References
- Bryman, A., & Burgess, R.G. (Eds.). (1994). Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge
- Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (Eds.). (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
- Cohen, S. (1979). The punitive city: Notes on the dispersal of social control. Contemporary Crises, 3, 341–363
- Connell, J., & Kubisch, A. (1998). Applying a theory of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: Progress: Prospects, and problems. In Fulbright-Anderson, K., Kubisch, A., & Connell, J., (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives. Vol. 2. Theory, measurement and analysis. Washington, DC:: The Aspen Institute
- Crawford, A. (1997). The local governance of crime. Appeals to community and partnerships. Oxford: Clarendon Press
- Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Harmondsworth: Penguin group
- Garland, D. (1997). ‘Governmentality’ and the problem of crime: Foucault, criminology, sociology. Theoretical Criminology, 1, 173–214
- Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control, crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Hadfield, P. (Ed.). (2009). Nightlife and crime. Social order and governance in international perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Hadfield, P., Lister, S., & Traynor, P. (2009). The orientation and integration of local and national alcohol policy in England and Wales linked to an article named ‘This town is a different town today’ by Hadfield P. (2009). Alcohol insight No. 65. AERC website. Retrieved April 5, 2013 from http://alcoholresearchuk.org/downloads/finalReports/AERC_FinalReport_0065.pdf
- HM Government. (2012). The government's alcohol strategy. London: HMSO
- Home Office. (1999). Alcohol and crime – Taking stock. London: Home Office, Policing and Reducing Crime Unit
- Hudson, B., & Hardy, B. (2002). Chapter 4: What is ‘successful’ partnership and how can it be measured? In Glendinning, C., Powell, M., & Rummery, K. (Eds.). Partnerships, new labour and the governance of welfare. Bristol: Policy Press
- Hunter, D.J., & Perkins, N. (2014). Partnership working in public health. Bristol: Policy Press
- Martin, L.H., Gutman, H., & Hutton, P.H. (Eds.). (1988). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. London: Tavistock
- May, T. (2001). Social research methods, issues, methods and process (3rd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press
- Measham, F. (2006). The new policy mix: Alcohol, harm minimisation, and determined drunkenness in contemporary society. The International Journal of Drug Policy, 17, 258–268
- O’Malley, P. (2009). Responsibilization. In Wakefield, A., & Fleming, J. (Eds.), The SAGE dictionary of policing (pp. 277–279). London: SAGE Publications Ltd
- Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. (3rd ed). London: Sage Publications
- Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Bryman and Burgess (Eds.). Analysing qualitative data. (pp. 173–194). London: Routledge
- Rose, N. (1993). Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism. Economy and Society, 22, 283–299
- Rowe, M., & Devanney, C. (2003). Partnership and the governance of regeneration. Critical Social Policy, 23, 375
- Wakefield, A., & Fleming, J. (2009). The sage dictionary of policing. London: Sage
- Wettenhall, R. (2003). The rhetoric and reality of public–private partnerships. Public Organization Review, 3, 77–107