Research-based evidence in stroke rehabilitation: an investigation of its implementation by physiotherapists and occupational therapists

References

• Hoffmann T, Bennett S, Del Mar C. Evidence‐based practice across the health professions. Sydney: Elsevier; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Scurlock-Evans L, Upton P, Upton D. Evidence-based practice in physiotherapy: a systematic review of barriers, enablers and interventions. Physiotherapy. 2014;100:208–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upton D, Stephens D, Williams B, et al. Occupational therapists’ attitudes, knowledge, and implementation of evidence-based practice: a systematic review of published research. Br J Occup Ther. 2014;77:24–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding KE, Porter J, Horne-Thompson A, et al. Not enough time or a low priority? Barriers to evidence-based practice for allied health clinicians. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2014;34:227–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham F, Robertson L, Anderson J. New Zealand occupational therapists’ views on evidence-based practice: a replicated survey of attitudes, confidence and behaviours. Aust Occup Ther J. 2013;60:120–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377:1693–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish Board of Health. Brain injury rehabilitation – a health technology assessment. Copenhagen: Danish Board of Health; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Board of Health. Forløbsprogram for rehabilitering af voksne med erhvervet hjerneskade: - apopleksi og transitorisk crebral iskæmi (TCI): – traume, infektion, tumor, subarachnoidalblødning og encephalopati. [Rehabilitation programme for adults with acquired brain injury: – stroke or transient cerebral ischemia (TCI): – trauma, infection, tumour, subarachnoid haemorrhage, and encephalopathy.] Version 1.0. Copenhagen: Danish Board of Health; 2011 (in Danish).
   Google Scholar
• Danish Board of Health, National klinisk retningslinje for fysioterapi og ergoterapi til voksne med nedsat funktionsevne som følge af erhvervet hjerneskade, herunder apopleksi [National clinical guideline for physiotherapy and occupational therapy for adults with disabilities as a result of brain damage, including stroke]. Copenhagen: Danish Board of Health; 2014 (in Danish).
   Google Scholar
• The International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health. World Health Organization; 2001 [cited 2014 Aug 11]. Available from http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Dworzynski K, Ritchie G, Fenu E, et al. Rehabilitation after stroke: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2013;346:f3615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Stroke rehabilitation: long-term rehabilitation after stroke. Clin Guideline. 2013;162.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay MP, Gubitz G, Bayley M, et al. Canadian best practice recommendations for stroke care (update 2010). On behalf of the Canadian stroke strategy best practices and standards writing group. Ottawa: Canadian Stroke Network; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Zidarov D, Thomas A, Poissant L. Knowledge translation in physical therapy: from theory to practice. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1571–1577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnellan C, Sweetmana S, Shelley E. Health professionals’ adherence to stroke clinical guidelines: a review of the literature. Health Policy. 2013;111:245–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrish K, Lacey A. The research process in nursing. 6th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Barber M, Fail M, Shields M, et al. Validity and reliability of estimating the Scandinavian Stroke Scale Score from medical records. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;17:224–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasner SE. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:603–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15:398–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62:107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24:105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Checklist vers 2.1a. Geneva: WHO; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Qaseem A, Forland F, Macbeth F, et al. Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:525–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehabilitation Forum Denmark, MarselisborgCenteret. Hvidbog om rehabiliteringsbegrebet. Rehabilitering i Danmark [White book about rehabilitation – rehabilitation in Denmark]. Aarhus: MarselisborgCenteret; 2004 (in Danish).
   Google Scholar
• Momsen AM, Rasmussen JO, Nielsen CV, et al. Multidisciplinary team care in rehabilitation: an overview of reviews. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44:901–912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;Oct 17(4):CD000197.
   Google Scholar
• Levack WM, Dean SG, Siegert RJ, et al. Navigating patient-centered goal setting in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: how clinicians control the process to meet perceived professional responsibilities. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85:206–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solli HM, Da Silva AB. The Holistic Claims of the Biopsychosocial Conception of WHO’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF): a conceptual analysis on the basis of a pluralistic-holistic ontology and multidimensional view of the human being. J Med Philos. 2012;37:277–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staplton T, McBrearty C. Use of standardised assessments and outcome measures among a sample of Irish occupational therapists working with adults with physical disabilities. Br J Occup Ther. 2009;72:55–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan EA, Murray J. The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:96. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedge FM, Braswell-Christy J, Brown CJ, et al. Factors influencing the use of outcome measures in physical therapy practice. Physiother Theory Pract. 2012;28:119–133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pedersen TJ, Kristensen HK. “It has to make sense.” A critical discourse analysis of the attitudes of occupational therapists and physiotherapists towards the systematic use of standardized outcome measurement. Disabil Rehabil. 2015. DOI:10.3109/09638288.2015.1107630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen HK, Borg T, Hounsgaard L. Aspects affecting occupational therapists’ reasoning when implementing research-based evidence in stroke rehabilitation. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19:118–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar