Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) monitoring and evaluation methods and tools: a literature review

References

• World Health Organization (WHO), World Bank: World Report on Disability. Geneva: WHO; 2011
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO), UNESCO, International Labour Organisation (ILO), International Disability Development Consortium. Community-Based Rehabilitation (CBR) Guidelines. Geneva: WHO; 2010
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO), International Labour Office (ILO), UNESCO. CBR. A strategy for rehabilitation, equalization of opportunities, poverty reduction and social inclusion of people with disabilities. Geneva, Switzerland; 2004
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. Resolution 55/2: United Nations Millennium Declaration. United Nations; 2000
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. 2006. Available from: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/disabilities-convention.htm [last accessed 16 May 2009]
   Google Scholar
• Finkenflugel H, Wolffers I, Huijsman R. The evidence base for community-based rehabilitation: a literature review. Int J Rehabil Res 2005;28:187–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley S, Finkenflugel H, Kuipers P, Thomas M. Community based rehabilitation: opportunity and challenge. Lancet 2009;374:1803--4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turmusani M, Vreede A, Wirz SL. Some ethical issues in community-based rehabilitation initiatives in developing countries. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:558–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassah A. Community-based rehabilitation and stigma management by physically disabled in Ghana. Disabil Rehabil 1998;20:66–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkenflugel H, Cornielje H, Velema J. The use of classification models in the evaluation of CBR programmes. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:348–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velema J, Ebenso B, Fuzikawa, L. Evidence for the effectiveness of rehabilitation-in-the-community programmes. Lepr Rev 2008;79:65–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell R. The research base of community-based rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 1999;21:459–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Evaluation Office. Handbook on monitoring and evaluating for results. New York: United Nations; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Fretheim A, Oxman A, Lavis J, Lewin S. SUPPORT Tools for Evidence-informed Policymaking in health 18: planning monitoring and evaluation policies. Health Res Policy Syst 2009;7:S18 . doi:10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weyrauch V, D'Agostino J, Richards C. Learners, practitioners, and teachers: handbook on monitoring, evaluating and managing knowledge for policy influence. Buenos-Aires, Fundacion CIPPEC; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 2000;321:694–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepperd S, Lewin S, Straus S, et al. Can we systematically review studies that evaluate complex interventions? PLoS Med Debate 2009;6:e1000086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig P, Dieppe P, MacIntyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:a1655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petticrew M. When are complex interventions ‘complex’? When are simple interventions ‘simple’? Eur J Public Health 2011;21:397–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuipers P, Kuipers K, Mongkolsrisawat S, et al. Categorising CBR service delivery: the ROI-ET classification. Asia Pac Disabil Rehabil J 2003;14:128–46
   Google Scholar
• Velema JP, Cornielje H. Reflect before you act: providing structure to the evaluation of rehabilitation programmes. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:1252–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornielje H, Nicholls P, Velema J. Avoiding misperceptions: classifying rehabilitation projects using letters rather than numbers. Lepr Rev 2002;73:47–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornielje H, Nicholls P, Velema J. Making sense of rehabilitation projects: classification by objectives. Lepr Rev 2000;71:472–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas MJ, Thomas M, Babu R, Velema J. Classification by objectives: a rejoinder. Lepr Rev 2003;74:175–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannan H, Turnbull A. A review of community based rehabilitation evaluations: quality of life as an outcome measure for future evaluations. Asia Pac Disabil Rehabil J 2007;18:29–45
   Google Scholar
• Sharma M. Viable methods for evaluation of community-based rehabilitation programmes. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:326–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra A, Rangasayee R. Development of ICF based measuring tool for inclusive education set ups. Asia Pac Disabil Rehabil J 2010;21:57–69
   Google Scholar
• Wirz S. Evaluation of community-based rehabilitation programmes: a search for appropriate indicators. Int J Rehabil Res 2002;25:163–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornielje H, Velema J, Finkenflugel H. Community based rehabilitation programmes: monitoring and evaluation in order to measure results. Lepr Rev 2008;79:36–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung EY, Packer TL, Yau M. A framework for evaluating community-based rehabilitation programmes in Chinese communities. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:1668–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velema JP, Cornielje H. Backbone principles of the CBR guidelines and their application in the field of leprosy. Asia Pac Disabil Rehabil J 2010;21:26–42
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for conducting, monitoring and self-assessment of community based rehabilitation programmes. In: International Disability Consortium. Disability and rehabilitation. Geneva: WHO; 1996:49 pp
   Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005;8:19–32
   Google Scholar
• Mikki S. Google Scholar compared to Web of Science: a literature review. Nord J Info Lit High Educ 2009;1:41–51
   Google Scholar
• Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB 2008;22:338–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Meho L. Citation analysis: a comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. 69th Annual Meeting of the American Sociaty for Information Science and Technology (ASIST); 2006 3–8 Nov; Austin (US)
   Google Scholar
• Harzing AWK, van der Wal R. Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics Sci Environ Polit 2008;8:61–73
   Google Scholar
• Gardner S, Eng S. Gaga over Google? Scholar in the Social Sciences. Library Hi Tech News 2005;22:42–5
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Gershon W, Srinivasan G. Community-based rehabilitation: an evaluation study. Lepr Rev 1992;63:51–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claussen J, Kandyomunda B, Jareg P. Evaluation of the community based rehabilitation programme in Uganda. Oslo, Stockholm: Norwegian Association of the Disabled; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell R, Zhou D, Lu Y, Watts G. Community-based rehabilitation: does it change community attitudes towards people with disability. Disabil Rehabil 1993;15:179–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bischoff R, Thorburn MJ, Reitmaier P. Neighbourhood support to families with a disabled child: observations on a coping strategy of caregivers in a Jamaican community-based rehabilitation programme. Child Care Health Dev 1996;22:397–410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConachie H, Huq S, Munir S, et al. Difficulties for mothers in using an early intervention service for children with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev 2001;27:1–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Patel V, Chatterjee A, Weiss HA. Evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation model for chronic schizophrenia in rural India. Br J Psychiatry 2003;182:57–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley S. Evaluating the impact of a community-based rehabilitation intervention. Australia: Department of International Development; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Eide AH. Impact of community-based rehabilitation programmes: the case of Palestine. Scand J Disabil Res 2006;8:199–210
   Google Scholar
• Barbato A, Agnetti G, D'Avanzo B, et al. Outcome of community-based rehabilitation program for people with mental illness who are considered difficult to treat. J Rehabil Res Dev 2007;44:775--84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Pillai A, Jain S, et al. Outcomes of people with psychotic disorders in a community-based rehabilitation programme in rural India. Br J Psychiatry 2009;195:433–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren-Lindquist B, Nordholm L. The impact of a community-based rehabilitation as perceived by disabled people in a village in Botswana. Disabil Rehabil 1996;18:329–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill L, McAuley C, Sarchuk C, Shalom L. Community based rehabilitation in Solomon Islands: lessons learned by Canadian rehabilitation professionals. Can J Rehabil 1997;10:285–95
   Google Scholar
• Miles S. Engaging with the disability rights movement: the experience of community-based rehabilitation in southern Africa. Disabil Soc 1996;11:501–18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagerkvist B. Community-based rehabilitation – outcome for the disabled in the Philippines and Zimbabwe. Disabil Rehabil 1992;14:44–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thorburn MJ. Parent evaluation of community based rehabilitation in Jamaica International. J Rehabil Res 1992;15:170–6
   Google Scholar
• Jagannathan S, Ramamurthy V, Yeyaraj S, Regina M. A pilot project on community based rehabilitation in South India – a preliminary report. Indian J Lepr 1993;65:315–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dolan C, Concha M, Nyathi E. Community rehabilitation workers: do they offer hope to disabled people in South Africa’s rural areas? Int J Rehabil Res 1995;18:187–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdez L, Mitchell R. Community-based rehabilitation: a development programme in Negros Occidental. Disabil Rehabil 1999;21:495–500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordholm L, Lundgren-LindQuist B. Community-based rehabilitation in Moshupa village, Botswana. Disabil Rehabil 1999;21:515–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez JM, Lewis JA, Boldy DP. Evaluation of a Philippine community based rehabilitation programme. Asia Pac J Public Health 2000;12:85–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans P, Zinkin P, harpham T, Chaudury G. Evaluation of medical rehabilitation in community based rehabilitation. Soc Sci Med 2001;53:333–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma M, Deepak S. A participatory evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme in North Vietnam. Disabil Rehabil 2001;23:352–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO), Swedish Organizations of Disabled Persons International Aid Association (SHIA). Community-based rehabilitation as we have experienced it: voices of persons with disabilities. Geneva: WHO; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Kuipers P, Kendall E, Hancock T. Evaluation of a rural community-based disability service in Queensland, Australia. Rural Remote Health (on line) 2003;3:186 . Available from: http://www.rrh.org.au/articles/subviewnew.asp?ArticleID=186 [last accessed 23 Feb 2013]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grut L, Hjort P, Eide AH. “More of the same and try something new” Evaluation of the community based rehabilitation programme in Eritrea. Report no STF78 A044515. Oslo, Norway: Sintef; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Krokeide N. Assessment of MLHW income generation activities in Eritrea. Oslo, Stockholm: Norwegian Association of Disabled; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Zaino CA, Pearson C, Li J. Sichuan community based rehabilitation project for children with cerebral palsy: Mid-term evaluation 2006. Oslo, Norway: Den Norske Misjonsallianse (NMA)
   Google Scholar
• Ebenso B, Fashona A, Ayuba M, et al. Impact of socio-economic rehabilitation of leprosy stigma in northern Nigeria; Findings of a retrospective study. Asia Pac Disabil J 2007;18:98–119
   Google Scholar
• Bualar T, Ahmad MM. Why does community-based rehabilitation fail physically disabled women in northern Thailand? Dev Pract 2009;19:28–38
   Google Scholar
• Dhungana BM, Kusakabe K. The role of self-help groups in empowering disabled women: a case study in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Dev Pract 2010;20:855–65
   Google Scholar
• Kim KM. The accomplishments of disabled women’s advocacy organizations and their future in Korea. Disabil Soc 2010;25:219–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebenso B, Idah M, Anyor T, Opakunmi F. Lessons from the evolution of a CBR programme for people affected by leprosy in Northern Nigeria. Lepr Rev 2010;81:318–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaran KP. Role of self-help groups in promoting inclusion and rights of persons with disabilities. Disabil CBR Inclusive Dev 2011;22:105--13
   Google Scholar
• Mijnarends D, Pham D, Swaans K, et al. Sustainability criteria for CBR programmes – two case studies of provincial programmes in Vietnam. Disabil CBR Inclusive Dev 2011;22:3--21
   Google Scholar
• Adeoye A, Seeley J, Hartley S. Developing a tool for evaluating community-based rehabilitation in Uganda. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:1110–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar