Identifying drug risk perceptions in Danish youths: Ranking exercises in focus groups

References

• Andersson B, Miller P, Beck F, Chomynova P. The prevalences of and perceived risks from drug use among teenagers in 33 European countries. Journal of Substance Use 2009; 14(3–4)189–196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachman JG, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM. Explaining recent increases in students’ marijuana use: Impacts of perceived risks and disapproval, 1979 through 1996. American Journal of Public Health 1998; 88(6)887–892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour R. Doing focus groups. Sage, London 2007
   Google Scholar
• Cohn LD, Macfarlane S, Yanez C. Risk-perception: Differences between adolescents and adults. Health Psychology 1995; 14(3)217–222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demant J. Focus groups as social experiments. Liquid socialities: Approaches to youths’ alcohol experiences, J Demant. Department of Sociology, Copenhagen 2008; 157–184
   Google Scholar
• Douglas M. Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. Routledge, London 1992
   Google Scholar
• Duff C. The pleasure in context. International Journal of Drug Policy 2008; 19: 384–392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dundes L. DanceSafe and ecstasy: Protection or promotion?. Journal of Health & Social Policy 2003; 17(1)19–37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EMCDDA (2007). 2007 Annual report: The state of the drugs problem in Europe. Lisbon
   Google Scholar
• Elekes Z, Miller P, Chomynova P, Beck F. Changes in perceived risk of different substances use by ranking order of drug attitudes in different ESPAD-countries. Journal of Substance Use 2009; 14(3–4)197–210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The Universities. Discourse & Society 1993; 4: 133–168
   Google Scholar
• Gerrard M, Gibbons FX, Vande Lune LS, Pexa NA, Gano ML. Adolescents’ substance-related risk perceptions: Antecedents, mediators and consequences. Risk Decision and Policy 2002; 7(2)175–191
   Google Scholar
• Golub A, Johnson B, Dunlap E. Subcultural evolution and illicit drug use. Addiction Research & Theory 2005; 13(3)217–229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampson SE, Severson HH, Burns WJ, Slovic P, Fisher KJ. Risk perception, personality factors and alcohol use among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences 2001; 30(1)167–181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibell B, Andersson B, Bjarnason T, Ahlström S, Balakireva O, Kokkevi A, et al. The ESPAD report 2003. Alcohol and other drug use among students in 35 European countries. CAN & The Pompidou Group at the Council of Europe, Stockholm 2004
   Google Scholar
• Hibell B, Guttormsson U, Ahlström S, Balakireva O, Bjarnason T, Kokkevi A, Kraus L. The 2007 ESPAD report. Substance use among students in 35 European countries. CAN, EMCDDA & Pompidou Group, Stockholm 2009
   Google Scholar
• Hunt J, Evans K. ‘The great unmentionable’: Exploring the pleasures and benefits of ecstasy from the perspectives of drug users. Drugs: Education, prevention and policy 2008; 15(4)329–349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt G, Evans K, Kares F. Drug use and the meanings of risk and pleasure. Journal of Youth Studies 2007; 10(1)73–96
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen M, Room R. Youth drinking cultures. European experiences. Ashgate, Aldershot 2007
   Google Scholar
• Korf DJ, Nabben T, Benschop A. Antenne 2003. Trends in alcohol, tabak en drugs bij jonge Amsterdammers. With English summary. Rozenberg Publishers, Amsterdam 2003
   Google Scholar
• Laclau E, Mouffe C. Hegemony & socialist strategy. Towards a radical democratic politics. Verso, London 1985
   Google Scholar
• Lupton D. Risk. Routledge, Abingdon 1999
   Google Scholar
• MacLean S, (2005). “It might be a scummy-arsed drug but it's a sick buzz”: Chroming and pleasure. Contemporary Drug Problems, 32(Summer), 295–318
   Google Scholar
• Measham F, Brain K. ‘Binge’ drinking, British alcohol policy and the new culture of intoxication. Crime, Media, Culture 2005; 1(3)262–283
   Google Scholar
• Measham F, Newcombe R, Parker H. The normalization of recreational drug use amongst young people in Nortg-West England. The British Journal of Sociology 1994; 45(2)287–312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Measham F, Shiner M. The legacy of ‘normalisation’: The role of classical and contemporary criminological theory in understanding young people's drug use. International Journal of Drug Policy, In press
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan M, Hibell B, Andersson B, Bjarnason T, Kokkevi A, Narusk A. The ESPAD study: Implications for prevention. Drugs: education, prevention and policy 1999; 6(2)243–256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mounteney J, Leirvåg S-E. Providing an earlier warning of emerging drug trends: The føre var system. Drugs: Education, prevention and policy 2004; 6: 449–471
   Google Scholar
• Parker H, Aldridge J, Measham F, Haynes P. Illigal leisure. The normalization of adolescent recreational drug use. Routledge, London 1998
   Google Scholar
• Parker H, Williams L, Aldridge J. The normalization of “sensible” recreational drug use: Further evidence from the North West England longitudinal study. Sociology 2002; 36(4)941–964
   Google Scholar
• Pearson G. Normal drug use: Ethnographic fieldwork among adult network of redreational drug users in inner London. Substance Use & Misuse 2001; 36(1&2)167–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilkington H. In good company: Risk, security and choice in young people's drug decisions. The Sociological Review 2007; 55(2)373–392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pösö T, Honkatukia P, Nyqvist L. Focus groups and the study of violence. Qualitative Research 2008; 8(1)73–89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiner M, Newburn T. Definitely, maybe not? The normalisation of recreational drug use amongst young people. Sociology 1997; 31(3)511–529
   Google Scholar
• Topp L, Breen C, Kaye S, Darke S. Adapting the illicit drug reporting system (IDRS) to examine the feasibility of monitoring trends in the markets for ‘party drugs’. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2004; 73: 189–197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulloch J, Lupton D. Risk and everyday life. Sage, London 2008
   Google Scholar
• Vervaeke HKE, Korf DJ. Ecstasy: Motives for use and non-use. Research on Drugs and Drug Policy from a European Perspective. Selected readings from the 15th International Conference of the European Society for Social Drug Research (ESSD), L Kraus, DJ Korf. Pabst, LengerichGermany 2005; 78–91
   Google Scholar
• Warr DJ. “It was fun … but we don't usually talk about these things”. Analyzing sociable interactions in focus groups. Qualitative Inquiry 2005; 11(2)200–225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstock AR, Griffiths P, Stewart D. Drugs and the dance music scene: A survey of current drug use patterns among a sample of dance music enthusiasts in the UK. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2001; 64: 9–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar