Needs, priorities, and desired rehabilitation outcomes of family members of young adults who have had a stroke: findings from a phenomenological study

References

• Visser-Meily A, Post M, Gorter JW, Berlekom SB, Van Den Bos T, Lindeman E. Rehabilitation of stroke patients needs a family-centred approach. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1557–1561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholte op Reimer WJ, de Haan RJ, Rijnders PT, Limburg M, van den Bos GA. The burden of caregiving in partners of long-term stroke survivors. Stroke 1998;29:1605–1611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secrest J. Transformation of the relationship: the experience of primary support persons of stroke survivors. Rehabil Nurs 2000;25:93–99.
   Google Scholar
• Banks P, Pearson C. Parallel lives: younger stroke survivors and their partners coping with crisis. Sex Relation Ther 2004;19:413–429.
   Google Scholar
• Smith LN, Norrie J, Kerr SM, Lawrence IM, Langhorne P, Lees KR. Impact and influences on caregiver outcomes at one year post-stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;18:145–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith LN, Lawrence M, Kerr SM, Langhorne P, Lees KR. Informal carers’ experience of caring for stroke survivors. J Adv Nurs 2004;46:235–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood N, Mackenzie A, Cloud GC, Wilson N. Informal primary carers of stroke survivors living at home-challenges, satisfactions and coping: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:337–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellerin C, Rochette A, Racine E. Social participation of relatives post-stroke: the role of rehabilitation and related ethical issues. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:1055–1064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You RX, McNeil JJ, O’Malley HM, Davis SM, Thrift AG, Donnan GA. Risk factors for stroke due to cerebral infarction in young adults. Stroke 1997;28:1913–1918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corr S, Wilmer S. Returning to Work after a Stroke: an important but neglected area. Br Jnl Occ Ther 2003; 66:186–192.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians (RCP). National clinical guidelines for stroke. 3rd ed. London: RCP; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Morris R. The psychology of stroke in young adults: the roles of service provision and return to work. Stroke Res Treat 2011;2011:534812.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Immenschuh U. ‘My arm and leg - they are just sleeping’ Perspectives of younger people on their experience of having a stroke. Ph.D. thesis. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Stone SD. Reactions to invisible disability: the experiences of young women survivors of hemorrhagic stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:293–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence M. Young adults’ experience of stroke: a qualitative review of the literature. Br J Nurs 2010;19:241–248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lawrence M. Patient-centred stroke care: young adults and their families. Ph.D. thesis. Glasgow: Glasgow Caledonian University; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence M, Kinn S. Defining and measuring patient-centred care: an example from a mixed methods systematic review of the stroke literature. Health Expect 2011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1369–7625.2011.00683.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright L, Leahey M. Nurses and Families: A guide to family assessment and intervention. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer S, Glass T. Family function and stroke recovery: a review. Rehabil Psychol 2003;48:255–265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster AL, Armstrong J, Buckley A, Sherry J, Young T, Foliaki S, James-Hogaia J, Theadom A, McPherson K. Encouraging family engagement in the rehabilitation process; a rehabilitation provider’s development of support strategies for family members of people with traumatic brain injury. Disabil Rehabil 2012; Early Online:1–8
   Google Scholar
• McKevitt C, Redfern J, Mold F, Wolfe C. Qualitative studies of stroke: a systematic review. Stroke 2004;35:1499–1505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guideline for stroke. 3rd ed. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Miller EL, Murray L, Richards L, Zorowitz RD, Bakas T, Clark P, Billinger SA; American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and the Stroke Council. Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2010;41:2402–2448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Guideline 118: Management of patients with stroke: rehabilitation, prevention and management of complications, and discharge planning. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron JI, Gignac MA. “Timing It Right”: a conceptual framework for addressing the support needs of family caregivers to stroke survivors from the hospital to the home. Patient Educ Couns 2008;70:305–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew N. The primacy of intersubjectivity. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 2008;31:E74–E80.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty M. The Phenomenology of perception. (Smith C. trans, ed). London: Routledge Classics; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett R, Immink MA, Hillier S. Becoming connected: the lived experience of yoga participation after stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:2404–2415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence M, Kinn S. Determining the needs, priorities, and desired rehabilitation outcomes of young adults who have had a stroke. Rehabil Res Pract 2012;Article ID 963978, 9 pages, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Smout S, Koudstaal PJ, Ribbers GM, Janssen WG, Passchier J. Struck by stroke: a pilot study exploring quality of life and coping patterns in younger patients and spouses. Int J Rehabil Res 2001;24:261–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corr S. Life after stroke: the characteristics of those aged 18 to 55 years and an evaluation of a support service. Ph.D. thesis (PhD). Swansea: University of Wales; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Whall AL. The family as the unit of care in nursing: a historical review. Public Health Nurs 1986;3:240–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadala ML, Adorno Rde C. Phenomenology as a method to investigate the experience lived: a perspective from Husserl and Merleau Ponty’s thought. J Adv Nurs 2002;37:282–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, Britten N, Pill R, Morgan M, Donovan J. Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med 2003;56:671–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards C, Titchen A. Research into patients’ perspectives: relevance and usefulness of phenomenological sociology. J Adv Nurs 2003;44:450–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas SP, Pollio HR. Listening to patients: A Phenomenological Approach to Nursing Research and Practice. New York: Springer; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson A, Wiechula R, Court A, Lockwood C. The JBI model of evidence-based healthcare. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2005;3:207–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyrick J. What is good qualitative research? Jnl Health Psychol 2006;11:799–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Manen M. Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. 2nd ed. London, Ontario: Althouse Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Research governance framework for health and social care. 2nd ed. London: Department of Health; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Brashler R. Ethics, family caregivers, and stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2006;13:11–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop D, Evans R. Families and Stroke: the clinical implications of research findings. Top Stroke Rehabil 1995;2:20–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheung J, Hocking P. Caring as worrying: the experience of spousal carers. J Adv Nurs 2004;47:475–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks P, Pearson C. Improving services for younger stroke survivors and their families. Final report to Chest, Heart and Stroke Scotland. Glasgow: Strathclyde Centre for Disability Research, University of Glasgow; 2003. Available at http://www.chss.org.uk/pdf/research/Young_stroke_study_2003.pdf. Accessed 22 December, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Gillham S, Clark L. Psychological care after stroke: Improving stroke services for people with cognitive and mood disorders. Leicester: NHS Improvement – Stroke; 2011. Available at http://www.improvement.nhs.uk/stroke/. Accessed 22 December, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Sacco RL, Adams R, Albers G, Alberts MJ, Benavente O, Furie K, Goldstein LB, et al.; American Heart Association; American Stroke Association Council on Stroke; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; American Academy of Neurology. Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: co-sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline. Stroke 2006;37:577–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Guideline 108: Management of patients with Stroke or TIA: Assessment, investigation, immediate management and secondary prevention. Edinburgh: SIGN;2008.
   Google Scholar
• Chipchase SY, Lincoln NB. Factors associated with carer strain in carers of people with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 2001;23:76–776
   Google Scholar
• Thompson H, Ryan A. A review of the psychosocial consequences of stroke and their impact on spousal relationships. Br Jnl Neurosci Nurs 2008;4:177–184.
   Google Scholar
• Duhamel F, Talbot L. A constructivist evaluation of family systems nursing interventions with families experiencing cardiovascular and cerebrovascular illness. Jnl Fam Nurs 2004;10:12–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kersten P, Low JT, Ashburn A, George SL, McLellan DL. The unmet needs of young people who have had a stroke: results of a national UK survey. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:860–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed MC, Wood V, Harrington R, Paterson J. Developing stroke rehabilitation and community services: a meta-synthesis of qualitative literature. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:553–563. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2011.613511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low JT, Kersten P, Ashburn A, George S, McLellan DL, Kersen P. A study to evaluate the met and unmet needs of members belonging to Young Stroke groups affiliated with the Stroke Association. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:1052–1056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie D, Joice S, Lawrence M, Whittick J. Interventions for post-stroke disturbances of mood and emotional behaviour: a review of SIGN 118 stroke rehabilitation guideline recommendations. Int Jnl Therapy & Rehabil 2011;18:545–553.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. 2001 Census. . Available at http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/census/census-2001/index.html. Accessed 4 January, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation (WHO). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO; 2001. Available at http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/wha-en.pdf. Accessed 13 December, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Röding J, Lindström B, Malm J, Ohman A. Frustrated and invisible–younger stroke patients’ experiences of the rehabilitation process. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:867–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedeltchev K, der Maur TA, Georgiadis D, Arnold M, Caso V, Mattle HP, Schroth G, et al. Ischaemic stroke in young adults: predictors of outcome and recurrence. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 2005;76:191–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar