Costs of production loss and primary health care interventions for return-to-work of sick-listed workers in Sweden

References

• Steenstra IA, Anema JR, van Tulder MW, et al. Economic evaluation of a multi-stage return to work program for workers on sick-leave due to low back pain. J Occup Rehabil 2006;16:557–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oostrom SH, Heymans MW, de Vet HC, et al. Economic evaluation of a workplace intervention for sick-listed employees with distress. Occup Environ Med 2010;67:603–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen C, Nielsen CV, Jensen OK, Petersen KD. Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of a multidisciplinary intervention compared to a brief intervention to facilitate return to work in sick-listed low-back pain patients. Spine 2013;38:1057–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeulen SJ, Heymans MW, Anema JR, et al. Economic evaluation of a participatory return-to-work intervention for temporary agency and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 2013;39:46–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, et al.; Institute for Work & Health (IWH). Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. Workplace-Based RTW Intervention Literature Review Research Team. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15:607–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll C, Rick J, Pilgrim H, et al. Workplace involvement improves return to work rates among employees with back pain on long-term sick leave: a systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:607–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamberg-van Reenen HH, Proper KI, van den Berg M. Worksite mental health interventions: a systematic review of economic evaluations. Occup Environ Med 2012;69:837–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer KT, Harris EC, Linaker C, et al. Effectiveness of community- and workplace-based interventions to manage musculoskeletal-related sickness absence and job loss: a systematic review. Rheumatology 2012;51:230–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM. A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The Netherlands. Pain 1995;62:233–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yelin E, Callahan LF. The economic cost and social and psychological impact of musculoskeletal conditions. National Arthritis Data Work Groups. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38:1351–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambeek LC, van Tulder MW, Swinkels IC, et al. The trend in total cost of back pain in The Netherlands in the period 2002 to 2007. Spine 2011;36:1050–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell G, Burton K. Is work good for your health and well-being? London: HMSO; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Ekberg K, Wåhlin C, Persson J, et al. Is mobility in the labor market a solution to sustainable return to work for some sick listed persons? J Occup Rehabil 2011;21:355–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001;33:337–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilmarinen I. The work ability index. Occup Med 2007;57:160
   Google Scholar
• Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC, eds. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford (NY): Oxford University Press; 1996
   Google Scholar
• Wåhlin C, Ekberg K, Persson J, et al. Evaluation of self-reported work ability and usefulness of interventions among sick-listed patients. J Occup Rehabil 2013;23:32–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisbrod B. The valuation of human capital. J Polit Econ 1961;69:425–36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black C, Frost D. Health at work – an independent review of sickness absence. London: UK Government, Department of Work and pensions; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Nilsing E, Söderberg E, Berterö C, Öberg B. Primary health care professionals' experiences of the sick leave process. A focus group study in Sweden. J Occup Rehabil 2013;23:450–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause N, Dasinger LK, Neuhauser F. Modified work and return to work: a review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil 1998;8:113–40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uegaki K, de Bruijne MC, Lambeek L, et al. Economic evaluations of occupational health interventions from a corporate perspective – a systematic review of methodological quality. Scand J Work Environ Health 2010;36:273–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompa E, Verbeek J, van Tulder M, de Boer A. Developing guidelines for good practice in the economic evaluation of occupational safety and health interventions. Scand J Work Environ Health 2010;36:313–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bültmann U, Sheson D, Olsen J, et al. Coordinated and tailored work rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation undertaken with workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil 2009;19:81–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmanschap MA, van Ineveld BM. Towards a new approach for estimating indirect costs of disease. Soc Sci Med 1992;34:1005–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FFH, van Ineveld BM, van Roijen L. The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease. J Health Econ 1995;14:171–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannesson M, Karlsson G. The friction cost method: a comment. J Health Econ 1997;16:249–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liljas B. How to calculate indirect costs in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics 1998;13:1–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wåhlin C, Ekberg K, Persson J, et al. Association between clinical and work-related interventions and return-to-work for patients with musculoskeletal or mental disorders. J Rehabil Med 2012;44:355–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar