Documenting outdoor activity and travel behaviour in persons with neurological conditions using travel diaries and GPS tracking technology: a pilot study in multiple sclerosis

References

• Turpin KVL, Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Hader WJ. Deterioration in the health-related quality of life of persons with multiple sclerosis: the possible warning signs. Mult Scler 2007;13:1038–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaney C, Blaurock H, Gattlen B, Meisels C. Assessing mobility in multiple sclerosis using the Rivermead Mobility Index and gait speed. Clin Rehabil 1996;10:216–26
   Google Scholar
• Schultheis MT, Garay E, DeLuca J. The influence of cognitive impairment on driving performance in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2001;56:1089–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einarsson U, Gottberg K, Frederikson S, von Koch L. Activities of daily living and social activities in people with multiple sclerosis in Stockholm County. Clin Rehabil 2006;20:543–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lexell EM, Iwarsson S, Lexell J. The complexity of daily occupations in multiple sclerosis. Scand J Occup Ther 2006;13:241–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finlayson M, Impey WM, Nicolle C, Edwards J. Self-care, productivity and leisure limitations of people with multiple sclerosis in Manitoba. Can J Occup Ther 1998;65:299–308
   Google Scholar
• Hakim EA, Bakheit AM, Bryant TN, et al. The social impact of multiple sclerosis – a study of 305 patients and their relatives. Disabil Rehabil 2000;22:288–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan F, Pallant JF. Use of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to describe patient-reported disability in multiple sclerosis and identification of relevant environmental factors. J Rehabil Med 2007;39:63–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roessler RT, Rumrill PD, Fitzgerald SM. Predictors of employment status for people with multiple sclerosis. Rehabil Counsel Bull 2004;47:96–103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips LJ, Stuifbergen AK. Predicting continued employment in persons with multiple sclerosis. J Rehabil 2006;72:35–43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paltamaa J, Sarasoja T, Wikström J, Mälkiä E. Physical functioning in multiple sclerosis: a population-based study in central Finland. J Rehabil Med 2006;38:339–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson M, Denend TV. Experiencing the loss of mobility: perspectives of older adults with MS. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:1168–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meert H. Maken we vooruitgang in het bestrijden van vervoersarmoede in Vlaanderen? Vlaamse Overheid, Brussels: Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeemschap; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Motl RW, McAuley E, Snook EM. Physical activity and multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis. Mult Scler 2005;11:459–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gijbels D, Alders G, van Hoof E, et al. Predicting habitual walking performance in multiple sclerosis: relevance of capacity and self-report measures. Mult Scler 2010;16:618–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace RB, Franc D. Literature review of the status of research on the transportation and mobility needs of older women. Washington, DC: United States Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 1999
   Google Scholar
• Shephard RJ. Review. Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires. Br J Sports Med 2003;37:197–206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel ME, et al. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ 2008;5:56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosney JL, Scott JA, Snook EM, Motl RW. Physical activity and multiple sclerosis: validity of self-report and objective measures. Fam Community Health 2007;30:144–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale L, Williams K, Ashton C, et al. Reliability of RT3 accelerometer for measuring mobility in people with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev 2007;44:619–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SJ, Young CA. The role of affect on the perception of disability in multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil 2000;14:50–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoval N, Auslander GK, Freytag T, et al. The use of advanced tracking technologies for the analysis of mobility in Alzheimer’s disease and related cognitive diseases. BMC Geriatr 2008;8:7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wendel K, Stahl A, Risberg J, et al. Post-stroke functional limitations and changes in use of mode in transport. Scand J Occup Ther 2010;17:162–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risser R, Iwarsson S, Stahl A. How do people with cognitive functional limitations post-stroke manage the use of buses in local public transport? Transport Res F 2012;15:111–18
   Google Scholar
• Logan PA, Dyas J. Using an interview study of transport use by people who have had a stroke to inform rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:703–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001;50:121–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki – ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Ferney-Voltaire, France: World Medical Association; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Hauser SL, Dawson DM, Lehrich JR, et al. Intensive immunosuppression in progressive multiple sclerosis. A randomized, three-arm study of high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide, plasma exchange, and ACTH. N Engl J Med 1983;308:173–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Multiple sclerosis functional composite – administration and scoring manual. New York: National Multiple Sclerosis Society; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Duff K, Humphreys Clark JD, O’Bryant SE, et al. Utility of the RBANS in detecting cognitive impairment associated with Alzheimer’s disease: sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive powers. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2008;23:603–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kos D, Nagels G, D’Hooghe MB, et al. A rapid screening tool for fatigue impact in multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol 2006;6:27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bambauer KZ, Locke SE, Aupont O, et al. Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale to screen for depression in cardiac patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2005;27:275–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellemans T, Kochan B, Janssens D, et al. In the field evaluation of personal digital assistant enabled by global positioning system: impact on quality of activity and diary data. Proceedings of the 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (TRB); 2008 Jan 13–17; Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• Duncan MJ, Badland HM, Mummery WK. Review. Applying GPS to enhance understanding of transport-related physical activity. J Sci Med Sport 2009;12:549–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoval N, Auslander G, Cohen-Shalom K, et al. What can we learn about the mobility of the elderly in the GPS era? J Transport Geogr 2010;18:603–12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssens AC, van Doorn PA, de Boer JP, et al. Impact of recently diagnosed multiple sclerosis on quality of life, anxiety, depression and distress of patients and partners. Acta Neurol Scand 2003;108:389–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devos H, Brijs T, Alders G, et al. Driving performance in persons with mild to moderate multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil (forthcoming article)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobelt G, Berg J, Lindgren P, et al. Costs and quality of life for patients with multiple sclerosis in Belgium. Eur J Health Econ 2006;7:S24–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar