References
- Üstün TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, et al. Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ 2010;88:815–23
- Mont D. Measuring disability prevalence. World Bank Social Protection Discussion Paper; 2007
- Garin O, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Almansa J, et al. Validation of the “World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2” in patients with chronic diseases. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010;8:51–65
- Leonardi M, Bickenbach J, Ustun TB, et al. The definition of disability: what is in a name? Lancet 2006;368:1219–21
- Üstün TB. Measuring health and disability: manual for WHO disability assessment schedule WHODAS 2.0. World Health Organization; 2010
- Von Korff M, Crane PK, Alonso J, et al. Modified WHODAS-II provides valid measure of global disability but filter items increased skewness. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:1132–43
- Hu L, Zang YL, Li N. The applicability of WHODAS 2.0 in adolescents in China. J Clin Nurs 2012;21:2438–51
- Zhao HP, Liu Y. Reliability and validity tests of the Chinese Version WHO DAS II in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. J China Med Univ 2011;4:323–6
- Zhao HP, Liu Y, Li HL, et al. Activity limitation and participation restrictions of breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: psychometric properties and validation of the Chinese version of the WHODAS 2.0. Qual Life Res 2013;22:897–906
- Ho RT, Au Yeung FS, Lo PH, et al. Tai-chi for residential patients with schizophrenia on movement coordination, negative symptoms, and functioning: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2012;2012:923925
- Law K, Yau S, Wan D, Chan C. Relationship between perceived quality of life, social functioning, and life skills performance of patients with chronic psychiatric conditions in a long stay care home. Hong Kong J Psychiatry 2002;12:2–7
- Li M, Wang CF, Gu SX, et al. Adapted simplified Chinese (mainland) version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire. Spine 2009;34:1321–4
- Hong Kong Rehabilitation Programme Plan [Internet]. Labour and Welfare Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Goeverment. Avaialable from: http://www.lwb.gov.hk/eng/advisory/rac/rpp_report.htm [last accessed 23 Sep 2014]
- Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press; 2011
- Lam CL, Van Weel C, Lauder IJ. Can the Dartmouth COOP/WONCA charts be used to assess the functional status of Chinese patients? Family Pract 1994;11:85–94
- Marsh HW, Hocevar D. Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: first and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychol Bull 1985;97:562–82
- Hu Lt, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 1999;6:1–55
- Darren G, Mallery P. SPSS for windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 1999
- Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34–42
- Luciano JV, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Fernandez A, et al. Psychometric properties of the twelve item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II) in Spanish primary care patients with a first major depressive episode. J Affect Disord 2010;121:52–8
- Pösl M, Cieza A, Stucki G. Psychometric properties of the WHODASII in rehabilitation patients. Qual Life Res 2007;16:1521–31
- Luciano JV, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Fernandez A, et al. Utility of the twelve-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II) for discriminating depression “caseness” and severity in Spanish primary care patients. Qual Life Res 2010;19:97–101
- Chwastiak LA, Von Korff M. Disability in depression and back pain: evaluation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO DAS II) in a primary care setting. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:507–14
- Fried LP, Bandeen-Roche K, Kasper JD, Guralnik JM. Association of comorbidity with disability in older women: the Women’s Health and Aging Study. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52:27–37
- Muthén LK, Muthén. BO. Mplus user’s guide. 7th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 2012
- Leonardi M. Measuring health and disability: supporting policy development. The European MHADIE project. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:S1–8
- Kostanjsek N. Use of The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health information systems. BMC Public Health 2011;11:S3
- Chisolm TH, Abrams HB, McArdle R, et al. The WHO-DAS II: psychometric properties in the measurement of functional health status in adults with acquired hearing loss. Trends Amplif 2005;9:111–26
- Kucukdeveci AA, Kutlay S, Yildizlar D, et al. The reliability and validity of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-II) in stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2013;35:214–20
- Meesters JJ, Verhoef J, Liem IS, et al. Validity and responsiveness of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II to assess disability in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatology 2010;49:326–33
- Schlote A, Richter M, Wunderlich M, et al. WHODAS II with people after stroke and their relatives. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:855–64
- Federici S, Meloni F, Mancini A, et al. World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II: contribution to the Italian validation. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:553–64