The experiences of everyday activities post-stroke

References

• Howard G, Goff DC. Population shifts and the future of stroke: forecasts of the future burden of stroke. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2012;1268:14–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson S, Whitfield K. Social identity and stroke: ‘They dont make me feel like, there's something wrong with me'. Scand J Caring Sci 2013;27:820–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Rochette A, Noreau L, et al. Long-term changes in participation after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2006;13:86–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cott C, Wiles R, Devitt R. Continuity, transition and participation: preparing clients for life in the community post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1566–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo N, Wood-Dauphinee S, Cote R, et al. Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1035–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teoh V, Sims J, Milgrom J. Grand rounds. Psychosocial predictors of quality of life in a sample of community-dwelling stroke survivors: a longitudinal study. Top Stroke Rehabil 2009;16:157–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White J, MacKenzie L, Magin P, Pollack M. The occupational experience of stroke survivors in a community setting. OTJR: Occup Participat Health 2008;28:160–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones F, Burke R, Westman M, eds. Work-life balance: a psychological perspective. New York (NY): Psychology Press; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Jones R, Gossett A, Morgan E. Examining barriers and supports to community living and participation after a stroke from a participatory action research approach. Top Stroke Rehabil 2006;13:43–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall E, Catalano T, Kuipers P, et al. Reovery following stroke: the role of self-management education. Soc Sci Med 2007;64:735–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok T, Lo R, Wong E, et al. Quality of life of stroke survivors: a 1-year follow-up study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:1177–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch E, Butt Z, Heinemann A, et al. A qualitative study of quality of life after stroke and the importance of social relationships. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:518–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson AL, Aniansson A, Grimby G. Rehabilitation needs and disability in community living stroke survivors two years after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2000;6:30–47
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg G. Medical phenomenology and stroke rehabilitation: an introduction. Top Stroke Rehabil 2011;18:1–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP. The importance of the patient's subjective experience in stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil 2011;18:30–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourland ELR, Neville MA, Pickens ND. Loss, gain, and the reframing of perspectives in long-term stroke survivors: a dynamic experience of quality of life. Top Stroke Rehabil 2011;18:437–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young CA, Mills RJ, Gibbons C, Thornton EW. Poststroke fatigue: the patient perspective. Top Stroke Rehabil 2013;20:478–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Zeem CH, Visser-Meily JM, Lindeman E, et al. Participation in the chronic phase of stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2013;20:52–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross A, Schneider M. A preliminary analysis of the impact of hope on stroke recovery in women. Top Stroke Rehabil 2010;17:484–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilersten G, Ormstad H, Kirkevold M. Experiences of poststroke fatigue: qualitative meta-sythesis. J Adv Nurs 2012;69:514–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittman M, Boylstein C, Hinojosa R, et al. Transition experiences of stroke survivors following discharge home. Top Stroke Rehabil 2007;14:21–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JP, Connelly DM, Maly MR. ‘Getting back to real living’: a qualitative study of the process of community reintegration after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2010;24:1045–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendz M. The first year of rehabilitation after a stroke-from two perspectives. Scand J Caring Sci 2003;17:215–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke P, Black SE. Quality of life following stroke: negotiating disability, identity, and resources. J Appl Gerontol 2005;24:319–36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CD, Harrison B. The meaning and experience of being a stroke survivor: an interpretive phenomenological study. Disabil Rehabil 2004;6:808–16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter K, Hellings C, Foley N, Teasell R. The experience of living with stroke: a qualitative meta-synthesis. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:595–602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton CR. Living with stroke: a phenomenlogical study. J Adv Nurs 2000;32:301–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubina LA, Dubouloz CJ, Davis CG, et al. The process of re-engagement in personally valued activities the two years following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2013;35:236–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler D, Dubouloz CJ, Urbanowski R, Egan M. Meaning perspective transformation following stroke: the process of change. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson H. A new direction in the conceptualization and categorization of occupation. J Occup Sci 2008;15:3–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson H, Persson D. Towards an experiential model of occupational balance: an alternative perspective on flow theory analysis. J Occup Sci 2006;13:62–73
   Google Scholar
• Pierce D. Occupation by design: building therapeutic power. Philadelphia (PA): F.A. Davis Co.; 2003. 356 p
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock A. An occupational perspective of health. Thorofare (NJ): Slack Incorporated; 2006. 384 p
   Google Scholar
• Hammell K. Self-care, productivity, and leisure, or dimensions of occupational experience? Rethinking occupational “categories”. Can J Occup Ther 2009;76:107–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doble S, Santha J. Occupational well-being: rethinking occupational therapy outcomes. Can J Occup Ther 2008;75:184–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matuska K, Christiansen C. A proposed model of lifestyle balance. J Occup Sci 2008;15:9–19
   Google Scholar
• Eakman AM. Relationships between meaningful activity, basic psychological needs, and meaning in life: test of the meaningful activity and life meaning model. OTJR-Occup Participat Health 2013;33:100–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakman AM, Eklund M. The relative impact of personality traits, meaningful occupation and occupational value on meaning in life and life satisfaction. J Occup Sci 2012;19:165–77
   Google Scholar
• Harvey A. Guidelines for time use data collection and analysis. In: Pentland W, Harvey A, Lawton M, McColl M, eds. Time use research in the social sciences. New York (NY): Kluwer Academic/Plenum; 1999:19–45
   Google Scholar
• Reis HT. Why researchers should think ‘real-world': a conceptual rationale. In: Mehl MR, Conner TS, eds. Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York (NY): The Guilford Press; 2012:3–21
   Google Scholar
• Doble S, Shearer C, Lall-Phillips J, Jones S. Relation between post-stroke satisfaction with time use, perceived social support and depressive symptoms. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:476–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna K, Liddle J, Brown A, et al. Comparison of time use, role participation and life satisfaction of older people after stroke with a sample without stroke. Aust Occup Ther J 2009;56:177–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandsson L, Eklund M. Describing patterns of daily occupations: a methodological study comparing data from four different methods. Scand J Occup Ther 2001;8:31–9
   Google Scholar
• Orban K, Edberg AK, Erlandsson LK. Using a time-geographical diary method in order to facilitate reflections on changes in patterns of daily occupations. Scand J Occup Ther 2012;19:249–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKevitt C, Redfern J, Mold F, Wolfe C. Qualitative studies of stroke: a systematic review. Stroke 2004;35:1499–505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atler K. The daily experiences of pleasure, productivity and restoration profile: a measure of subjective experiences. In: Pierce D, ed. Occupational science for occupational therapy. Thorofare (NJ): SLACK Incorporated; 2014:187–99
   Google Scholar
• American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA). Occupational therapy practice framework: domain and process. 2nd ed. Am J Occup Ther 2008;62:625–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baum C, Edwards D. Activity card sort. St. Louis (MO): Washington University; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Morgan G, Gliner J, Harmon R. Understanding and evaluating research in applied and clinical settings. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Scientific Software Development GmbH. ATLAS.ti. 6.2. Berlin, Germany; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Denzin N, Lincoln Y. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 1994. 656 p
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park (CA): SAGE Publications, Inc.; 1990. 378 p
   Google Scholar
• Bailey D, Jackson J. Qualitative data analysis: challenges and dilemmas related to theory and method. Am J Occup Ther 2003;57:57–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell J. Quality inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Hartman-Maeir A, Soroker N, Ring H, et al. Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:559–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouffioulx E, Arnould C, Thonnard J-L. Satisfaction with activity and participation and its relationshipswtih body functions, activities, or environmental factors in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:1404–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M. Finding flow: the psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York (NY): BasicBooks; 1997. ix, 181 p
   Google Scholar
• Emerson H. Flow and occupation: a review of the literature. Can J Occup Ther 1998;65:37–44
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura J, Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow theory and research. In: Snyder C, Lopez S, eds. Oxford handbook of positive psychology. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2009:195–206
   Google Scholar
• Ryan R, Deci E. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 2000;55:68–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson A, Park M, Tham K. Belonging: a qualitative longitudinal study of what matters for persons after stroke during one year of rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 2010;42:831–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch E, Butt Z, Heinernann A, et al. A qualitative study of quality of life after stroke: the importance of social relationships. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:518–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfenden B, Grace M. Returning to work after stroke: a review. Int J Rehabil Res 2009;32:93–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell K. Dimensions of meaning in the occupations of daily life. Can J Occup Ther 2004;71:296–305
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flinn N, Stube J. Post-stroke fatigue: qualitative study of three focus groups. Occup Ther Int 2010;17:81–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White J, Gray K, Magin P, et al. Exploring the experience of post-stroke fatigue in community dwelling stroke survivors: a prospective qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:1376–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson J, Wiles R, Ellis-Hill C, et al. Resuming previously valued activities post-stroke: who or what helps? Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1555–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson L, McLaughlin K. An exploration of clients' goals during inpatient and outpatient stroke rehabilitation. Int J Ther Rehabil 2009;16:324–30
   Google Scholar
• Dubouloz CJ, King J, Paterson B, et al. A model of the process of transformation in primary care for people living with chronic illnesses. Chronic Illn 2010;6:282–93
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rochette A, Tribble DS, Desrosiers J, et al. Adaptation and coping following a first stroke: a qualitative analysis of a phenomenological orientation. Int J Rehabil Res 2006;29:247–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochette A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levasseur M. ‘Optimal' participation: a reflective look. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1231–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar