Patterns of participation in school-related activities and settings in children with spina bifida

References

• King G, Tucker MA, Baldwin P, et al. A life needs model of pediatric service delivery: services to support community participation and quality of life for children and youth with disabilities. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2002;22:53–77
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Jonsson H. An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the international classification of functioning, disability and health – some critical remarks. Am J Occup Ther 2005;59:569–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coster W, Khetani MA. Measuring participation of children with disabilities: issues and challenges. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:639–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Dijkers MP. Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:S22–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Law M. Participation in the occupations of everyday life. Am J Occup Ther 2002;56:640–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perenboom RJ, Chorus AM. Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:577–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueda S, Okawa Y. The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: what is it and what is it for? Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:596–601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almqvist L, Granlund M. Participation in school environment of children and youth with disabilities: a person-oriented approach. Scand J Psych 2005;46:305–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buran CF, Sawin KJ, Brei TJ, Fastenau PS. Adolescents with myelomeningocele: activities, beliefs, expectations, and perceptions. Dev Med Child Neurol 2004;46:244–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller-Godeffroy E, Michael T, Poster M, et al. Self-reported health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with myelomeningocele. Dev Med Child Neurol 2008;50:456–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Mechelen MC, Verhoef M, van Asbeck FW, Post MW. Work participation among young adults with spina bifida in the Netherlands. Dev Med Child Neurol 2008;50:772–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barf HA, Post MW, Verhoef M, et al. Restrictions in social participation of young adults with spina bifida. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:921–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson I, Dahl M, Mattsson S, et al. Medical problems in adolescents with myelomeningocele (MMC): an inventory of the Swedish MMC population born during 1986–1989. Acta Paediatr 2007;96:446–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juranek J, Salman MS. Anomalous development of brain structure and function in spina bifida myelomeningocele. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2010;16:23–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher JM, Ostermaier KK, Cirino PT, Dennis M. Neurobehavioral outcomes in spina bifida: processes versus outcome. J Pediatr Rehabil Med 2008;1:311–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dennis M, Barnes MA. The cognitive phenotype of spina bifida meningomyelocele. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2010;16:31–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peny-Dahlstrand M, Ahlander AC, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Gosman-Hedstrom G. Quality of performance of everyday activities in children with spina bifida: a population-based study. Acta Paediatr 2009;98:1674–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peny-Dahlstrand M, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Gosman-Hedstrom G. Is autonomy related to the quality of performance of everyday activities in children with spina bifida? Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:514–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egilson ST, Traustadottir R. Participation of students with physical disabilities in the school environment. Am J Occup Ther 2009;63:264–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini MC, Coster WJ. Functional predictors of school participation by children with disabilities. Occup Ther Int 2004;11:12–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Borell L. Environmental barriers in mainstream schools. Child Care Health Dev 2002;28:57–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Borell L, Gustavsson A. Temporal aspects of teaching and learning – implications for pupils with physical disabilities. Scand J Disabil Res 1999;1:26–43
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson L, Welander J, Granlund M. Participation in everyday school activities for children with and without disabilities. J Dev Phys Disabil 2007;19:485–502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini MC, Coster WJ, Trombly CA, Herren TC. Predicting elementary school participation in children with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:339–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Finkelman S, Hurley P, et al. Participation of children with physical disabilities: relationships with diagnosis, physical function, and demographic variables. Scand J Occup Ther 2004;11:156–62
   Google Scholar
• Schenker R, Coster W, Parush S. Participation and activity performance of students with cerebral palsy within the school environment. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:539–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simeonsson RJ, Carlson D, Huntington GS, et al. Students with disabilities: a national survey of participation in school activities. Disabil Rehabil 2001;23:49–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher AG. Assessment of motor and process skills volume 1: development, standardization, and administration manual. 5th ed. Fort Collins (CO): Three Star Press; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson L. The relationship between school environment and participation for students with disabilities. Pediatr Rehabil 2005;8:130–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coster W, Deeney T, Haltiwanger J, Haley S. School Function Assessment SFA: user’s manual. San Antonio: Therapy Skill Builder, The Psychological Corporation; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Hwang J, Davies P, Taylor M, Gavin W. Validation of school function assessment with elementary school children. Occup Ther J Res 2002;22:48–58
   Google Scholar
• Davies P, Soon P, Young M, Clausen-Yamaki A. Validity and reliability of the school function assessment in elementary school students with disabilities. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2004;24:23–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dekker J, Dallmeijer AJ, Lankhorst GJ. Clinimetrics in rehabilitation medicine: current issues in developing and applying measurement instruments. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:193–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White BP, Mulligan SE. Behavioral and physiologic response measures of occupational task performance: a preliminary comparison between typical children and children with attention disorder. Am J Occup Ther 2005;59:426–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zelst B, Miller M, Russo R, et al. Activities of daily living in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a cross-sectional evaluation using the assessment of motor and process skills. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006;48:723–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne S, Howell C. An evaluation of the clinical use of the assessment of motor and process skills with children. Br J Occup Ther 2005;68:277–80
   Google Scholar
• Kottorp A, Bernspang B, Fisher AG. Validity of a performance assessment of activities of daily living for people with developmental disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res 2003;47:597–605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayase D, Mosenteen D, Thimmaiah D, et al. Age-related changes in activities of daily living ability. Aust Occup Ther J 2004;51:192–8
   Google Scholar
• AMPS Project International. AMPS Software 2005. Available from: http://www.ampsintl.com/AMPS/software/about.php [last accessed 10 Apr 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Peny-Dahlstrand M, Gosman-Hedstrom G, Krumlinde-Sundholm L. Are there cross-cultural differences of ADL ability in children measured with the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS)? Scand J Occup Ther 2012;19:26–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. 1st ed. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman & Hall/CRC; 1991
   Google Scholar
• Fisher A, Jones K. Assessment of motor and process skills: volume 1-development, standardization and administration manual. 7th ed. Fort Collins (CO): Three Star Press; 2010
   Google Scholar
• SPSS I. IBM SPSS Statistics 17. SPSS Chicago, IL, 60606 2010. Available from: http://www-01.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/ [last accessed 10 Jun 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Asbjornslett M, Hemmingsson H. Participation at school as experienced by teenagers with physical disabilities. Scand J Occup Ther 2008;15:153–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van’T Leven N, Jonsson H. Doing and being in the atmosphere of the doing: environmental influences on occupational performance in a nursing home. Scand J Occup Ther 2002;9:148–55
   Google Scholar
• Pereira E, la Cour K, Jonsson H, Hemmingsson H. The participation experience of children with disabilities in Portuguese mainstream schools. Br J Occup Ther 2010;73:598–606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields N, Taylor NF, Dodd KJ. Self-concept in children with spina bifida compared with typically developing children. Dev Med Child Neurol 2008;50:733–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine KA, Holmbeck GN, Gayes L, Purnell JQ. Friendships of children and adolescents with spina bifida: social adjustment, social performance, and social skills. J Pediatr Psychol 2012;37:220–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essner BS, Holmbeck GN. The impact of family, peer, and school contexts on depressive symptoms in adolescents with spina bifida. Rehabil Psychol 2010;55:340–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vu Minh Arnell M, Seljee Svedberg K, Lindehall B, et al. Adults with myelomeningocele: An interview study about life situation and bladder and bowel management. J Pediatr Urol 2012 [Epub ahead of print]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilcock AA. Reflections on doing, being and becoming. Aust Occup Ther J 1999;46:1–11
   Google Scholar
• Mandich A, Rodger S. Doing, being and becoming: their importance for children. In: Rodger S, Ziviani J, eds. Occupational therapy with children: understanding children’s occupation and enabling participation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2006:115–32
   Google Scholar
• Vygotzky LS. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1978
   Google Scholar
• Dolva A-S, Hemmingsson H, Gustavsson A, Borell L. Children with Down syndrome in mainstream schools: peer interaction in activities. Eur J Spec Needs Educ 2010;25:283–94
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Petrenchik T, King G, Hurley P. Perceived environmental barriers to recreational, community, and school participation for children and youth with physical disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:1636–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coster WJ, Haltiwanger JT. Social-behavioral skills of elementary students with physical disabilities included in general education classrooms. Remed Spec Educ 2004;25:95–103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis J, Polatajako H. Occupational Development. In: Christiansson C, Townsend E, eds. Introduction to occupation: the art and science of living. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Education; 2010:135–74
   Google Scholar