Capturing complexity in work disability research: application of system dynamics modeling methodology

References

• Prins R. Sickness absence and disability: an international perspective. In: Loisel P, Anema JR, eds. Handbook of work disability. New York (NY): Springer; 2013:3–14
   Google Scholar
• Shaw WS, Kristman VL, Vezina N. Workplace issues. In: Anema JR, Loisel P, eds. Hanbook of work disability. New York (NY): Springer; 2013:163–202
   Google Scholar
• Williams RM, Westmorland M. Perpectives on workplace disability management: a review of the literature. Work 2002;19:87–93
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaw WS, Findley PA, Feurstein M. Twenty years of multidisciplinary research and practice. J Occup Res 2011;21:449–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa-Black KM, Feuerstein M, Loisel P. Work disability models: past and present. Handbook of work disability. New York (NY): Springer; 2013:71–93
   Google Scholar
• Sterman JD. Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 2000
   Google Scholar
• Maani KE, Cavana RY. Systems thinking, system dynamics. Auckland, New Zealand: Pearson; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Angerhofer BJ, Angelides MC. System dynamics modelling in supply chain management: research review. IEEE 2000;1:342–51
   Google Scholar
• Cavana RY, Boyd DM, Taylor RJ. A systems thinking study of retention and recruitment issues for the New Zealand Army Electronic Technician Trade Group. Syst Res Behav Sci 2007;24:201–16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homer JB, Hirsch GB. System dynamics modeling for public health: background and opportunities. Am J Publ Health 2006;96:452–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leveson N, Daouk M, Nicolas D, Marais K. Applying STAMP in accident analysis. September 2003 Available from: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20030111708.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leveson N, Dulac N, Zipkin D, et al. Engineering resilience into safety-critical systems. Resilience engineering–concepts and precepts. Aldershot, London: Ashgate; 2006:95–123
   Google Scholar
• Hamdani Y, Jetha A, Norman C. Systems thinking perspectives applied to healthcare transition for youth with disabilities: a paradigm shift for practice, policy and research. Child: Care Health Dev 2011;37:806–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong JJ, McGregor M, Mior SA, Loisel P. Examination of the relationship between theory-driven policies and allowed lost-time back claims in workers' compensation: a system dynamics model. J Manipul Physiol Therapeut 2014;37:7–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Theory, research, and practice in health behaviour and health education. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, eds. Health behaviour and health education: theory, research and practice. Vol. 4. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 2008:23–38
   Google Scholar
• Green J. The role of theory in evidence-based health promotion practice. Health Educ Res 2000;15:125–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye RA. The evolution of the concept of medicalization in the late twentieth century. J Hist Behav Sci 2003;39:115–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz I, Stowell A, Feuerstein M, Gatchel R. Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil 2007;17:327–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons T. The social system glencoe. Wilmington (IL): The Free Press; 1951
   Google Scholar
• Keyes KB, Wickizer TM, Franklin G. Two-year health and employment outcomes among injured workers enrolled in the Washington State Managed Care Pilot Project. Am J Indus Med 2001;40:619–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Durand MJ, Berthelette D, et al. Disability prevention: new paradigm for the management of occupational back pain. Dis Manage Health Outcome 2001;9:351–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuerstein M, Todd BL, Moskowitz MC, et al. Work in cancer survivors: a model for practice and research. J Cancer Survivorship 2010;4:415–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heerkens Y, Engels J, Kuiper C, et al. The use of the ICF to describe work related factors influencing the health of employees. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:1060–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Durand P, Abenhaim L, et al. Management of occupational back pain: the Sherbrooke model. Results of a pilot and feasibility study. Occup Environ Med 1994;51:597–602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S, Chambers L. The “toxic dose” of system problems: why some injured workers don't return to work as expected. J Occup Rehabil 2010;20:349–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows DH. Thinking in systems: a primer. White River Junction (VT): Chelsea Green Publishing Company; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Baker K, Pope J. Employment and work disability in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009;48:281–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vick A, Lightman E. Barriers to employment among women with complex episodic disabilities. J Disabil Pol Stud 2010;21:70–80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayon P, Hancock P, Leveson N, et al. Sociotechnical systems for occupational safety: new research directions. Ergonomics (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E. The ETTO principle: efficiency-thoroughness trade-off: why things that go right sometimes go wrong. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Hettinger LJ, Kleiner BM, DeJoy DM, et al. Sociotechnical attributes of safe and unsafe systems. Ergonomics (in press)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N. Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Aldershot, London: Ashgate; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Norman CD. Health promotion as a systems science and practice. J Eval Clin Pract 2009;15:868–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sussman JM. Understanding and designing complex sociotechnical systems. MIT SDM Systems Thinking Webinar 2013:1–43 Available from: http://sdm.mit.edu/news/news_articles/webinar_040813/sussman-webinar-sociotechnical-systems.html
   Google Scholar
• Milstein B, Jones A, Homer JB, et al. Charting plausible futures for diabetes prevalence in the United States: a role for system dynamics simulation modeling. Prevent Chronic Dis 2007;4:1–8
   Google Scholar
• Trochim WM, Cabrera DA, Milstein B, et al. Practical challenges of systems thinking and modeling in public health. Am J Publ Health 2006;96:538–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homer J, Milstein B, Labarthe D, et al. Simulating and evaluating local interventions to improve cardiovascular health. Prevent Chronic Dis 2010;7:A18
   Google Scholar
• Homer J, Jones A, Seville D, et al. The CDC's diabetes systems modeling project: developing a new tool for chronic disease prevention and control. Submitted to the 22nd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, 2004 Jul 25–29, Oxford, England. Available from: http://www.donellameadows.org/wp-content/userfiles/Diabetes_SystemISDC04.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch GB, Levine R, Miller R. Using system dynamics modeling to understand the impact of social change initiatives. Am J Commun Psychol 2007;39:239–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vennix JAM. Group model-building: tackling messy problems. System Dynam Rev 1999;15:379–401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• iSee Systems. 2012 Sept 20. iThink systems thinking for business. Available from: http://www.iseesystems.com/Softwares/Business/ithinkSoftware.aspx%3E [last accessed 20 Sept 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Ventana Systems Inc. 25 Dec 2013. Available from: Vensim. htttp://www.vensim.com [last accessed 25 Dec 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Jackson MC. Systems dynamics. Systems thinking: creative holism for managers. West Sussex, UK: Wiley; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Benn J, Healey AN, Hollnagel E. Improving performance reliability in surgical systems. Cogn Tech Work 2008;10:323–33
   Google Scholar
• Holling CS. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 2001;4:390–405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester JW. Industrial dynamics. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press; 1961
   Google Scholar
• Forrester JW. System dynamics and K-12 teachers. A lecture at the University of Virginia School of Education. Cambridge (MA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1996 May 30 [last accessed 8 Aug 2014]
   Google Scholar