Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH): long-term cognitive outcome in patients treated with surgical clipping or endovascular coiling

References

• van Gijn J, Kerr RS, Rinkel GJ. Subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet 2007;369:306–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hop JW, Rinkel GJ, Algra A, van Gijn J. Case-fatality rates and functional outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review. Stroke 1997;28:660–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer SA, Kreiter KT, Copeland D, Bernardini GL, Bates JE, Peery S, Claassen J, et al. Global and domain-specific cognitive impairment and outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology 2002;59:1750–1758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hütter BO, Gilsbach JM. Which neuropsychological deficits are hidden behind a good outcome (Glasgow = I) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage? Neurosurgery 1993;33:999–1005; discussion 1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden JA, Utley T, Mee EW. Neurological and psychosocial outcome 4 to 7 years after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1997;41:25–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackett ML, Anderson CS. Health outcomes 1 year after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology 2000;55:658–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell J, Kitchen N, Heslin J, Greenwood R. Psychosocial outcomes at 18 months after good neurological recovery from aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 2004;75:1119–1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden JA, Mee EW, Henning M. A prospective study of impairment of cognition and memory and recovery after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1993;33:572–86; discussion 586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hütter BO, Gilsbach JM, Kreitschmann I. Quality of life and cognitive deficits after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Br J Neurosurg 1995;9:465–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell J, Kitchen N, Heslin J, Greenwood R. Psychosocial outcomes at three and nine months after good neurological recovery from aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: predictors and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 2002;72:772–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott RB, Eccles F, Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Rothwell PM, Carpenter K. Improved cognitive outcomes with endovascular coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: neuropsychological outcomes from the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 2010;41:1743–1747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasdale GM, Drake CG, Hunt W, Kassell N, Sano K, Pertuiset B, De Villiers JC. A universal subarachnoid haemorrhage scale: report of a committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 1988;51:1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988;19:604–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadjivassiliou M, Tooth CL, Romanowski CA, Byrne J, Battersby RD, Oxbury S, Crewswell CS, et al. Aneurysmal SAH: cognitive outcome and structural damage after clipping or coiling. Neurology 2001;56:1672–1677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan A, Ho S, Poon WS. Neuropsychological sequelae of patients treated with microsurgical clipping or endovascular embolization for anterior communicating artery aneurysm. Eur Neurol 2002;47:37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellebaum C, Schäfers L, Schoch B, Wanke I, Stolke D, Forsting M, Daum I. Clipping versus coiling: neuropsychological follow up after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2004;26:1081–1092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proust F, Martinaud O, Gérardin E, Derrey S, Levèque S, Bioux S, Tollard E, et al. Quality of life and brain damage after microsurgical clip occlusion or endovascular coil embolization for ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms: neuropsychological assessment. J Neurosurg 2009;110:19–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt WE, Hess RM. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1968;28:14–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson HE. National adult reading test (NART): test manual. Windsor, Berks: NFER-Nelson; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Psychological Corporation. Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence (WASI). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson IH, Ward Y, Ridgeway V, Nimmo-Smith I. The test of everyday attention. Bury St Edmunds: Thames Valley Test; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess P, Shallice T. The hayling and brixton tests: test manual. Bury St Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess PW, Alderman N, Evans J, Emslie H, Wilson BA. The ecological validity of tests of executive function. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1998;4:547–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler Memory Scale manual. 3rd ed. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67:361–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell JH, Beckers K, Greenwood RJ. Measuring progress and outcome in community rehabilitation after brain injury with a new assessment instrument–the BICRO-39 scales. Brain Injury Community Rehabilitation Outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:1213–1225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk RE. Practical significance: a concept whose time has come. Edu Psychol Measure 1996;56:746–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton MT, Gress DR, Higashida RT, editors. Controversies in neurological surgery: neurovascular diseases. New York: Thieme Medical Pub Inc; 2006.
   Google Scholar