Leaving a spinal unit and returning to the wider community: an interpretative phenomenological analysis

References

• O’Conner PJ. Survival after spinal cord injury in Australia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:37–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVivo MJ, Krause JS, Lammertse DP. Recent trends in mortality and causes of death among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:1411–1419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel HL, Coll JR, Charlifue SW, Whiteneck GG, Gardner BP, Jamous MA, Krishnan KR, et al. Long-term survival in spinal cord injury: a fifty year investigation. Spinal Cord 1998;36:266–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyndaele M, Wyndaele JJ. Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: what learns a worldwide literature survey? Spinal Cord 2006;44:523–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlifue S, Gerhart K. Community integration in spinal cord injury of long duration. NeuroRehabilitation 2004;19:91–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forcheimer M, Tate DG. Enhancing community re-integration following spinal cord injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 2004;19:103–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall KM, et al. The Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART): metric properties and scoring. Topics Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil 1998;4(1):16–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy P, Lude P, Taylor N. Quality of life, social participation, appraisals and coping post spinal cord injury: a review of four community samples. Spinal Cord 2006;44:95–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinley WO, Meade MA. Community integration following SCI. NeuroRehabilitation 2004;19:79–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers M. Community integration: conceptual issues and measurement approaches in rehabilitation research. Topics Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil 1998;4(1):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• DeJong G. Independent living: from social movement to analytic paradigm. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979;60:435–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasuda S, Wehman P, Targett P, Cifu DX, West M. Return to work after spinal cord injury: a review of recent research. NeuroRehabilitation 2002;17:177–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater D, Meade MA. Participation in recreation and sports for persons with spinal cord injury: review and recommendations. NeuroRehabilitation 2004;19:121–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasiemski T, Bergström E, Savic G, Gardner BP. Sports, recreation and employment following spinal cord injury–a pilot study. Spinal Cord 2000;38:173–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocarro J, Stable J. Finding the right P.A.T.H: exploring the familial relationships and the role of a community TR program in the initial years after a spinal cord injury. Ther Recreation J 2003;37(1):58–72.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson G, Skär L, Lexell J. Women’s perception of changes in the social network after a spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:1013–1021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Tate D, Charlifue S. Predicting Community Reintegration After Spinal Cord Injury From Demographic and Injury Characteristics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:1485–1491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song HY. Modeling social reintegration in persons with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:131–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschen KA, Tonack M, Gargaro J. Long-term adjustment and community reintegration following spinal cord injury. Int J Rehabil Res 2003;26:157–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter C. The experience of spinal cord injury: the individual’s perspective–implications for rehabilitation practice. Phys Ther 1994;74:614–628; discussion 628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter C, Forman B. Provision of community programs for clients with spinal cord injury: use of qualitative research to evaluate the role of the British Columbia Paraplegic Association. Topics Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil 2004;9(4):57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Meade MA, Dijkers M, Tate DG, Bushnik T, Forchheimer MB. Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1793–1803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JA, Flowers P, Larkin M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. London: Sage; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Smith JA, Jarman M, Osborn M. Doing Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Murray M, Chamberlain K, editors. Qualitative health psychology: theories and methods. London: Sage; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Smith JA. Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: using interpretive phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychol Health 1996;11:261–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biering-Sørensen F, Scheuringer M, Baumberger M, Charlifue SW, Post MW, Montero F, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. Developing core sets for persons with spinal cord injuries based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a way to specify functioning. Spinal Cord 2006;44:541–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon GS, Danesh JN, Caradoc-Davies TH. Epidemiology of spinal cord injury in New Zealand. Neuroepidemiology 1993;12:88–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acland RH. Incidence and prevention of SCI in New Zealand. Iceland: ISCOS; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Smith JA. Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In: Smith JA, Hare R, Van Langerhove L, editors. Rethinking methods in psychology. London: Sage Publication; 1995. pp 9–26.
   Google Scholar
• Smith JA, Osborn M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Breakwell G, editor. Doing social psychology research. Oxford: Blackwell; 2004. pp 229–254.
   Google Scholar
• Dean SG, Smith JA, Payne S. Low back pain: exploring the meaning of exercise management through interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). In: Finlay L, Ballinger C, editors. Qualitative research for allied health professionals: challenging choices. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2006. pp 139–155.
   Google Scholar
• Smith JA, Osborn M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Smith JA, editor. Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2003. pp 51–80.
   Google Scholar
• Smith JA, Dunworth F. Qualitative methods in the study of development. In: Connolly K, Valsiner J, editors. The handbook of developmental psychology. London: Sage; 2003. pp 603–621.
   Google Scholar
• Mays N, Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ 1995;311:109–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Outcomes following traumatic spinal cord injury: Clinical practice guidelines for health-care professionals. Washington (DC): Paralyzed Veterans of America; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Sand A, Karlberg I, Kreuter M. Spinal cord injured persons’ conceptions of hospital care, rehabilitation, and a new life situation. Scand J Occup Ther 2006;13:183–192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanson S, et al. The relationship between coping and adjustment after spinal cord injury: a 5-year follow-up study. Rehabil Psychol 1993;38(1):41–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cott CA. Client-centred rehabilitation: client perspectives. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:1411–1422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls J, Collins F, Sinnott KA. Development, implementation and outcomes of an onsite transitional rehabilitation programme at the Burwood Spinal Unit. In: Australian and New Zealand Spinal Cord Society annual scientific meeting. 2010. Adelaide Convention Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Lohone V, Severinsson E. Hope and despair the awakening of hope following acute spinal injury - an interpretative study. Int J Nurs Stud 2004;41:881–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith B, Sparkes AC. Men, sport, spinal cord injury, and narratives of hope. Soc Sci Med 2005;61:1095–1105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles R, Cott C, Gibson BE. Hope, expectations and recovery from illness: a narrative synthesis of qualitative research. J Adv Nurs 2008;64:564–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortte KB, Gilbert M, Gorman P, Wegener ST. Positive psychological variables in the prediction of life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol 2010;55:40–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott TR, Richards JS. Living with the facts, negotiating the terms: Unrealistic beliefs, denial, and adjustment in the first year of acquired physical disability. J Pers Interpers Loss 1999;4:361–381.
   Google Scholar
• Morse JM, O’Brien B. Preserving self: from victim, to patient, to disabled person. J Adv Nurs 1995;21:886–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou C, Stone DA. Addressing existential disruption in traumatic spinal cord injury: a new approach to human temporality in inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:2121–2133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durie M. Mauri Ora: The dynamics of Maori health. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke AM. In: First National Conference of the Spinal Network. Christchurch, New Zealand: 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Experiences of rehabilitation following spinal cord injury: a meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord 2007;45:260–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inman C. Effectiveness of spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1999;13 Suppl 1:25–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar