Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and home-based occupational therapy for upper limb motor impairment following intracerebral hemorrhage: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

References

• Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 1997;349:1436–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnan GA, Fisher M, Macleod M, et al. Stroke. Lancet 2008;371:1612–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:741–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. The international classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Reiss AP, Wolf SL, Hammel EA, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT): current perspectives and future directions. Stroke Res Treat 2012;2012:159391
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hao Z, Wang D, Zeng Y, Liu M. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;5:CD008862
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marquez J, van Vliet P, McElduff P, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): does it have merit in stroke rehabilitation? A systematic review. Int J Stroke 2013;10:306–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler AJ, Shuster M, O’Hara E, et al. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb motor recovery in stroke survivors. J Hand Ther 2013;26:162–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George MS, Aston-Jones G. Noninvasive techniques for probing neurocircuitry and treating illness: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Neuropsychopharmacol Rev 2010;35:301–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:845–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? Lancet Neurol 2006;5:708–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng WW, Bowden MG, Kautz S. Review of transcranial direct current stimulation in poststroke recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil 2013;20:68–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunoni AR, Amadera J, Berbel B, et al. A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2011;14:1133–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M, Mehrholz J. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving function and activities of daily living in patients after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;11:CD009645
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Intracerebral hemorrhage versus infarction: stroke severity, risk factors, and prognosis. Ann Neurol 1995;38:45–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:399–405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:406–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregni F, Boggio PS, Mansur CG, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neuroreport 2005;16:1551–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 1985;39:386–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh K. An overview of randomization techniques: an unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research. J Hum Reprod Sci 2011;4:8–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DaSilva AF, Volz MS, Bikson M, Fregni F. Electrode positioning and montage in transcranial direct current stimulation. J Vis Exp 2011;pii:2744
   Google Scholar
• Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1969;50:311–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 2005;128:490–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoudi H, Borhani Haghighi A, Petramfar P, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: electrode montage in stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:1383–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggio PS, Nunes A, Rigonatti SP, et al. Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2007;25:123–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolognini N, Vallar G, Casati C, et al. Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011;25:819–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talelli P, Wallace A, Dileone M, et al. Theta burst stimulation in the rehabilitation of the upper limb: a semirandomized, placebo-controlled trial in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013;26:976–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey JR, Durfee WK, Bhatt E, et al. Comparison of finger tracking versus simple movement training via telerehabilitation to alter hand function and cortical reorganization after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21:216–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew P, Maas F. An interim Australian version of the Jebsen test of hand function. Aust J Physiother 1982;28:23–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, et al. A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing 2011;40:423–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S, Perera S. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the stroke impact scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:950–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebe JA, Lang CE. Relationships and responsiveness of six upper extremity function tests during the first 6 months of recovery after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther 2010;33:96–103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald JH. Handbook of biological statistics: data transformations [Internet] Available from: http://udel.edu/~mcdonald/stattransform.html [last accessed 12 May 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Fusco A, De Angelis D, Morone G, et al. The ABC of tDCS: effects of anodal, bilateral and cathodal montages of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with stroke – a pilot study. Stroke Res Treat 2013;2013:837595
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khedr EM, Shawky OA, El-Hammady DH, et al. Effect of anodal versus cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013;27:592–601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandevia SC. Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue. Physiol Rev 2001;81:1725–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogiamanian F, Marceglia S, Ardolino G, et al. Improved isometric force endurance after transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortical areas. Eur J Neurosci 2007;26:242–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiethoff S, Hamada M, Rothwell JC. Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex. Brain Stimul 2014;7:468–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar