Implementation of coherent, evidence-based pathways in Danish rehabilitation practice

References

• Bahtsevani C, Uden G, Willman A. Outcomes of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2004;20:427–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgs J, Jones MA, eds. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. 3rd ed. Abingdon: Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Menon A, Korner-Bitensky N, Kastner M, et al. Strategies for Rehabilitation Professionals to mow evidence-based knowledge into practice: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:1024–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:iii–iv, 1–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Thomas R, et al. Toward evidence-based quality improvement evidence (and its limitations) of the effectiveness of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies 1966–1998. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:SI4–20
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell E, Whitehead M, Fleming J, Moes L. Evidence-based practice in everyday clinical practice: strategies for change in a tertiary occupational therapy department. Aust Occup Ther J 2008;55:79–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borch M, Tavender E, Bragge P, et al. How to define ‘best practice’ for use in Knowledge Translation research: a practical, stepped and interactive process. J Eval Clin Pract ISSN 2012: Apr 9. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Curran JA, Grimshaw JM, Hayden JA, Campbell B. Knowledge translation reseach: the science of moving research into policy and practice. Educ Health Prof 2001;31:174–80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott SD, Albrecht L, O’Leary K, et al. A protocol for a systematic review of knowledge translation strategies in the allied health professions. Implement Sci 2011;6:58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estabrooks CA, Thompson DS, Lovely JJE, Hofmeyer A. A guide to knowledge translation theory. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006;26:25–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rycroft-Malone J, Bucknall T, eds. Models and frameworks for implementing evidence-based practice. Linking evidence to action. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B. Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. Qual Health Care 1998;7:149–58
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cusick A, McCluskey A. Becoming an evidence-based practitioner through professional development. Aust Occup Ther J 2000;47:159–70
   Google Scholar
• Prior M, Guerin M, Grimmer-Somers K. The effectiveness of clinical guideline implementation strategies – a synthesis of systematic review findings. J Eval Clin Pract 2008;14:888–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willman A, Stoltz P, Bathsevani C. Evidensbaseret sygepleje. [Evidence-based nursing]. 2nd ed. Copenhagen: Gyldendal; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Hakkennes S, Dodd K. Guideline implementation in allied health professions: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:296–300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent B, McCormack B. Clinical context for evidence-based nursing practice. Chichester, England: Wiley Blackwell; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Harvey G, Loftus-Hills A, Rycroft-Malone J, et al. Getting evidence into practice: the role and function of facilitation. J Adv Nurs 2002;37:577–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popay J, Williams G. Qualitative research and evidence-based healthcare. J R Soc Med 1998;91:32–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. London: Sage; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Öhman A. Qualitative methodology for rehabilitation research. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:273–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornquist E. Videnskabsfilosofi og videnskabsteori for sundhedsfagene. Copenhagen: Gads Forlag; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson S. Focus group research. In: Silverman D, ed. Qualitative research. Theory, method and practice. London: Sage; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Halkier B. Focus groups. Samfundslitteratur. Roskilde Universitetsforlag; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Ivanoff SD, Hultberg J. Understanding the multiple realities of everyday life: basic assumptions in focus-group methodology. Scand J Occup Ther 2006;13:125–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricoeur P. Interpretation theory: discourse and the surplus of meaning. FortWorth (TX): Texas Christian University Press; 1976
   Google Scholar
• Dreyer PS, Pedersen BD. Distanciation in Ricoeur’s theory of interpretation: narrations in a study of life experiences of living with chronic illness and home mechanical ventilation. Nurs Inq 2009;16:64–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindseth A, Norberg A. A phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience. Scand J Caring Sci 2004;18:145–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson PJ. How to undertake a systematic review in an occupational setting. Occup Environ Med 2007;64:353–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston MV. Desiderata for clinical trials in medical rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:S3–S7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Buzzetti R, Grilli R, et al. Which guidelines can we trust? West J Med 2001;174:262–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, et al. Evidence-based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2000
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen HK, Nygren C, Matzen P, et al. Evaluation of evidence in Occupational Therapy for stroke patients. Scand J Occup Ther 2011;1:11–25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1985
   Google Scholar
• Cho J, Trent A. Validity in qualitative research revisited. Qual Res 2006;6:319–40
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 2001;358:483--8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar