851
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Validity and sensitivity to change of the Patient Specific Functional Scale used during rehabilitation following proximal humeral fracture

, , &
Pages 487-492 | Received 13 Oct 2014, Accepted 21 Apr 2015, Published online: 11 May 2015

References

  • Horak J, Nilsson BE. Epidemiology of fracture of the upper end of the humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975;112:250–3
  • Lind T, Krøner K, Jensen J. The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1989;108:285–7
  • Zyto K, Ahrengart L, Sperber A, Törnkvist H. Treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997;79:412–17
  • Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 2001;72:365–71
  • Geiger EV, Maier M, Kelm A, et al. Functional outcome and complications following PHILOS plate fixation in proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2010;44:1–6
  • Lanting B, MacDermid J, Drosdowech D, Faber KJ. Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalities. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17:42–54
  • Vallier HA. Treatment of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2007;21:469–76
  • Basti JJ, Dionysian E, Sherman PW, Bigliani LU. Management of proximal humeral fractures. J Hand Ther 1994;7:111–21
  • Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures: Part II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1970;52-A:1090–103
  • Chatman AB, Hyams SP, Neel JM, et al. The patient-specific functional scale: measurement properties in patients with knee dysfunction. Phys Ther 1997;77:820–9
  • Westaway MD, Stratford PW, Binkley JM. The patient-specific functional scale: validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998;27:331–8
  • Tugwell P, Bombardier C, Buchanan WW, et al. The MACTAR Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire – an individualized functional priority approach for assessing improvement in physical disability in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1987;14:446–51
  • MacKenzie CR, Charlson ME, DiGioia D, Kelley K. A patient-specific measure of change in maximal function. Arch Intern Med 1986;146:1325–9
  • Stratford PW, Gill C, Westaway MD, Binkley JM. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: a report of a patient specific measure. Physiother Can 1995;47:258–63
  • Hefford C, Abbott JH, Arnold R, Baxter GD. The patient-specific functional scale: validity, reliability, and responsiveness in patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal problems. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42:56–65
  • Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Palmer JA. The reliability and construct validity of the Neck Disability Index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Spine (PA 1976) 2006;31:598–602
  • Rosengren J, Brodin N. Validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the patient specific functional scale in patients treated surgically for carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. J Hand Ther 2013;26:53–61
  • Pless M, Granlund M. Handbok i att använda ICF och ICF-CY. 1st ed. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2011: 210 s. p. 11–25, 112–114, 186–188
  • World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). [Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Trans.]. Vol 4. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen; 2003:2
  • Fairbairn K, May K, Yang Y, et al. Mapping patient-specific functional scale (PSFS) items to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Phys Ther 2012;92:310–17
  • Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, et al. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. The Committee on Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials. Arthritis Rheum 1993;36:729–40
  • Jones SD, Steiner A, Garrett SL, Calin A. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Patient Global Score (BAS-G). Br J Rheumatol 1996;35:66–71
  • Boström C, Harms-Ringdahl K, Nordemar R. Clinical reliability of shoulder function assessment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 1991;20:36–48
  • Sjukgymnastförbundet (LSR). Available from: http://www.sjukgymnastforbundet.se http://217.198.157.139/lsr/recordlist.php 131101, kl 14:05 [last accessed 29 Apr 2015]
  • Boström C, Harms-Ringdahl K, Nordemar R. Relationships between measurements of impairment, disability, pain, and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients with shoulder problems. Scand J Rheumatol 1995;24:352–9
  • Nordenskiöld UM, Grimby G. Grip force in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia and in healthy subjects: a study with the Grippit instrument. Scand J Rheumatol 1993;22:14–19
  • Lagerström C, Nordgren B. On the reliability and usefulness of methods for grip strength measurement. Scand J Rehabil Med 1998;30:113–9
  • Lo IK, Griffin S, Kirkley A. The development of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for osteoarthritis of the shoulder: the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001;9:771–8
  • Kirkley A, Griffin S, Dainty K. Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 2003;19:1109–20
  • Hultenheim Klintberg I, Lind K, Marlow T, Svantesson U. Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Shoulder (WOOS) index: a cross-cultural adaptation into Swedish, including evaluation of reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with subacromial pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012;21:1698–705
  • Svenska Skulder- och Armbågssällskapet (SSAS). Available from: http://www.ssas.se/files/score_shoulder/WOOS.pdf 131101, kl 11:20 [last accessed 29 Apr 2015]
  • Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL. Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Phys Ther 1996;10:1109–23
  • WHO-ICF browser. Available from: http://apps.who.int/classifications/icfbrowser/ 120218, kl 11:55 [last accessed 29 Apr 2015]
  • Olsson H, Sörensen S. Forskningsprocessen: kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. 3rd ed. Stockholm: Liber; 2011: 328 s, 123–126, 225, 249–251
  • Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012: 802 s, 339, 392, 421–422
  • Carter RE, Lubinsky J, Domholdt E. Rehabilitation research: principles and applications. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2011: vii, 503 s, 318
  • Munro BH. Statistical methods for health care research. 4th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott; 2001: 459 s, 234

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.