The Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation into Turkish assessing its psychometric properties

References

• Lelis CM, Battaus MRB, Freitas FCTd, et al. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in nursing professionals: an integrative literature review. Acta Paul Enferm. 2012;25:477–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munabi IG, Buwembo W, Kitara DL, et al. Musculoskeletal disorder risk factors among nursing professionals in low resource settings: a cross-sectional study in Uganda. BMC Nurs. 2014;13:7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karahan A, Kav S, Abbasoglu A, et al. Low back pain: prevalence and associated risk factors among hospital staff. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65:516–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrdad R, Dennerlein JT, Haghighat M, et al. Association between psychosocial factors and musculoskeletal symptoms among Iranian nurses. Am J Ind Med. 2010;53:1032–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Barros E, Alexandre NMC. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire. Int Nurs Rev. 2003;50:101–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, et al. Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon. 1987;18:233–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson C, Campion K, Foster A, et al. Questionnaire development: an examination of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire. Appl Ergon. 1992;23:197–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesquita CC, Ribeiro JC, Moreira P. Portuguese version of the standardized Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire: cross cultural and reliability. J Public Health (Oxf). 2010;18:461–466.
   Google Scholar
• Knottnerus JA, Buntinx F. The evidence base of clinical diagnosis: theory and methods of diagnostic research. Oxford: Wiley; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattray J, Jones MC. Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16:234–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popham WJ. Criterion-referenced assessment. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Ramada JM, Serra C, Amick III BC, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire to Spanish spoken in Spain. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23:566–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler AH, Goolkasian P, Baird AC, et al. Development of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Item analysis, face, and criterion-related validity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24:1290–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicer A, Yazici A, Camdeviren H, et al. Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain: reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the neck pain and disability scale. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:959–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH. Am J Ind Med. 1996;29:602–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogan SK, Ay S, Evcik D, et al. Adaptation of Turkish version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30:185–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintken PE, Glynn P, Cleland JA. Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18:920–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1038–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:2940–2953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakut E, Düger T, Öksüz Ç, et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29:581–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy N. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically-important patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Rheumatol. 1988;1:95–108.
   Google Scholar
• Tüzün E, Eker L, Aytar A, et al. Acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2005;13:28–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB. Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:423–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:S15–S20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Li S, Zhang Y, et al. Test–retest reliability of Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire in nurses. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2013;31:753–758.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Antonopoulou M, Ekdahl C, Sgantzos M, et al. Translation and standardisation into Greek of the standardised general Nordic Questionnaire for the musculoskeletal symptoms. Eur J Gen Pract. 2004;10:33–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortina JM. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78:98–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar