The experience of amputation and prosthesis use for adults: a metasynthesis

References

• Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. Psychological adjustment and coping in adults with prosthetic limbs. Behav Med 1999;25:117–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgan O, MacLachlan M. Psychosocial adjustment to lower-limb amputation: a review. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:837–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson C. Phantom limb pain; prevalence, mechanisms and associated factors. In: Murray C, editor. Amputation, prosthesis use, and phantom limb pain. New York: Springer; 2010. pp 137–156.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher K, Hanspal R. Body image and patients with amputations: does the prosthesis maintain the balance? Int J Rehabil Res 1998;21:355–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rybarczyk BD, Nyenhuis DL, Nicholas JJ, Schulz R, Alioto RJ, Blair C. Social discomfort and depression in a sample of adults with leg amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:1169–1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson GM. Restriction of normal activities among older amputees. J Clin Geropsychol 1995:1;229–242.
   Google Scholar
• Burger H, Marincek C. Return to work after lower limb amputation. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1323–1329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fulop N, Tyrer P. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ 2002;325:1263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quon DL, Dudek NL, Marks M, Boutet M, Varpio L. A qualitative study of factors influencing the decision to have an elective amputation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:2087–2092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffalitzky E, Gallagher P, Maclachlan M, Ryall N. Understanding the benefits of prosthetic prescription: exploring the experiences of practitioners and lower limb prosthetic users. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:1314–1323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudgeon BJ, Tyler EJ, Rhodes LA, Jensen MP. Managing usual and unexpected pain with physical disability: a qualitative analysis. Am J Occup Ther 2006;60:92–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CD. ‘Don’t you talk to your prosthetist?’ Communicational problems in the prescription of artificial limbs. Disabil Rehabil (In Press).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M, Booth A, Sutton AJ. Synthesizing qualitative research: a review of published reports. Qual Res 2007:7;375–422.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber R, Crooks D, Stern P. Qualitative meta-analysis. In: Morse J, editor. Completing aqualitative project: Details and dialogue. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1997. pp 311–326.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen LA, Allen MN. Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Qual Health Res 1996:6;553–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noblit G, Hare R. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, Donovan J, Morgan M, Pill R. Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002;7:209–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gallagher P, Maclachlan M. Adjustment to an artificial limb: a qualitative perspective. J Health Psychol 2001;6:85–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CD. An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the embodiment of artificial limbs. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:963–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed D. Understanding and meeting the needs of farmers with amputations. Orthop Nurs 2004;23:397–402, 404.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sjödahl C, Gard G, Jarnlo GB. Coping after trans-femoral amputation due to trauma or tumour–a phenomenological approach. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:851–861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CD. The social meanings of prosthesis use. J Health Psychol 2005:10;425–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oaksford K, Cuddihy R, Frude, N. Positive coping and stress-related psychological growth following lower limb amputation. Rehabil Psychol 2005:50;266–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira Chini GC, Boemer MR. Amputation in the perception of those who experience it: a study under the phenomenological. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2007;15:330–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saradjian A, Thompson AR, Datta D. The experience of men using an upper limb prosthesis following amputation: positive coping and minimizing feeling different. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:871–883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CD. Being like everybody else: the personal meanings of being a prosthesis user. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:573–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa AI, Corredeira R, Pereira AL. The body in persons with an amputation. Adapt Phys Activ Q 2009;26:236–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamill R, Carson S, Dorahy M. Experiences of psychosocial adjustment within 18 months of amputation: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:729–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu F, Williams RM, Liu HE, Chien NH. The lived experience of persons with lower extremity amputation. J Clin Nurs 2010;19:2152–2161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone W, Mortel TF, Taylor B. A path of perpetual resilience: exploring the experience of a diabetes-related amputation through grounded theory. Contemp Nurse 2011;39:20–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg M, Hagberg K, Bullington J. My prosthesis as a part of me: a qualitative analysis of living with an osseointegrated prosthetic limb. Prosthet Orthot Int 2011;35:207–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senra H, Oliveira RA, Leal I, Vieira C. Beyond the body image: a qualitative study on how adults experience lower limb amputation. Clin Rehabil 2012;26:180–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994. pp 105–117.
   Google Scholar
• Public Health Resource Unit. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP): Making sense of evidence. England: Public Health Resource Unit; 2006. Available at: http://www.casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CASP_Qualitative_Appraisal_Checklist_14oct10.pdf Accessed 14 August 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Duggleby W, Holtslander L, Kylma J, Duncan V, Hammond C, Williams A. Metasynthesis of the hope experience of family caregivers of persons with chronic illness. Qual Health Res 2010;20:148–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qual Health Res 2003;13:905–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ross ER. After amputation. Rehabilitation of the diabetic amputee. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1997;87:332–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar