“You’re all going to hate the word ‘recovery’ by the end of this”: Service users’ views of measuring addiction recovery

References

• ACMD. (2013). What recovery outcomes does the evidence tell us we can expect? Second report of the Recovery Committee. London: Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs
   Google Scholar
• AIVL (Australian Injecting and Illicit Drug Users’ League). (2008). Treatment service users project: Final report. Canberra: AIVL
   Google Scholar
• Alakeson, V. (2007). Putting service users in control: The case for extending self-direction into the NHS. London: Social Market Foundation
   Google Scholar
• Burns, S., & MacKeith, J. (2012). Drug and alcohol star. Brighton: Triangle Consulting Social Enterprise Limited
   Google Scholar
• Carr, S. (2010). Personalisation: A rough guide (revised 2nd ed.). London: Social Care Institute for Excellence
   Google Scholar
• Cloud, W., & Granfield, R. (2001). Natural recovery from substance dependency: Lessons for treatment providers. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 1, 83–104
   Google Scholar
• Cloud, W., & Granfield, R. (2008). Conceptualizing recovery capital: Expansion of a theoretical construct. Substance Use and Misuse, 43, 1971–1986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. (2009). Measuring health status. In Neale, J. (Ed.), Research methods for health and social care (pp. 181–194). London: Palgrave
   Google Scholar
• Duke, K., Herring, R., Thickett, A., & Thom, B. (2013). Substitution treatment in the era of ‘recovery’: An analysis of stakeholder roles and policy windows in Britain. Substance Use and Misuse, 48, 966–976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, A. M. (1990). The outcomes movement – Will it get us where we want to go? New England Journal of Medicine, 323, 266–270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erens, B., Roland, M., & Knapp, M. (2011). Payment by Results (PbR) Drug & Alcohol Recovery Pilot Programme: A note of advice to the Department of Health (DH) on the proposed evaluation. London: Policy Research Unit in Policy Innovation Research. Retrieved May 9th, 2014, Policy Research Unit in Policy Innovation Research. Website: http://www.piru.ac.uk/assets/files/Drugs%20Recovery%20PbR%20Note%20of%20Advice.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., Rose, D., Flach, C., Csipke, E., Glossop, H., McCrone, P. … Wykes, T. (2012). VOICE: Developing a new measure of service users' perceptions of inpatient care, using a participatory methodology. Journal of Mental Health, 21, 57–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, J., Jenkins, N., Bloor, M., Neale, J., & Berney, L. (2007). Drug user involvement in treatment decisions. New York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, D., & Foster, J. (2005). Fumbling in the dark. Druglink, May/June, 12
   Google Scholar
• Garratt, A., Schmidt, L., Mackintosh, A., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2002). Quality of life measurement: Bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. British Medical Journal, 324, 1417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granfield, R., & Cloud, W. (1999). Coming clean: Overcoming addiction without treatment. New York: New York University Press
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2010). Drug strategy 2010: ‘Reducing demand, restricting supply, building recovery: Supporting people to live drug free life’. London: HM Government
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, M., Brener, L., Frankland, A., & Treloar, C. (2010). Assessing community support for harm reduction services: Comparing two measures. Drug and Alcohol Review, 29, 385–391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkinson, C. (1994). Measuring health and medical outcomes: An overview. In Jenkinson, C. (Ed.), Measuring health and medical outcomes (pp. 1–6). London: UCL Press
   Google Scholar
• Laudet, A.B. (2007). What does recovery mean to you? Lessons from the recovery experience for research and practice. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33, 243–256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, J., Farrell, M., Bradbury, C., Dale-Perera, A., Eastwood, B., Roxburgh, M., & Taylor, S. (2008). Development of the treatment outcomes profile. Addiction, 103, 1450–1460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattick, R.P., Digiusto, E., Doran, C., O’Brien, S., Shanahan, M., Kimber, J. … Shakeshaft, A., NEPOD Trial Investigators. (2001). National evaluation of pharmacotherapeis for opioid dependence: Report of results and recommendations. Sydney: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre
   Google Scholar
• National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse. (2010). NTA Business Plan 2010–11. London: National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse
   Google Scholar
• Neale, J., Pickering, L., & Nettleton, S. (2012). The everyday lives of recovering heroin users. London: Royal Society of Arts
   Google Scholar
• Neale, J., Nettleton, S., & Pickering, L. (2014). Gender sameness and difference in recovery from heroin dependence: A qualitative exploration. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25, 3–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, J., Finch, E., Marsden, J., Mitcheson, L., Rose, D., Strang, J. … Wykes, T. (2014). How should we measure addiction recovery? Analysis of service provider perspectives using online Delphi groups. Drugs: Education, prevention and policy. Posted online on May 15, 2014. (doi:10.3109/09687637.2014.918089)
   Google Scholar
• Paylor, I., Measham, F., & Asher, A. (2012). Social work and drug use. Maidenhead: Open University Press
   Google Scholar
• Recovery Orientated Drug Treatment Expert Group. (2012). Medications in recovery: Re-orientating drug dependence treatment. London: National Drug Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse
   Google Scholar
• Renju, J., & Moselhy, H.F. (2005). National survey of methadone prescribing for maintenance treatment: ‘Opiophobia’ among substance misuse services? The Psychiatric Bulletin, 29, 459–461
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Bryman, A., & Burgess, R.G. (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data (pp. 173–194). London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D., Thornicroft, G., & Slade, M. (2006). Who decides what evidence is? Developing a multiple perspectives paradigm in mental health. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia, 113, 109–114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D., Evans, J., Sweeney, A., & Wykes, T. (2011). A model for developing outcome measures from the perspectives of mental health service users. International Review of Psychiatry, 23, 41–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2008). The road to recovery: A new approach to tackling Scotland's drug problem. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, H. (2012). Walk the line. Druglink, July/August, 8–11
   Google Scholar
• Skills for Health. (2009). Scoping for personalization. Retrieved February 24, 2014, from Skills for Health. Website: http://www.skillsforhealth.org.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Streiner, D.L., & Norman, G.R. (1989). Health measurement scales – A practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Treloar, C., & Holt, M. (2006). Deficit models and divergent philosophies: Service providers’ perspectives on barriers and incentives to drug treatment. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 13, 367–382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treloar, C., Newland, J., Rance, J., & Hopwood, M. (2010). Uptake and delivery of hepatitis C treatment in opiate substitution treatment: Perceptions of clients and health professionals. Journal of Viral Hepatitis, 17, 839–844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trivedi, P., & Wykes, T. (2002). From passive subjects to equal partners: Qualitative review of user involvement in research. British Journal of Psychiatry, 181, 468–472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar