A brief Addiction Recovery Questionnaire derived from the views of service users and concerned others

References

• ACMD. (2013). What recovery outcome does the evidence tell us we can expect? London: Home Office
   Google Scholar
• Amrhein, P.C., Miller, W.R., Yahne, C.E., Palmer, M., & Fulcher, L. (2003). Client commitment language during motivational interviewing predicts drug use outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 862–878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, D., Rome, A., Hanning, K.A., White, W., Gossop, M., Taylor, A., & Perkins, A. (2010). Research for recovery: A review of the drugs evidence base. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government
   Google Scholar
• Betty Ford Institute. (2007). What is recovery? A working definition from the Betty Ford Institute. The Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33, 221–228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre for Social Justice. (2014). Ambitious for recovery: Tackling drug and alcohol addiction in the UK. London: Centre for Social Justice
   Google Scholar
• Dodge, K., Krantz, B., & Kenny, P. (2010). How can we begin to measure recovery? Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention and Policy, 5, 31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, K., Herring, R., Thickett, A., & Thom, B. (2013). Substitution treatment in the era of “recovery”: An analysis of stakeholder roles and policy windows in Britain. Substance Use and Misuse, 48, 966–976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• el-Guelbay, N. (2012) The meanings of recovery from addiction: Evolution and promises. Journal of Addiction Medicine, 6, 1–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhurst, C.M., Böhnke, J.R., Gabe, R., Croudace, T.J., Tober, G., & Raistrick, D. (2014). Factor analysis of treatment outcomes from a UK specialist addiction service: Relationship between the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire, Social Satisfaction Questionnaire and CORE-10. Drug and Alcohol Review, 33, 643–650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groshkova, T., Best, D., & White, W. (2013). The assessment of recovery capital: Properties and psychometrics of a measure of addiction recovery strengths. Drug and Alcohol Review, 32, 187–194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heather, N., & McCambridge, J. on behalf of the UKATT Research Team. (2013). Post-treatment stage of change predicts 12-month outcome of treatment for alcohol problems. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 48, 329–336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2013). Drug strategy annual review: Delivering within a new landscape. London: Home Office
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, N.S., Roberts, L.J., Berns, S.B., & McGlinchey, J.B. (1999). Methods for defining and determining the clinical significance of treatment effects: Description, application, and alternatives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 300–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudet, A. (2007). What does recovery mean to you? Lessons from the recovery experience for research and practice. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33, 243–256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, J., Farrell, M., Bradbury, G., Dale-Perera, A., Eastwood, B., Roxburgh, M., & Taylor, S. (2008). Development of the treatment outcome profile. Addiction, 103, 1450–1460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrady, B.S. (2014). To have but one true friend: Implications for practice of research on alcohol use disorders and social networks. Psychology of Addictive Medicine, 18, 113–121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeganey, N. (2012). Harm reduction at the crossroads and the rediscovery of drug user abstinence. Drugs: Education Prevention and Policy, 19, 276–283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeganey, N., Morris, Z., Neale, J., & Robertson, M. (2004). What are drug users looking for when they contact drug services: Abstinence or harm reduction? Drugs: Education Prevention and Policy, 11, 423–435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie, S., Whittington, C., Hamoudi, Z., Zamani, F., Tober, G., & West, R. (2012). Identification of behaviour change techniques to reduce excessive alcohol consumption. Addiction, 107, 1431–1440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, W.R., & Moyers, T.B. (2015). The forest and the trees: Relational and specific factors in addiction treatment. Addiction, 110, 401–413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, J., Finch, E., Marsden, J., Mitcheson, L., Rose, D., Strang, J., … Wykes, T. (2014). How should we measure addiction recovery? Analysis of service provider perspectives using online Delphi groups. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 21, 310–323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, J., Tomkins, C., Wheeler, C., Finch, E., Marsden, J., Mitcheson, L., … Strang, J. (2015). “You’re all going to hate the word ‘recovery’ by the end of this”: Service users’ views of measuring addiction recovery. Drugs: Education, Prevention, and Policy, 22, 26–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHS Commissioning Board. (2012). Everyone counts: Planning for patients 2013/14. London: Department of Health
   Google Scholar
• Orford, J., Hodgson, R., Copello, A., Smith, M., Black, R., Fryer, K., … Slegg, G.; on behalf of the UKATT Research Team. (2006). The clients’ perspective on change during treatment for an alcohol problem: Qualitative analysis on follow-up interviews in the UK Alcohol Treatment Trial. Addiction, 101, 60–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raistrick, D. (2013). Too many rating scales: Not enough validation. Addiction, 1, 11–12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raistrick, D., Tober, G., Sweetman, J., Unsworth, S., Crosby, H., & Evans, T. (2014). Measuring clinically significant outcomes: LDQ, CORE-10, and SSQ as dimension measures of addiction. The Psychiatrist, 38, 112–115
   Google Scholar
• Russell, C. (2012). Persuading addiction treatment providers to practice the concept of recovery will not be easy (editorial). Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 19, 273–275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurgood, S., Crosby, H.F., Raistrick, D., & Tober, G. (2014). Service user, family and friends’ views on the meaning of a ‘good outcome’ of treatment for an addiction problem. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 21, 324–332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiffany, S.T., Friedman, L., Greenfield, S.F., Hasin, D.S., & Jackson, R. (2012). Beyond drug use: A systematic consideration of other outcomes in evaluations of treatments for substance use disorders. Addiction, 107, 709–718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tober, G., & Raistrick, D. (Eds.). (2007). Motivational dialogue: Preparing addiction professionals for motivational interviewing. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Tober, G., Raistrick, D., Crosby, H.F., Sweetman, J., Unsworth, S., Suna, L., & Copello, A. (2013). Co-producing addiction aftercare. Drugs and Alcohol Today, 13, 225–233
   Google Scholar
• Velleman, R., & Templeton, L. (2007). Understanding and modifying the impact of parents’ substance misuse on children. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 13, 79–89
   Google Scholar
• White, W. (2008). Recovery management and recovery-oriented systems of care: Scientific rationale and promising practices. Pittsburgh, PA: Northeast Addiction Technology Transfer Center, Great Lakes Addiction Technology Transfer Center, Philadelphia Department of Behavioral Health & Mental Retardation Services
   Google Scholar
• WHOQOL Group. (1994). Development of the WHOQOL: Rationale and current status. International Journal of Mental Health, 23, 24–56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551–558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar