452
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Patients’ perspective on surgical intervention for Dupuytren’s disease – experiences, expectations and appraisal of results

, &
Pages 2538-2549 | Received 18 Jun 2015, Accepted 30 Dec 2015, Published online: 15 Feb 2016

References

  • Thurston AJ. Dupuytren’s disease. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;4:469–477.
  • Pratt A, Byrne G. The lived experience of Dupuytren’s disease of the hand. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18:1793–1802.
  • Wilburn J, McKenna S, Perry-Hinsley D, et al. The impact of dupuytren disease on patient activity and quality of life. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;6:1209–1214.
  • Rodrigues J, Zhang W, Scammell B, et al. What patients want from the treatment of Dupuytren’s disease – is the Unite Rhumatologique des Affections de la Main (URAM) scale relevant? J Hand Surg Eur 2014;6:673–675.
  • Engstrand C, Boren L, Liedberg G. Evaluation of activity limitation and digital extension in Dupuytren’s contracture three months after fasciectomy and hand therapy interventions. J Hand Ther. 2009;22:21–26.
  • Lanting R, Broekstra D, Werker P, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of Dupuytren disease in the general population of Western countries. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;3:593–603.
  • Hindocha S, McGrouther D, Bayat A. Epidemiological evaluation of Dupuytren’s disease incidence and prevalence rates in relation to etiology. Hand (N Y). 2009;3: 256–269.
  • Gudmundsson K, Arngrimsson R, Sigfusson N, et al. Epidemiology of Dupuytren’s disease. Clinical, serological and social assessment. The Reykjavik study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:291–296.
  • Dahlin L, Bainbridge C, Leclercq C, et al. Dupuytren’s disease presentation, referral pathways and resource utilisation in Europe: regional analysis of a surgeon survey and patient chart review. Int J Clini Pract. 2013;3: 261–270.
  • Dahlin L, Bainbridge C, Szczypa P, et al. Current trends in the surgical management of Dupuytren’s disease in Europe: the surgeon’s perspective. Eur J Orthop Traumatol. 2012;1:25–30.
  • Cott CA. Client-centred rehabilitation: client perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;24:1411–1422.
  • MacLeod R, McPherson KM. Care and compassion: part of person-centred rehabilitation, inappropriate response or a forgotten art? Disabil Rehabil. 2007;2021:1589–1595.
  • Leplege A, Gzil F, Cammelli M, et al. Person-centredness: conceptual and historical perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;2021:1555–1565.
  • Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;12:1743–1748.
  • Becker G, Davis T. The outcome of surgical treatments for primary Dupuytren’s disease – a systematic review. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2010;8:623–626.
  • Chen N, Srinivasan R, Shauver M, et al. A systematic review of outcomes of fasciotomy, aponeurotomy, and collagenase treatments for Dupuytren’s contracture. Hand (N Y). 2011;3:250–255.
  • Ball C, Pratt A, Nanchahal J. Optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for Dupuytren’s disease: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:131.
  • Thoma A, Kaur M, Ignacy T, et al. Health related quality of life in patients undergoing palmar fasciectomy for Dupuytren’s disease. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;9:166–174.
  • Engstrand C, Krevers B, Nylander G, et al. Hand function and quality of life before and after fasciectomy for Dupuytren disease. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;7:1333–1343.
  • Beaudreuil J, Lermusiaux J, Teyssedou J, et al. Multi-needle aponeurotomy for advanced Dupuytren’s disease: preliminary results of safety and efficacy (MNA 1 study). Joint Bone Spine. 2011;6:625–628.
  • Toppi J, Trompf L, Smoll N, et al. Dupuytren’s contracture: an analysis of outcomes of percutaneous needle fasciotomy versus open fasciectomy. ANZ J Surg. 2015;85:639–643.
  • Vollbach F, Walle L, Fansa H. [Dupuytren’s disease – patient satisfaction and functional results one year after partial fasciectomy and injection of collagenase]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2013;5:258–264.
  • Degreef I, Tejpar S, De Smet L. Improved postoperative outcome of segmental fasciectomy in Dupuytren disease by insertion of an absorbable cellulose implant. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2011;3:157–164.
  • Roush T, Stern P. Results following surgery for recurrent Dupuytren’s disease. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25:291–296.
  • Cheng H, Hung L, Tse W, et al. Needle aponeurotomy for Dupuytren’s contracture. J Orthop Surg. 2008;1:88–90.
  • Hudak P, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C, et al. Testing a new theory of patient satisfaction with treatment outcome. Med Care. 2004;8:726–739.
  • Hudak P, McKeever P, Wright J. Understanding the meaning of satisfaction with treatment outcome. Med Care. 2004;8:718–725.
  • Rademakers J, Delnoij D, de Boer D. Structure, process or outcome: which contributes most to patients’ overall assessment of healthcare quality? BMJ Qual Saf Health Care. 2011;20:326–331.
  • Kadzielski J, Malhotra L, Zurakowski D, et al. Evaluation of preoperative expectations and patient satisfaction after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg. 2008;10:1783–1788.
  • Marks M, Herren D, Vliet Vlieland T, et al. Determinants of patient satisfaction after orthopedic interventions to the hand: a review of the literature. J Hand Ther. 2011;4:303–312.e10; quiz 312.
  • Otani K, Kim BJ, Waterman B, et al. Patient satisfaction and organizational impact: a hierarchical linear modeling approach. Health Mark Q. 2012;3:256–269.
  • Otani K, Waterman B, Dunagan WC. Patient satisfaction: how patient health conditions influence their satisfaction. J Healthc Manag. 2012;4:276–292; discussion 292-3.
  • Otani K, Waterman B, Faulkner KM, et al. Patient satisfaction: focusing on “excellent”. J Healthc Manag. 2009;2: 93–102; discussion 102-3.
  • Krevers B, Närvänen AL, Öberg B. Patient evaluation of the care and rehabilitation process in geriatric hospital care. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;9:482–491.
  • Krippendorff K. Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2013.
  • Patton M. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2002.
  • Zywiel MG, Mahomed A, Gandhi R, et al. Measuring expectations in orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;11:3446–3456.
  • Waljee J, McGlinn EP, Sears ED, et al. Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery. 2014;5:799–808.
  • Conner-Spady B, Sanmartin C, Johnston G, et al. The importance of patient expectations as a determinant of satisfaction with waiting times for hip and knee replacement surgery. Health Policy. 2011;3:245–252.
  • Haanstra TM, Hanson L, Evans R, et al. How do low back pain patients conceptualize their expectations regarding treatment? Content analysis of interviews. Eur Spine J. 2013;9:1986–1995.
  • Pomey MP, Ghadiri DP, Karazivan P, et al. Patients as partners: a qualitative study of patients’ engagement in their health care. PLoS One. 2015;4:e0122499. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122499.
  • Gruber JS, Hageman M, Neuhaus V, et al. Patient activation and disability in upper extremity illness. J Hand Surg. 2014;7:1378–1383.e3.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.