“What do you expect from physiotherapy?”: a detailed analysis of goal setting in physiotherapy

References

• Locke EA, Latham GP. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. Am Psychol 2002;57:705–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scobbie L, Wyke S, Dixon D. Identifying and applying psychological theory to setting and achieving rehabilitation goals. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:321–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Physioswiss. Profil professionnel de la physiothérapie. Sursee: Swiss Physiotherapy Association; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Wade D. Goal setting in rehabilitation: an overview of what, why and how. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:291–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovend’Eerdt TJH, Botell RE, Wade, DT. Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:352–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosewilliam S, Roskell CA, Pandyan AD. A systematic review and synthesis of the quantitative and qualitative evidence behind patient-centred goal setting in stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2011;25:501–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levack WMM, Dean SG, Siegert RJ, McPherson KM. Navigating patient-centered goal setting in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: how clinicians control the process to meet perceived professional responsibilities. Patient Educ Couns 2011;85:206–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugavanam T, Mead G, Bulley C, et al. The effects and experiences of goal setting in stroke rehabilitation – a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2013;35:177–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry R. Communication during goal-setting in physiotherapy treatment sessions. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:668–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard RA, Cruice MN, Playford ED. Strategies used in the pursuit of achievability during goal setting in rehabilitation. Qual Health Res 2010;20:239–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage J. Questioning in medicine. In: Freed AF, Ehrlich S, eds. “Why do you ask?”: the function of questions in institutional discourse. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2010:42–68
   Google Scholar
• Heritage J, Clayman S. Talk in action: interactions, identities and institutions. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Clayman SE, Gill VT. Conversation analysis. In: Bryman HM, ed. Handbook of data analysis. London: Sage; 2004:589–606
   Google Scholar
• Barnes R. Conversation analysis: a practical resource in the health care setting. Med Educ 2005;39:113–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage J, Maynard DW. Communication in medical care: interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge: University Press; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Pilnick A. “Why didn't you just say that?”: dealing with issues of asymmetry, knowledge and competence in the pharmacist/client encounter. Sociol Health Ill 1998;20:29–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones A. Creating history: documents and patient participation in nurse-patient interviews. Soc Health Ill 2009;31:907–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denman A, Wilkinson, R. Applying conversation analysis to traumatic brain injury: investigating touching another person in everyday social interaction. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:243–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew P, Chatwin J, Collins S. Conversation analysis: a method for research into interactions between patients and health-care. Health Expect 2001;4:58–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parry R. Practitioners’ accounts for treatment actions and recommendations in physiotherapy: when do they occur, how are they structured, what do they do? Soc Health Ill 2009;31:835–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin C. From other to self. Learning as interactional change [dissertation]. Sweden: University of Uppsala; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Ten Have P. Doing conversation analysis: a practical guide. London: Sage; 1999
   Google Scholar
• WMA (World Medical Association). Declaration of Helsinki – ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 2008. Available from: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html [last accessed 20 Feb 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Heritage J. Conversation analysis and institutional talk: analysing data. In: Silverman D, ed. Qualitative research: theory, method and practice. London: Sage; 2004:222–45
   Google Scholar
• Heritage J. Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In: Fitch KL, Sanders RE, eds. Handbook of language and social interaction. Marwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 2005:103–47
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson G. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In: Lerner GH, ed. Conversation analysis: studies from the first generation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins; 2004:ix–xvi
   Google Scholar
• Hakaana M. Laughter in medical interaction: from quantification to analysis, and back. J Socioling 2002;6:207–35
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff EA. Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: University Press; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff EA, Lerner GH. Beginning to respond: well-prefaced responses to wh-questions. Res Lang Soc Interac 2009;42:91–115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin C, Heritage J. Conversation analysis. Ann Rev Anthropol 1990;19:283–307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage J, Raymond G. The terms of agreement: indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Soc Psychol Quart 2005;68:15–38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers T, Mondada L, Steensig J. Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. In: Stivers T, Mondada L, Steensig J, eds. The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: University Press; 2011:3–24
   Google Scholar
• Enfield NJ. Sources of asymmetry in human interaction: enchrony, status, knowledge and agency. In: Stivers T, Mondada L, Steensig J, eds. The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: University Press; 2011:285–312
   Google Scholar
• Hayano K. Claiming epistemic primacy: yo-marked assessments in Japanese. In: Stivers T, Mondada L, Steensig J, eds. The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: University Press; 2011:58–81
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann T, Lindström A, Steensig J. Addressing epistemic incongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbs. In: Stivers T, Mondada L, Steensig J, eds. The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: University Press; 2011:107–30
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä A. Agency and authority: extended responses to diagnostic statements in primary care encounters. Res Lang Soc Interac 2002;35:219–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilnick A. “There are no rights and wrongs in these situations”: identifying interactional difficulties in genetic counselling. Soc Health Ill 2002;24:66–88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage J, Sefi S. Dilemmas of advice: aspects of the delivery and reception of advice between health visitors and first time mothers. In: Drew P, Heritage J, eds. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: University Press; 1992:359–417
   Google Scholar
• Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making – the pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med 2012;366:780–1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, et al. Preferences of patients for patient-centred approach to consultation in primary care: observational study. BMJ 2001;322:486--72
   Google Scholar
• Leach E, Cornwell P, Fleming J, Haines T. Patient centered goal-setting in a subacute rehabilitation setting. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:1419–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariss S. Asymmetrical knowledge claims in general practice consultations with frequent attending patients: limitations and opportunities for patient participation. Soc Sci Med 2009;69:908–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoeb V. “What do you expect from physiotherapy?”: a conversation analytic approach to goal setting in physiotherapy [dissertation]. UK: University of Nottingham (unpublished)
   Google Scholar
• Collins S, Britten N, Ruusuvuori J, Thompson A. Patient participation in health care consultations: qualitative perspectives. McGraw Hill: Open University Press; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Schoeb V, Burge E. Perceptions of patients and physiotherapists on patient participation: a narrative synthesis of qualitative studies. Physiother Res Int 2012;17:80--91
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä A, Vehviläinen S. Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge. Discourse Soc 2003;14:727–50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar