Decreased disability is associated with improved perceived quality of life following spinal fusion

References

• Deyo RA, Nachemson A, Mirza SK. Spinal-fusion surgery - the case for restraint. N Engl J Med 2004;350:722–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Mirza S, Martin BI. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:1441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen T, Videbaek TS, Hansen ES, Bünger C, Christensen FB. The positive effect of posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion is preserved at long-term follow-up: a RCT with 11-13 year follow-up. Eur Spine J 2008;17:272–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haefeli M, Elfering A, McIntosh E, Gray A, Sukthankar A, Boos N. A cost-benefit analysis using contingent valuation techniques: a feasibility study in spinal surgery. Value Health 2008;11:575–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A; Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 2001;26:2521–32; discussion 2532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. Spine J 2008;8:968–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glassman SD, Carreon LY, Djurasovic M, Dimar JR, Johnson JR, Puno RM, Campbell MJ. Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication. Spine J 2009;9:13–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glassman SD, Polly DW, Bono CM, Burkus K, Dimar JR. Outcome of lumbar arthrodesis in patients sixty-five years of age or older. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:783–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimar JR, Glassman SD, Burkus JK, Pryor PW, Hardacker JW, Carreon LY. Two-year fusion and clinical outcomes in 224 patients treated with a single-level instrumented posterolateral fusion with iliac crest bone graft. Spine J 2009;9:880–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker P, Bretschneider W, Tuschel A, Ogon M. Life quality after instrumented lumbar fusion in the elderly. Spine 2010;35:1478–1481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carragee EJ, Cheng I. Minimum acceptable outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion. Spine J 2010;10:313–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djurasovic M, Glassman SD, Howard JM, Copay AG, Carreon LY. Health-related quality of life improvements in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion as a revision surgery. Spine 2011;36:269–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glassman S, Gornet MF, Branch C, Polly D, Peloza J, Schwender JD, Carreon L. MOS short form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience. Spine J 2006;6:21–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980;66:271–273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2000;25:2940–52; discussion 2952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Health Econ 1993;2:217–227.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 1983;17:45–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Sigl T. Assessment of the impact of disease on the individual. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2003;17:451–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cerniauskaite M, Quintas R, Boldt C, Raggi A, Cieza A, Bickenbach JE, Leonardi M. Systematic literature review on ICF from 2001 to 2009: its use, implementation and operationalisation. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:281–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigl T, Cieza A, Brockow T, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. Content comparison of low back pain-specific measures based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Clin J Pain 2006;22:147–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häkkinen A, Kautiainen H, Järvenpää S, Arkela-Kautiainen M, Ylinen J. Changes in the total Oswestry Index and its ten items in females and males pre- and post-surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a 1-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 2007;16:347–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S, Ustün TB, Stucki G. Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med 2002;34:205–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustün B, Stucki G. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:212–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røe C, Sveen U, Bautz-Holter E. Retaining the patient perspective in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for low back pain. Patient Prefer Adherence 2008;2:337–347.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pekkanen L, Kautiainen H, Ylinen J, Salo P, Häkkinen A. Reliability and validity study of the Finnish version 2.0 of the oswestry disability index. Spine 2011;36:332–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osthus H, Cziske R, Jacobi E. Cross-cultural adaptation of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index and evaluation of its measurement properties. Spine 2006;31:E448–E453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 1998;23:2003–2013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garratt A, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ 2002;324:1417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behaviral sciences. rev ed. New York: Academc Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Blood E, Hanscom B, Herkowitz H, et al.; SPORT Investigators. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008;358:794–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Djurasovic M, Dimar JR, Johnson JR, Puno RM, Campbell MJ. Are preoperative health-related quality of life scores predictive of clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion? Spine 2009;34:725–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng ZZ, Cao YW, Jiang C, Jiang XX. Short-term outcome of bilateral decompression via a unilateral paramedian approach for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation. Orthopedics 2011;34:364,20110317-05.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Vela J, Lobo-Escolar A, Joven-Aliaga E, Herrera A, Vicente J, Suñén E, Loste A, Tabuenca A. Perioperative and short-term advantages of mini-open approach for lumbar spinal fusion. Eur Spine J 2009;18:1194–1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saban KL, Penckofer SM, Androwich I, Bryant FB. Health-related quality of life of patients following selected types of lumbar spinal surgery: a pilot study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007;5:71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen FB, Laurberg I, Bünger CE. Importance of the back-café concept to rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: a randomized clinical study with a 2-year follow-up. Spine 2003;28:2561–2569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar