443
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Responsiveness of selected outcome measures of participation restriction and quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis

, , , &
Pages 482-486 | Received 07 Oct 2014, Accepted 21 Apr 2015, Published online: 08 May 2015

References

  • Cohen JA. The future of multiple sclerosis treatment. J Neurol Sci 2009;1:S55–61
  • Stuve O. Knowns and unknowns in the future of multiple sclerosis treatment. J Neurol Sci 2009;1:S30–6
  • Taylor B, McDonald E, Fantino B, et al. The cost of multiple sclerosis in Australia. J Clin Neurosci 2007;14:532–9
  • Minnes P, Carlson P, McColl MA, et al. Community integration: a useful construct, but what does it really mean? Brain injury 2003;17:149–59
  • Willer B, Ottenbacher KJ, Coad ML. The community integration questionnaire. A comparative examination. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994;73:103–11
  • Ghaem H, Borhani Haghighi A, Jafari P, Nikseresht AR. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the multiple sclerosis quality of life questionnaire. Neurol India 2007;55:369–75
  • Hirsh AT, Braden AL, Craggs JG, Jensen MP. Psychometric properties of the community integration questionnaire in a heterogeneous sample of adults with physical disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:1602–10
  • Negahban H, Fattahizadeh P, Ghasemzadeh R, et al. The Persian version of Community Integration Questionnaire in persons with multiple sclerosis: translation, reliability, validity, and factor analysis. Disabil Rehabil 2013;35:1453–9
  • Negahban H, Rezaie S, Goharpey S. Massage therapy and exercise therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled pilot study. Clin Rehabil 2013;27:1126–36
  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Katz JN, Wright JG. A taxonomy for responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:1204–17
  • French HP, Fitzpatrick M, FitzGerald O. Responsiveness of physical function outcomes following physiotherapy intervention for osteoarthritis of the knee: an outcome comparison study. Physiotherapy 2011;97:302–8
  • Guyatt GH, Deyo RA, Charlson M, et al. Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement: a clarification. J Clin Epidemiol 1989;42:403–8
  • Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL. Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Phys Ther 1996;76:1109–23
  • Tuley MR, Mulrow CD, McMahan CA. Estimating and testing an index of responsiveness and the relationship of the index to power. J Clin Epidemiol 1991;44:417–21
  • Houweling TA. Reporting improvement from patient-reported outcome measures: a review. Clin Chiropract 2010;13:15–22
  • Kurtzke JE. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983;33:1444–52
  • Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther 2009;17:163–70
  • Ma C, Wu S, Xiao L, Xue Y. Responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 2011;20:475–81
  • de Vet HC, Bouter LM, Bezemer PD, Beurskens AJ. Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures. Theoretical considerations illustrated by an empirical example. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2001;17:479–87
  • Lehman LA, Sindhu BS, Shechtman O, et al. A comparison of the ability of two upper extremity assessments to measure change in function. J Hand Ther 2010;23:31–9
  • Lehman LA, Velozo CA. Ability to detect change in patient function: responsiveness designs and methods of calculation. J Hand Ther 2010;23:361–70
  • Negahban H, Mostafaee N, Sohani SM, et al. Responsiveness and minimally important differences for selected Persian-version of outcome measures used in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Disabil Rehabil 2014;22:1–6
  • Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:459–68
  • Stratford PW, Riddle DL. Assessing sensitivity to change: choosing the appropriate change coefficient. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005;3:23--30
  • Deyo RA, Centor RM. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis 1986;39:897–906
  • Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Vahdaninia M, Gandek B. The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Qual Life Res 2005;14:875–82
  • Norman GR, Stratford P, Regehr G. Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:869–79

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.