Self-reported function and disability in late life – cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Swedish version of the late-life function and disability instrument

References

• Crawford SL, Jette AM, Tennstedt SL. Test–retest reliability of self-reported disability measures in older adults. J Amer Geriat Soc 1997;45:338–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette AM, Haley SM, Ni P, Olarsch S, Moed R. Creating a computer adaptive test version of the Late-Life Function & Disability Instrument. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2008;63:1246–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley SM, Lidlow LH, Kooyoomjian JT. Extending the range of functional assessment in older adults: development of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument. J Aging Phys Act 2002;10:453–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley SM, Jette AM, Coster WJ, et al. Late Life Function and Disability Instrument: II. Development and evaluation of the function component. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2002;57:M217–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubuc N, Haley SM, Ni PS, et al. Function and disability in late life: Comparison of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument to the Short-Form-36 and the London Disability Scale. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:362–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayers S, Jette A, Haley S, et al. Validation of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI). J Amer Geriat Soc 2004;52:1–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Late–Life FDITM [internet]. Boston: Boston University School of Public Health. Available from http://sph.bu.edu/HDRI/llfdi/menu-id-617771.html [last accessed 15 February 2012]
   Google Scholar
• McAuley E, Konopack JF, Motl RW, et al. Measuring disability and function in older women: psychometric properties of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument. J Gerontol 2005;60:901–9
   Google Scholar
• Shin KR, Byeon YS, Kang Y, Oak J. A study on physical symptom, activity of daily living, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the community dwelling older adults. J Korean Acad Nurs 2008;38:437–44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melzer I, Kurz I, Sarid O, Jette AM. Relationship between self-reported function and disability and balance performance measures in the elderly. J Rehabil Res Dev 2007;44:685–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson K, Day L, Hill KD, et al. Screening for pre-clinical disability in different residential settings. BMC Geriatr 2010;10:52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lapier TK, Mizner R. Outcome measures in cardiopulmonary physical therapy: Focus on the late life function and disability instrument (LLFDI). Cardiopulm Phys Ther J 2009;20:32–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LeBrasseur NK, Sayers SP, Ouellette MM, Fielding RA. Muscle impairments and behavioral factors mediate functional limitations and disability following stroke. Phys Ther 2006;86:1342–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:1417–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. ‘Mini-mental state’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Luria R. Reliability, validity, and clinical application of the Visual Analogue Mood Scale. Psychol Med 1973;3:479–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE Jr., Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, et al. Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1995;33:AS264–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand C, Richardson J, Letts L, Stratford P. Construct validity of the late life function and disability instrument for adults with chronic conditions. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:50–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. Br Med J 1992;305:160–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Rogers W, et al. The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1992;30:MS253–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stansfeld SA, Roberts R, Foot SP. Assessing the validity of the SF-36 general health survey. Qual Life Res 1997;6:217–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DC. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat 2007;17:571–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Comput Biol Med 1990;20:337–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George D, Mallery P. SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. 11.0 update, 4th ed. Boston (MA): Allyn & Bacon; 2003
   Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr., Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993;31:247–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995;4:293–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abizanda P, Lopez-Jiménez M, López-Torres J, et al. Validation of the Spanish version of the Short-Form Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011;59:893–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx RG, Menezes A, Horovitz L, et al. A comparison of two time intervals for test–retest reliability of health status instruments. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:730–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar