Communicating the principle of ‘treatment instead of punishment’ in Hungary on the basis of an examination of the patients at a drug outpatient clinic

References

• Alterman AI, Brown LS, Zaballero A, McKay JR. Interviewer severity ratings and composite scores of the ASI: A further look. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1994; 34: 201–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argeriou M, McCarty D, Mulvey K, Daley M. Use of the Addiction Severity Index with homeless substance abusers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 1994; 11: 359–365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers J. Contraindicated drug courts. UCLA Law Review 2008; 55: 783–825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciola JS. The Addiction Severity Index in clinical efficacy trials of medications for cocaine dependence. NIDA Research Monograph 1997; 175: 182–191
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chawarski MC, Mazlan M, Schottenfeld RS. Heroin dependence and HIV infection in Malaysia. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2006; 82(Suppl. 1)S39–S42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad P. The shifting engines of medicalization. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 2005; 46: 3–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper CS. Drug courts: Current issues and future perspectives. Substance Use and Misuse 2003; 38(11–13)1671–1711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draine J, Blank A, Kottsieper P, Solomon P. Contrasting jail diversion and in-jail services for mental illness and substance abuse: Do they serve the same clients?. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 2005; 23(2)171–181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elekes, Zs., Nagy, Z., Nyírády, A., & Porkoláb L. (2006). Problémás drogfogyasztás [Problem drug use]. In Jelentés a magyarországi kábítószer-helyzetről, 2006 [Annual report on the drug situation in Hungary 2006 for the EMCDDA] (pp. 28–39). Budapest: National Drug Focus Point
   Google Scholar
• European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) (2008). European Legal Database on Drugs. Retrieved from http://eldd.emcdda.europa.eu/
   Google Scholar
• Evans E, Hser LLY. Client and program factors associated with dropout from court mandated drug treatment. Evaluation and Program Planning 2009; 32: 204–212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felvinczi, K., Nyírády, A., & Portörő, P. (2007). Jelentés a magyarországi kábítószerhelyzetről [Annual report on the drug situation in Hungary]. Budapest: Ministry for Social and Employment Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher B, Rehm J, Uchtenhagen A, Kirst M. Compulsory treatment: What do we know and where should we go?. European Addiction Research 2002; 8: 52–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman K. Health and well-being outcomes for drug-dependent offenders on the NSW Drug Court programme. Drug Alcohol Review 2003; 22(4)409–416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furedi F. The end of professional dominance. Society 2006; 43(6)14–18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerevich J, Bácskai E, Kó J, Rózsa S. Az Addikció Súlyossági Index (ASI) magyarországi reliabilitás és validitás vizsgálata [Reliability and validity study of the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) in Hungary]. Psychiatria Hungarica 2001; 16(3)292–307
   Google Scholar
• Gerevich J, Bácskai E, Kó J, Rózsa S. Reliability and validity study of the Hungarian version of the European addiction severity index (ASI). Results of a multi-focal research project. Psychopathology 2005; 38: 301–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison LD, Scarpitti FR. Introduction: Progress and issues in drug treatment court. Substance Use and Misuse 2002; 37(12–13)1441–1467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgins DC, El-Guebaly N. More data on the Addiction Severity Index: Reliability and validity with the mentally ill substance abuser. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1992; 180: 197–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joint Decree No. 26/2003 (V. 16.) ESZCSM-GYISM, modified by decree No. 55/2003 SZCSM (IX.4.), Magyar Közlöny, 2003. 103. 7895, modified by Joint Decree No. 42/2008. (XI. 14.) EüM-SZMM, Szociális Közlöny, 6,11, 1083–1087
   Google Scholar
• Joyner LM, Wright JD, Devine JA. Reliability and validity of the Addiction Severity Index among homeless substance misusers. Substance Use and Misuse 1996; 31: 729–751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminer Y, Frances RJ. Inpatient treatment of adolescents with psychiatric and substance abuse disorders. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1991; 42: 894–896
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly JF, Finney JW, Moos R. Substance use disorder patients who are mandated to treatment: Characteristics, treatment process, and 1- and 5-year outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2005; 28: 213–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokkevi A, Hartgers C. EuropASI: European adaptation of a multidimensional assessment instrument for drug and alcohol dependence. European Addiction Research 1995; 1: 208–210
   Google Scholar
• Krebs CP, Lindquist CH, Koetse W, Lattimore PK. Assessing the long-term impact of drug court participation on recidivism with generalized estimating equations. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2007; 91(1)57–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leukefeld CG, Logan TK, Martin SS, Purvis RT, Farabee D. A health services use framework for drug-abusing offenders. American Behavioral Scientist 1998; 41(8)1123–1135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lévay M. Büntetés helyett kezelés: Racionális és szükségszerű kompromisszum a kábítószer-problémával kapcsolatos kriminálpolitikában; Az elv érvényesülése a rendszerváltozás utáni magyar büntetőjogban [Treatment instead of punishment: A rational and reasonable compromise in criminal policy concerning drug problem; getting across of the principle in Hungarian criminal law after the system change]. Addiktológia (Addictologia Hungarica) 2006; 5(4)342–358
   Google Scholar
• Marinelli-Casey P, Gonzales R, Hillhouse M, Ang A, Zweben J, Cohen J, , Rawson RA, et al. Methamphetamine treatment project corporate authors. Drug court treatment for methamphetamine dependence: Treatment response and posttreatment outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2008; 34(2)242–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlowe DB. Judicial supervision of drug-abusing offenders. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 2006; 323(SARC Suppl. 3)323–331
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe DM, Festinger DS, Dugosh KL, Lee PA. Are judicial status hearings a “key component” of drug court? Six and twelve months outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2005; 79: 145–155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBride DC, Terry-McElrath Y, Harwood H, Inciardi JA, Leukefeld C. Reflections on drug policy. Journal of Drug Issues 2009; 39(1)71–88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGahan, P., Griffith, J., McLellan, A.T. (1984). Composite scores from the Addiction Severity Index: Manual and computer software. PVAMC, Philadelphia, PA 19104: Veterans Administration Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLellan AT, Kushner H, Metzger D, Peters R, Smith I, Grissom G, , Argeriou M, et al. The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 1992; 9: 199–213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Woody GE, O’Brien CP. An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: The Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases 1980; 168: 26–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzl JM, Herzig RM. Medicalisation in the 21st century: Introduction. Lancet 2007; 369(9562)697–698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Drug Focal Point (2008). National report to the EMCDDA. Budapest: National Drug Focal Point (REITOX)
   Google Scholar
• National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) (2006). Principles of drug abuse treatment for criminal justice populations A research-based guide NIH Publication No. 06-5316
   Google Scholar
• Perry, A., Coulton, S., Glanville, J., Godfrey, C., Lunn, J., McDougall, C., & Neale, Z. (2006). Interventions for drug-using offenders in the courts, secure establishments and the community. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3. Art. No. CD005193. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005193.pub2.
   Google Scholar
• Pszichiátriai Szakmai Kollégium [Psychiatric Professional College]. A drogambulanciák minimális szakmai feltételrendszere [Minimum professional conditions for drug outpatient units. Position paper of the College of Psychiatry]. Psychiatry Hungarica 1998; 1: 103–105
   Google Scholar
• Rácz J, Pogány Cs, Máthé-Árvay N. Az EuropASI (Addikció Súlyossági Index) magyar nyelvű változatának reliabilitás- és validitásvizsgálata [Reliability and validity study of the Hungarian version of EuroASI Addiction Severity Index]. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle 2002; 57(4)587–603
   Google Scholar
• Roll JM, Prendergast M, Richardson K, Burdon W, Ramirez A. Identifying predictors of treatment outcome in a drug court program. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 2005; 31(4)641–656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose N. Beyond medicalisation. Lancet 2007; 369(9562)700–702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rounsaville BJ, Anton SF, Carroll KM, Budde D, Prusoff BA, Gavin FI. Psychiatric diagnosis of treatment seeking cocaine abusers. Archives of General Psychiatry 1991; 45: 43–51
   Google Scholar
• Soulet, MH., Oeuvray, K., Uchtenhagen, A., Schaaf, S., Bock, I., Frick, U., …, Bolliger, H. (2006). QCT Europe: Final report: Constructing, producing and analysing the qualitative evidence + Final report on quantitative evaluation. QCT-Europe Project. Freiburg/Zurich: Research Institute for Public Health and Addiction, Zurich University.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens A, Berto D, Frick U, Hunt N, Kerschl V, McSweeney T, , Werdenich W, et al. The relationship between legal status, perceived pressure and motivation in treatment for drug dependence: Results from a European study of quasi-compulsory treatment. European Addiction Research 2006; 12: 197–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, A., Berto, D., Heckmann, W., Kerschl, V., Oeuvray, K., Ooyen, M., …, Uchtenhagen, A. (2005). Quasi-compulsory treatment of drug dependent offenders: An international literature review. Substance Use and Misuse, 40, 269–283.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, A, Berto, D., Kerschl, V., Oeuvray, K., van Ooyen, M., Steffan, E., …, Uchtenhagen, A. (2003). QCT Europe: Summary literature review: The international literature on drugs, crime and treatment. Canterbury, UK: European Institute of Social Services, University of Kent, Kent, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Turner S, Longshore D, Wenzel S, Deschenes E, Greenwood P, Fain T, , McBride D, et al. A decade of drug treatment court research. Substance Use and Misuse 2002; 37(12–13)1489–1527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitrai J., Busa Cs., Füzesi Zs., Kesztyüs M., Szilágyi J., & Tistyán, L. (2009). Tanulmány az „elterelés” hatásosságának vizsgálata című kutatás eredményeiről [Study on results of research on „diversion” effectivity]. Egészségmonitor, Budapest. Unpublished manuscript
   Google Scholar
• Wiese PR. Efficacy of addiction treatment in a correctional setting for female offenders as measured by the Addiction Severity Index. Dissertation Abstracts International 1995; 55(9-B)4136
   Google Scholar
• Wild TC, Newton-Taylor B, Ogborne AC, Mann R, Erickson P, MacDonald S. Attitudes toward compulsory substance abuse treatment: A comparison of the public, counselors, probationers and judges’ views. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 2001; 8(1)33–45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild TC, Roberts AB, Cooper EL. Compulsory substance abuse treatment: An overview of recent findings and issues. European Addiction Research 2002; 8: 84–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar