Quantitative studies of validity: expanding our understanding of disability

References

• Wilson M. Seeking a balance between the statistical and scientific elements in psychometrics. Psychometrika 2013;78:211–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode RK, Heinemann AW, Semik P. Measurement properties of the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test (GOAT) and improvement patterns during inpatient rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2000;15:637–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogner JA, Corrigan JD, Bode RK, Heinemann AW. Rating scale analysis of the Agitated Behavior Scale. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2000;15:656–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doninger NA, Bode RK, Heinemann AW, Ambrose C. Rating scale analysis of the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2000;15:683–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta F, Caselli S, Ianes AB, et al. Can we scientifically and reliably measure the level of consciousness in Vegetative and Minimally Conscious States? Rasch analysis of the Coma Recovery Scale Revised. Archiv Phys Med Rehabil 2013;94:527–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright S. The relative importance of heredity and environment in determining the piebald pattern of guinea-pigs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1920;6:320–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fox J. Structural equation modeling with the sem package in R. Struct Equat Model 2006;13:465–86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zumbo B. Validity: foundational issues in statistical methodology. Handbook Statist 2007;26:45–79
   Google Scholar
• Boorsboom D. Attack of the pscyhometricians. Psychometrika 2006;71:425–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthen B. A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika 1984;49:115–32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan K-H, Bentler PM. Structural equation modeling. Handbook Statist 2007;26:297–358
   Google Scholar
• Fischer GH. Rasch models. Handbook Statist 2007;26:515–85
   Google Scholar
• Wright BD, Mok M. Rasch models overview. J Appl Measure 2000;1:83–106
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson MS. Hierarchical item response theory models. Handbook Statist 2007;26:587–606
   Google Scholar
• Ramsay J. Kernel smoothing approaches to nonparametric item characteristic curve estimation. Psychometrika 1991;56:611–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sijtsma K, Hemker BT. Nonparametric polytomous IRT model for invariant item ordering, with results for parametric models. Psychometrika 1998;63:183–200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Schuur WH. Mokken scale analysis: between the guttman scale and parametric item response theory. Polit Anal 2003;11:139–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays RD, Morales LS, Reise SP. Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Med Care 2000;38:II28–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckase MD. The past and future of multidimensional item response theory. Appl Psychol Measure 1997;21:25–36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock RD, Moutaski I. Item response theory in a general framework. Handbook Statist 2007;26:469–513
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber JB, Nora A, Stage FK, et al. Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. J Educ Res 2006;99:323–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, et al. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:461–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz GJ, Haycock GB, Edelmann CM, Jr Spitzer A. A simple estimate of glomerular filtration rate in children derived from body length and plasma creatinine. Pediatrics 1976;58:259–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule AD, Larson TS, Bergstralh EJ, et al. Using serum creatinine to estimate glomerular filtration rate: accuracy in good health and in chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:929–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MS. Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item response models in R. J Statist Software 2007;20:1–24
   Google Scholar
• Andersen EB. Georg Rasch. Psychometrika 1982;47:375–6
   Google Scholar
• Lord FM. Item characteristic curves estimated without knowledge of their mathematical form – a confrontation of Birnbaum's logistic model. Psychometrika 1970;35:43–50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaminathan H, Hambleton RK, Rogers HJ. Assessing the fit of item response theory models. Handbook Statist 2007;26:683–718
   Google Scholar
• Kane MT. Current concerns in validity theory. J Educ Measure 2001;38:319–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrard P, Goldstein R, Divita MA, et al. Validity and reliability of the FIM instrument in the inpatient burn rehabilitation population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013;94:1521–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stineman MG, Shea JA, Jette A, et al. The functional independence measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1101–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosseau L, Potvin L, Philippe P, et al. The construct validity of the functional independence measure as applied to stroke patients. Physiother Theory Pract 1996;12:161–71
   Google Scholar
• Disler PB, Roy CW, Smith BP. Predicting hours of care needed. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:139–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard B, Johnston M, Dieppe P. Exploring the relationships between International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) constructs of Impairment, Activity Limitation and Participation Restriction in people with osteoarthritis prior to joint replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011;12:97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar