Shorter sentences for drug mules: The early impact of the sentencing guidelines in England and Wales

References

• Álvarez Velasco, C. (2014). Reforms and contradictions in Ecuador's drug policy, Memo, August 2014. Washington: Washington Office on Latin America
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth, A., & Roberts, J. (2013). The origins and nature of sentencing guidelines in England and Wales. In Ashworth, A., & Roberts J. (Eds.), Sentencing guidelines: Exploring the English model (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth, A. (2010). Sentencing and criminal justice (5th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, C. (2013). Exploring female motivations for drug smuggling on the island of Barbados: Evidence from her majesty's prison, Barbados. Feminist Criminology, 8, 117–141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckett, K. (1997). Making crime pay: Law and order in contemporary American politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Caulkins, J.P., Burnett, H., & Leslie, E. (2009). How illegal drugs enter an island country: Insights from interviews with interviews with incarcerated traffickers. Global Crime, 10, 66–96
   Google Scholar
• Chesney-Lind, M. (2002). Imprisoning women: The unintended victims of mass imprisonment. In Mauer, M., & Chesney-Lind, M. (Eds.), Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment (pp. 79–94). New York: New Press
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, K. (2013). Seizures of drugs in England and Wales, 2012–2013. London: Home Office
   Google Scholar
• Collins, J. (2014). The economics of a new global strategy. In Collins J. (Ed.), Ending the drug wars. Report of the LSE expert group in the economics of drug policy (pp. 8–17). London: London School of Economics and Political Science
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. (2013). Nothing personal: The impact of personal mitigation at sentencing the Creation of the Council. In Ashworth, A., & Roberts J. (Eds.), Sentencing guidelines: Exploring the English model (pp. 157–164). Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Corva, D. (2008). Neoliberal globalization and the war on drugs: Transnationalizing illiberal governance in the Americas. Political Geography, 27, 176–193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorado, M-C. (2005). Desventajas del castigo penal ‘exclusivo’ a las colombianas, mensajeras de drogas en Europa. In Martín Palomo M.T., Miranda López M.J., & Vega Solís C. (Eds.), Delitos y Fronteras: Mujeres extranjeras en prisión (pp. 301–338). Madrid: Editorial Complutense
   Google Scholar
• Dorn, N., & Murji, K. (1992). Low level drug enforcement. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 20, 159–171
   Google Scholar
• Duke, K. (2006). Out of crime and into treatment? The criminalisation of contemporary drug policy since tackling drugs together. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 13, 409–415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCCDA). (2012). A definition of “drug mules” for use in a European context. Lisbon: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction
   Google Scholar
• Fleetwood, J. (2014). Drug mules: Women in the international cocaine trade. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan
   Google Scholar
• Fleetwood, J. (2011). Five kilos: Penalties and practice in the international cocaine trade. British Journal of Criminology, 51, 375–393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortson, R. (1996). The sentencing of drug couriers. In Green P. (Ed.), Drug couriers: A new perspective (pp. 79–111). London: Quartet
   Google Scholar
• Giacomello, C. (2013). Women, drug offenses and penitentiary systems in Latin America. London: International Drug Policy Consortium
   Google Scholar
• Green, P. (1998). Drugs, trafficking and criminal policy: The scapegoat strategy. Winchester: Waterside Press
   Google Scholar
• H.M. Government. (2013). Serious and organised crime strategy. Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for the Home Department by Command of Her Majesty. London: The Stationary Office
   Google Scholar
• Harper, R.L., Harper, G.C., & Stockdale, J.E. (2000). The role and sentencing of women in drug trafficking crime. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 7, 101–114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, G. (2010). Sentencing for drugs offences in England and Wales, Series on Legislative Reform of Drug policies, no. 5, June. London: International Drug Policy Consortium
   Google Scholar
• Harris, G. (2011a). Conviction by numbers: Threshold quantities for drug policy, Series on Legislative Reform of Drug policies, no. 14, May. London: International Drug Policy Consortium
   Google Scholar
• Harris, G. (2011b). TNI/IDPC – Sentencing Council: Expert Seminar on Proportionality of Sentencing for Drug Offences (May 20, 2011). Retrieved from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2184341
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2002). Updated drug strategy, 2002. London: HMSO
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2010a). Drug strategy 2010: Reducing demand, restricting supply, building recovery: Supporting people to live a drug free life. London: HMSO
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2010b). Summary table 3. Seizures of controlled drugs by drug type, class and amount seized 2012/13 by the UKBA/Border Force. London: Home Office
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2011). Summary Table 3 ‘Seizures of controlled drugs by drug type, class and amount seized 2012/13 by the UKBA/Border Force’. London: Home Office
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2012). Summary Table 3. Seizures of controlled drugs by drug type, class and amount seized 2012/13 by the UKBA/Border Force. London: Home Office
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2013a). Summary Table 1. Number of drug seizures by class, drug type and year, 2003 to 2012/13. London: Home Office
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2013b). Summary Table 3. Seizures of controlled drugs by drug type, class and amount seized 2012/13 by the UKBA/Border Force. London: Home Office
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C., Ritter, A., Cowdery, N., & Phillips, B. (2014). Australian threshold quantities for ‘drug trafficking’: Are they placing drug users at risk of unjustified sanction?. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice (Vol. 467 (March)). Australian Government: Australian Institute for Criminology
   Google Scholar
• Huling, T. (1995). Women drug couriers: Sentencing reform needed for prisoners of war. Criminal Justice, 9, 15–19
   Google Scholar
• Huling, T. (1996). Prisoners of war: Drug couriers in the United States. In Green P. (Ed.), Drug couriers: A new perspective (pp. 46–60). London: Quartet
   Google Scholar
• International Drug Policy Consortium. (2011). Response from IDPC to the Sentencing Council for England and Wales Consultation on the Drug Offences Guideline. London: International Drug Policy Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.druglawreform.info/images/stories/documents/IDPC_SC_Response_20062011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, J., Kirby, A., & Hough, M. (2011). Public attitudes to the sentencing of drug offences. Sentencing Council Research Series 01/11. London: Institute for Criminal Policy Research/Sentencing Council
   Google Scholar
• Lai, G. (2012). Drugs, crime and punishment: Proportionality of sentencing for drug offences, Series on Legislative Reform of Drug Policies Nr. 20. London: International Drug Policy Consortium
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M., & South, N. (2008). Drugs policing, 497–522. In Newburn, T. (Ed.), Handbook of policing. Collumpton, Devon: Willan
   Google Scholar
• Loveless, J. (2012). Court of appeal: When is a courier not a ‘Mule’? Journal of Criminal Law, 76, 1–10
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, E., & Moreton, K. (2011). Drug “mules”: Twelve case studies. London: Sentencing Council
   Google Scholar
• Maslen, H., & Roberts, J. (2013). Remorse and sentencing: An analysis of sentencing guidelines and sentencing practice. In Ashworth, A., & Roberts J. (Eds.), Sentencing guidelines: Exploring the English Model (pp. 122–149). Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Matrix Knowledge Group. (2007). The illicit drug trade in the United Kingdom, Online report 20/07. London: Home Office
   Google Scholar
• Metall, P., & Youngers, C. (Eds.). (2011). Systems overload: Drug laws and prisons in latin America. London/Washington: Transnational Institute/Washington Office on Latin America.
   Google Scholar
• Oliss, P. (1994). Mandatory minimum sentencing: Discretion, the safety valve and the Sentencing guidelines. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 63, 1851–1892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padfield, N. (2013). Exploring the success of sentencing guidelines. In Ashworth, A., & Roberts J. (Eds.), Sentencing guidelines: Exploring the English Model (pp. 31–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Pina-Sanchez, J., & Linacre, R. (2013). Sentence consistency in England and Wales: Evidence from the Crown Court Sentencing Survey. British Journal of Criminology, 53, 1118–1138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prison Reform Trust & Hibiscus/FPWP. (2012). No way out: A briefing paper on foreign national women in prison in England and Wales, January 2012 (pp. 1–16). London.
   Google Scholar
• Raine, J.W., & Dustan, E. (2009). How well do sentencing guidelines work? Equity, proportionality and consistency in the determination of fine levels in the Magistrates' Courts of England and Wales. The Howard Journal, 48(1), 13–36
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, P., & Stevens, A. (2007). An analysis of UK drug policy. London: UK Drug Policy Commission
   Google Scholar
• Roberts J. (2013b). Complying with sentencing guidelines: Latest findings from the Crown Court Sentencing Survey. In Ashworth, A., & Roberts J. (Eds.), Sentencing guidelines: Exploring the English Model (pp. 124–121). Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. (2013a). Sentencing guidelines in England and Wales: Recent developments and emerging issues. Law and Contemporary Problems, 76(1), 1–23
   Google Scholar
• Rolles, S. (2010). An alternative to the war on drugs. British Medical Journal, 341, 3360–6665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddons, T. (2000). Explaining the drug-crime link: Theoretical, policy and research issues. Journal of Social Policy, 29 (1), 95–107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sentencing Council. (2011a). Drugs offences, analysis and research bulletins. London: Sentencing Council
   Google Scholar
• Sentencing Council. (2011b). Drug offences guidelines: Professional consultation, London: Sentencing Council
   Google Scholar
• Sentencing Council. (2012a). Drug offences: Definitive guideline. London: Sentencing Council
   Google Scholar
• Sentencing Council. (2012b). Crown court sentencing survey: Annual publication, 2012. London: Sentencing Council
   Google Scholar
• Sentencing Council. (2012c). Consultation stage resource assessment – Guideline on drugs. London: Sentencing Council
   Google Scholar
• Sentencing Guidelines Council. (2004). Overarching principles: Seriousness. London: Sentencing Guidelines Council
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Z., & Gowlandt, J. (2012). Drug sentencing: What 's the deal? The new sentencing regime for drug offences. The Journal of Criminal Law, 76, 389–398
   Google Scholar
• SOCA. (2007). Annual plan 2007/2008. London: The Stationary Office
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, A. (2007). When two dark figures collide: Evidence and discourse on drug-related crime. Critical Social Policy, 27, 77–99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudbury, J. (2005). “Mules,” “Yardies” and other folk devils: Mapping cross border imprisonment in Britain. In Sudbury J. (Ed.), Global lockdown: Race, gender, and the prison-industrial complex (pp. 167–184). London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs. (2009). Promoting international cooperation in addressing the involvement of women and girls in drug trafficking, especially as couriers (Report on the 52nd Session (14 March 2008 and 11–20 March 2009), Resolution 52/1, Economic and Social Council Official Records, 2009 Supplement No. 8, UN Doc. E/2010/28)
   Google Scholar
• UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs. (2011). Promoting international cooperation in addressing the involvement of women and girls in drug trafficking, especially as couriers (Report of the executive director, UN doc.E/CN7/2011/7)
   Google Scholar
• Youngers, C., & Rosin, E. (Eds.). (2005). Drugs and democracy in Latin America: The impact of U.S. policy. London: Lynne Rienner
   Google Scholar
• Zaitch, D. (2009). Reducción de daños, seguridad y tráfico de drogas ilícitas. Cuadernos de Seguridad, 11/12, 51–80
   Google Scholar