Staff perceptions of using outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation

References

• National Audit Office. Progress in improving stroke care. London: The Stationery Office; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. National stroke strategy. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National Clinical Guideline for stroke, 3rd Ed. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Darzi A. High quality care for all. London: Department of Health; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Turner-Stokes T. The use of standardized outcome measures in rehabilitation centres in the UK. Clin Rehabil 1997;11:306–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner A, Turner-Stokes L. The use of standardized outcome measures in rehabilitation centres in the UK. Clin Rehabil 2006;20:609–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the barthel index. Md State Med J 1965;14:61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torenbeek M, Caulfield B, Garrett M, Van Harten W. Current use of outcome measures for stroke and low back pain rehabilitation in five European countries: first results of the ACROSS project. Int J Rehabil Res 2001;24:95–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Jorgensen HS, Wade DT. Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke 2000;31:1429–1438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland JM, Taylor WJ, Dean SG. Factors influencing the use of outcome measures for patients with low back pain: a survey of New Zealand physical therapists. Phys Ther 2008;88:1492–1505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette DU, Halbert J, Iverson C, Miceli E, Shah P. Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications. Phys Ther 2009;89:125–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinkels RA, van Peppen RP, Wittink H, Custers JW, Beurskens AJ. Current use and barriers and facilitators for implementation of standardised measures in physical therapy in the Netherlands. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011;12:106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Peppen RPS. Towards evidence-based physiotherapy for patients with stroke. PhD Thesis. Utrecht University & Hogeschool Utrecht; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Abrams D, Davidson M, Harrick J, Harcourt P, Zylinski M, Clancy J. Monitoring the change: current trends in outcome measure usage in physiotherapy. Man Ther 2006;11:46–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes EK, O’Neill D. Use of outcome measures in physiotherapy practice in ireland from 1998 to 2003 and comparison to Canadian trends. Physiother Can 2008;60:109–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fung CH, Hays RD. Prospects and challenges in using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. Qual Life Res 2008;17:1297–1302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman M, Chelminski I, Young D, Dalrymple K. Using outcome measures to promote better outcomes. Clin Neuropsychiatry 2011;8:28–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bausewein C, Simon ST, Benalia H, Downing J, Mwangi-Powell FN, Daveson BA, Harding R, Higginson IJ; PRISMA. Implementing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in palliative care–users’ cry for help. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2011;9:27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh R, Tennant A, Biering-Sørensen F, Grimby G, Marincek C, Phillips S, Ring H, et al. The use of outcome measures in physical medicine and rehabilitation within Europe. J Rehabil Med 2001;33:273–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesson R, Macleod M, Massie S. Outcome measures used in therapy departments in Scotland. Physiotherapy 1996;82:673–679.
   Google Scholar
• Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Gayton D. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiother Can 1989;41:304–331.
   Google Scholar
• van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988;19:604–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989;20:864–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Kashman N, Volland G. Adult norms for the nine hole peg test of finger dexterity. Occup Ther J Res 1985;5:24–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Outcome measures for clinical rehabilitation trials: impairment, function, quality of life, or value? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:S26–S31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh J, Flynn R, Long AF, Tyson S. Tacit and encoded knowledge in the use of standardised outcome measures in multidisciplinary team decision making: a case study of in-patient neurorehabilitation. Soc Sci Med 2008;67:183–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyson S, Greenhalgh J, Long AF, Flynn R. The use of measurement tools in clinical practice: an observational study of neurorehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2010;24:74–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyson SF, Greenhalgh J, Long AF, Flynn R. The influence of objective measurement tools on communication and clinical decision making in neurological rehabilitation. J Eval Clin Pract 2012;18:216–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians. National Sentinel Stroke Clinical Audit 2010 Round 7: Public report for England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Prepared on behalf of the Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. London: RCP; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan JE, Andrews AW, Lanzino D, Perron AE, Peron A, Potter KA. Outcome measures in neurological physical therapy practice: part II. A patient-centered process. J Neurol Phys Ther 2011;35:65–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinober BW. Which outcome measure? Physiotherapy 1995;81:185–186.
   Google Scholar