The ideal of consumer choice in social services: challenges with implementation in an Ontario injured worker vocational retraining programme

References

• Petersen A, Lupton D. The new public health: health and self in the age of risk. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1996
   Google Scholar
• Greco M. Psychosomatic subjects and the “duty to be well”: personal agency within medical rationality. Econ Soc 1993;22:357–71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon C. Government rationality: an introduction. In: Burchell G, Gordon C, Miller P, eds. The foucault effect: studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1991:1–51
   Google Scholar
• Varul M. Talcott Parsons, the sick role and chronic illness. Body Soc 2010;16:72–94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson A. Shifting discourses in health in Canada: from health promotion to population health. Health Promot Int 1998;13:155–66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald R, Mead N, Cheraghi-Sohi S, et al. Governing the ethical consumer: identity, choice and the primary medical encounter. Sociol Health Illn 2007;29:430–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd C, King R, Bassett H, et al. Patient, client or consumer? A survey of preferred terms. Disabil Rehabil 2001;9:321–4
   Google Scholar
• Cott C. Client-centred rehabilitation: client perspectives. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:1411–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotaki M. Choice is yours: a psychodynamic exploration of health policymaking and its consequences for the English National Health Service. Hum Relations 2006;59:1711–44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karasek R. Control in the workplace and its health-related aspects. In: Sauter SL, Hurrell Jr. JJ, Cooper CL, eds. Job control and worker health. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 1989
   Google Scholar
• Fotaki M. Patient choice and equity in the British National Health Service: towards developing an alternative framework. Sociol Health Illness 2010;32:898–913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickizer TM, Franklin G, Turner J, Fulton-Kehoe D. Use of attorneys and appeal filing in the Washington State workers’ compensation program: does patient satisfaction matter? J Occup Environ Med 2004;46:331–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson SG. Ensuring the stability of welfare-to-work exits: the importance of recipient knowledge about work incentives. Soc Work 2002;47:162–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole D, Mondloch MV, Hogg-Johnson S. Listening to injured workers: how recovery expectations predict outcomes–a prospective study. CMAJ 2002;166:749–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heim M, Friedman I, Tzadok N, et al. Why did the patient choose an inappropriate orthosis? Disabil Rehabil 2000;22:157–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose N. Governing ‘advanced’ liberal democracies. In: Barry A, Osborne T, Rose N, eds. Foucault and political reason: liberalism, neo-liberalism, and rationalities of government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1996:37–64
   Google Scholar
• Sager L, James C. Injured workers’ perspectives of their rehabilitation process under the New South Wales Workers Compensation System. Aust Occup Ther J 2005;52:127–35
   Google Scholar
• MacEachen E, Ferrier S, Kosny A, Chambers L. A deliberation on “hurt versus harm” logic in early return to work policy. Policy Prac Health Saf 2007;5:41–62
   Google Scholar
• Beardwood BA, Kirsh B, Clark NJ. Victims twice over: perceptions and experiences of injured workers. Qual Health Res 2005;15:30–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S, Chambers L. The “toxic dose” of system problems: why some injured workers don’t return to work as expected. J Occup Rehabil 2010;20:349–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean M. Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1999
   Google Scholar
• Burchell G. Peculiar interests: civil society and governing the “system of natural liberty”. In: Burchell G, Gordon C, Miller P, eds. The foucault effect: studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1991:119–50
   Google Scholar
• Deaton A, Muelbauer J. Economics and human behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1980
   Google Scholar
• Nordgren L. Mostly empty words – what the discourse of “choice” in health care does. J Health Organ Manage 2010;24:109–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glasgow SM. What goes up: the genesis and context of health reform in Sweden. Global Health Governance 2009;3:1--18
   Google Scholar
• National Health Service. Common health problems: what are fit notes? NHS Choices: Your Health, Your Choices; 2010. Available from: http://www.nhs.uk/chq/Pages/2584.aspx [last accessed 10 Oct 2010]
   Google Scholar
• Bauman Z. Work, consumerism and the new poor. Philadelphia: Open University Press; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Loisel L, Falardeau M, Baril R, et al. The values underlying team decision-making in work rehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:561–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braathen TN, Veiersted KB, Heggenes J. Improved work ability and return to work following vocational multidisciplinary rehabilitation of subjects on long-term sick leave. J Rehabil Med 2007;39:493–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn EC, Wewiorski NJ, Rogers ES. A qualitative investigation of individual and contextual factors associated with vocational recovery among people with serious mental illness. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2010;80:185–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stergiou-kita M, Yantzi A, Wan J. The personal and workplace factors relevant to work readiness evaluation following acquired brain injury: occupational therapists’ perceptions. Brain Inj 2010;24:948–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browner CH, Preloran HM. Latinas, amniocentesis and the discourse of choice. Cult Med Psychiatry 2000;24:353–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P. Pascalian meditations. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1997
   Google Scholar
• Douglas M. Conclusion: risk is a collective construct. Risk and culture. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1982
   Google Scholar
• MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S, et al. The “ability” paradigm in vocational rehabilitation: challenges in an Ontario injured worker retraining program. J Occup Rehabil 2012;22:115–17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheek J. At the margins? Discourse analysis and qualitative research. Qual Health Res 2004;14:1140–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges BD, Kuper A, Reeves S. Discourse analysis. BMJ 2008;337:570–2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KPMG. WSIB Labour Market Re-entry (LMR) program value for money audit report. Toronto: Workplace Safety & Insurance Board; 2009
   Google Scholar
• WSIB. LMR program update. Toronto: Workplace Safety & Insurance Board; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social scientists and researchers. London: Sage; 2003
   Google Scholar
• WSIB. Labour market re-entry: the next steps for return to work. Toronto: Workplace Safety & Insurance Board; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Lippel K. Workers describe the effect of the workers’ compensation process on their health: a Quebec study. Int J Law Psychiatry 2007;30:427–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts-Yates C. The concerns and issues of injured workers in relation to claims/injury management and rehabilitation: the need for new operational frameworks. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:898–907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjellberg A, Kåhlin I, Haglund L, Taylor RR. The myth of participation in occupational therapy: reconceptualizing a client-centred approach. Scand J Occup Ther 2012;19:421--7
   Google Scholar
• Pransky G, Shaw W, Loisel P, et al. Development and validation of competencies for return to work coordinators. J Occup Rehabil 2010;20:41–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIDMAR. International leadership and expertise benefits NIDMAR Board. Bulletin. [Bulletin/Newsletter] 2008;4:1–4
   Google Scholar
• Jones BD. Bounded rationality. Ann Rev Pol Sci 1999;2:297–321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt MR, Ells C. Partners towards autonomy: risky choices and relational autonomy in rehabilitation care. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:961–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf-Branigin M, Daeschlein M, Cardinal B. Differing priorities of counselors and customers to a consumer choice model in rehabilitation. J Rehabil 2000;66:18–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James C, Southgate E, Kable A, et al. The return-to-work coordinator role: qualitative insights for nursing. J Occup Rehabil 2011;21:220–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl C, Svensson T, Petersson G, Ekberg K. A matter of trust? A study of coordination of Swedish stakeholders in return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil 2010;20:299–310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale LA, Smith C, Mulligan H, Treharne GJ. “Tell me what you want, what you really really want … .”: asking people with multiple sclerosis about enhancing their participation in physical activity. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:1887--93
   Google Scholar
• Fotaki M, Roland M, Boyd A, et al. What benefits will choice bring to patients? Literature review and assessment of implications. J Health Serv Res Policy 2008;13:178–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P. The forms of capital. In: Richardson JG, ed. Handbook for theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood Press; 1986:241–58
   Google Scholar
• Riach K. Managing “difference”: understanding age diversity in practice. Hum Resour Manage J 2009;19:319–35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjellberg A. More or less independent. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:828–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerson DE. Uncovering socially undesirable emotions. Experiences of ambiguity in organisations. Am Behav Sci 1990;33:296–307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte. Value for money audit of the Labour Market Re-entry Program: executive summary of final report. Toronto: Workplace Safety & Insurance Board; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Zoller HM. Health on the line: identity and disciplinary control in employee occupational health and safety discourse. J Appl Commun Res 2003;31:118–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WSIB. WSIB announces changes to Labour Market Re-entry; 2010. Available from: http://www.wsib.on.ca/wsib/wsibsite.nsf/public/NewsWorkReintegration [last accessed 9 Nov 2010]
   Google Scholar
• Fotaki M. Are all consumers the same? Choice in health, social care and education in England and elsewhere. Public Money Manage 2009;29:87–94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar