canada. Available at: www.strokebestpractices.ca/index.php/stroke-rehabilitation/. Accessed May 15, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• DiCenso A, Bajnok I, Borycki E, Devies B, Graham I, Harrison M, Logan J, et al. Toolkit: Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (2002). Toronto, Canada. Available at: http://www.rnao.org/Page.asp?PageID=924&ContentID=823. Accessed May 15, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lam WW, Fielding R, Johnston JM, Tin KY, Leung GM. Identifying barriers to the adoption of evidence-based medicine practice in clinical clerks: a longitudinal focus group study. Med Educ 2004;38:987–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl A, Smith H, White P, Field J. General practitioner’s perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey. BMJ 1998;316:361–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeodu A, Agius R, Madan I. Attitudes and barriers to evidence-based guidelines among UK occupational physicians. Occup Med (Lond) 2009;59:586–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grol R, Wensing M. What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust 2004;180:S57–S60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette DU, Bacon K, Batty C, Carlson M, Ferland A, Hemingway RD, Hill JC, et al. Evidence-based practice: beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of physical therapists. Phys Ther 2003;83:786–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salbach NM, Guilcher SJ, Jaglal SB, Davis DA. Determinants of research use in clinical decision making among physical therapists providing services post-stroke: a cross-sectional study. Implement Sci 2010;5:77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salbach NM, Jaglal SB, Korner-Bitensky N, Rappolt S, Davis D. Practitioner and organizational barriers to evidence-based practice of physical therapists for people with stroke. Phys Ther 2007;87:1284–1303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappolt S, Pearce K, McEwen S, Polatajko HJ. Exploring organizational characteristics associated with practice changes following a mentored online educational module. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2005;25:116–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock AS, Legg L, Langhorne P, Sellars C. Barriers to achieving evidence-based stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2000;14:611–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett S, Tooth L, McKenna K, Rodger S, Strong J, Ziviani J, Mickan S. et al. Perceptions of evidence-based practice: a survey of occupational therapists. Aust Occup Ther J 2003;50:13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson K, Lewis M, Hay E. Physiotherapist attitudes toward evidence-based practice change as a result of an evidence-based educational program. J Eval Clin Pract 2004;10:207–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysart AM, Tomlin GS. Factors related to evidence-based practice among U.S. occupational therapy clinicians. Am J Occup Ther 2002;56:275–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar