590
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspectives in Rehabilitation

Expert consensus on best evaluative practices in community-based rehabilitation

, , &
Pages 499-510 | Received 12 Jan 2015, Accepted 20 Apr 2015, Published online: 11 May 2015

References

  • ILO, UNESCO, WHO. The CBR matrix. 2004. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/cbr/cbr_matrix_11.10.pdf [last accessed 27 Feb 2013]
  • WHO, UNESCO, ILO, IDDC. CBR guidelines. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010
  • Finkenflugel H, Wolffers I, Huijsman R. The evidence base for community-based rehabilitation: a literature review. Int J Rehabil Res 2005;28:187–201
  • Cornielje H, Velema JP, Finkenflugel H. Community based rehabilitation programmes: monitoring and evaluation in order to measure results. Leprosy Rev 2008;79:36–49
  • Finkenflugel H, Cornieje H, Velema J. The use of classification models in the evaluation of CBR programmes. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:348–54
  • Thomas M. Reflections on community-based rehabilitation. Psychol Dev Soc 2011;23:277–91
  • Chung EY, Packer TL, Yau M. A framework for evaluating community-based rehabilitation programmes in Chinese communities. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:1668–82
  • Adeoye A, Seeley J, Hartley S. Developing a tool for evaluating community-based rehabilitation in Uganda. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:1110–24
  • Lukersmith S, Hartley S, Kuipers P, et al. Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) monitoring and evaluation methods and tools: a literature review. Dis Rehabil 2013;35:1941–53
  • Grandisson M, Hébert M, Thibeault R. A systematic review on how to conduct evaluations in community-based rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2014;36:265–75
  • Grandisson M, Thibeault R, Hébert M, Templeton A. Lessons learned in the field about evaluation strategies for community-based rehabilitation. Disabil CBR Incl Dev 2014;25:55–71
  • Bowker R, Lachanpaul M, Atkinson M, et al. How to write a guideline from start to finish: a handbook for healthcare professionals. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingston Elsevier; 2008
  • Dalkey NC, Helmer-Hirschberg O. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Santa Monica (CA): The RAND Corporation; 1962
  • Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna H. The Delphi technique in nursing and health research. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011
  • Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 2000;32:1008–15
  • Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, et al. Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2014;64:401–9
  • Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE; 2013
  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago (IL): Aldine Publishing Company; 1967
  • Rossi PH, Lipsey MW, Freeman HE. Evaluation: a systematic approach. 7th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 2004
  • United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2008. Available from: http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml [last accessed 17 Feb 2014]
  • ILO, UNESCO, WHO. Joint position paper. CBR: a strategy for rehabilitation, equalization of opportunities, poverty reduction and social inclusion of people with disabilities. Geneva: WHO Press; 2004. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/cbr/en/ [last accessed 17 Feb 2014]
  • Boyce W, Ballantyne S. Developing CBR through evaluation. Asia Pacific Disabil Rehabil J 2000 Series 2: CBR in transition:69–83
  • Price P, Kuipers P. CBR action research: current status and future trends. Asia Pacific Disabil Rehabil J 2000:55–68. Available from: http://english.aifo.it/disability/apdrj/selread100/index.htm
  • Mitchell R. The research base of community-based rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 1999;21:459–68
  • Patton MQ. Essentials of utilization-focused evaluation. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 2012
  • Fetterman DM, Wandersman A. Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. New York: Guilford Press; 2005
  • Wirz S, Thomas M. Evaluation of community-based rehabilitation programmes: a search for appropriate indicators. Int J Rehabil Res 2002;25:163–71
  • Sharma M. Viable methods for evaluation of community-based rehabilitation programmes. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:326–34
  • Kuipers P, Harknett S. Guess editorial. Considerations in the quest for evidence in community based rehabilitation. Asia Pacific Disabil Rehabil J 2008;19:3–14

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.