The Sec translocon mediated protein transport in prokaryotes and eukaryotes

References

• Abell BM, Pool MR, Schlenker O, Sinning I, High S. 2004. Signal recognition particle mediates post-translational targeting in eukaryotes. EMBO J 23:2755–2764
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aebi M, Bernasconi R, Clerc S, Molinari M. 2010. N-glycan structures: Recognition and processing in the ER. Trends Biochem Sci 35:74–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aebi M, Schuldiner M, Schwappach B. 2013. N-linked protein glycosylation in the ER. Biochim Biophys Acta – Mol Cell Res 1833:2430–2437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akita M, Sasaki S, Matsuyama S, Mizushima S. 1990. SecA interacts with secretory proteins by recognizing the positive charge at the amino terminus of the signal peptide in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 265:8164–8169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akopian D, Dalal K, Shen K, Duong F, Shan S-o. 2013a. SecYEG activates GTPases to drive the completion of cotranslational protein targeting. J Cell Biol 200:397–405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akopian D, Shen K, Zhang X, Shan S-o. 2013b. Signal recognition particle: An essential protein-targeting machine. Annu Rev Biochem 82:693–721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alami M, Dalal K, Lelj-Garolla B, Sligar SG, Duong F. 2007. Nanodiscs unravel the interaction between the SecYEG channel and its cytosolic partner SecA. EMBO J 26:1995–2004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Albiniak AM, Baglieri J, Robinson C. 2012. Targeting of lumenal proteins across the thylakoid membrane. J Experim Bot 63:1689–1698
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alder NN, Shen Y, Brodsky JL, Hendershot LM, Johnson AE. 2005. The molecular mechanisms underlying BiP-mediated gating of the Sec61 translocon of the endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Biol 168:389–399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ampofo E, Welker S, Jung M, Müller L, Greiner M, Zimmermann R, Montenarh M. 2013. CK2 phosphorylation of human Sec63 regulates its interaction with Sec62. Biochim Biophys Acta – Gen Subj 1830:2938–2945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelini S, Boy D, Schiltz E, Koch HG. 2006. Membrane binding of the bacterial signal recognition particle receptor involves two distinct binding sites. J Cell Biol 174:715–724
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Angelini S, Deitermann S, Koch HG. 2005. FtsY, the bacterial signal-recognition particle receptor, interacts functionally and physically with the SecYEG translocon. EMBO Rep 6:476–481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonin W, Meyer HA, Hartmann E. 2000. Interactions between Spc2p and other components of the endoplasmic reticulum translocation sites of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 275:34068–34072
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Antonoaea R, Fürst M, Nishiyama K-i, Müller M. 2008. The periplasmic chaperone PpiD interacts with secretory proteins exiting from the SecYEG translocon. Biochemistry 47:5649–5656
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ast T, Cohen G, Schuldiner M. 2013. A network of cytosolic factors targets SRP-independent proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell 152:1134–1145
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ataide SF, Schmitz N, Shen K, Ke A, Shan SO, Doudna JA, Ban N. 2011. The crystal structure of the signal recognition particle in complex with its receptor. Science 331:881–886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auclair SM, Bhanu MK, Kendall DA. 2012. Signal peptidase I: Cleaving the way to mature proteins. Protein Sci 21:13–25
   Google Scholar
• Bacher G, Lutcke H, Jungnickel B, Rapoport TA, Dobberstein B. 1996. Regulation by the ribosome of the GTPase of the signal-recognition particle during protein targeting. Nature 381:248–251
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bahari L, Parlitz R, Eitan A, Stjepanovic G, Bochkareva ES, Sinning I, Bibi E. 2007. Membrane Targeting of ribosomes and their release require distinct and separable functions of FtsY. J Biol Chem 282:32168–32175
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baker JL, Celik E, DeLisa MP. 2013. Expanding the glycoengineering toolbox: The rise of bacterial N-linked protein glycosylation. Trends Biotechnol 31:313–323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bange G, Sinning I. 2013. SIMIBI twins in protein targeting and localization. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:776–780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baram D, Pyetan E, Sittner A, Auerbach-Nevo T, Bashan A, Yonath A. 2005. Structure of trigger factor binding domain in biologically homologous complex with eubacterial ribosome reveals its chaperone action. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:12017–12022
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beck K, Eisner G, Trescher D, Dalbey RE, Brunner J, Muller M, Müller M. 2001. YidC, an assembly site for polytopic Escherichia coli membrane proteins located in immediate proximity to the SecYE translocon and lipids. EMBO Rep 2:709–714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck K, Wu L-F, Brunner J, Muller M. 2000. Discrimination between SRP- and SecA/SecB-dependent substrates involves selective recognition of nascent chains by SRP and trigger factor. EMBO J 19:134–143
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Becker T, Bhushan S, Jarasch A, Armache J-P, Funes S, Jossinet F, et al. 2009. Structure of monomeric yeast and mammalian Sec61 complexes interacting with the translating ribosome. Science 326:1369–1373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beha D, Deitermann S, Muller M, Koch HG. 2003. Export of beta-lactamase is independent of the signal recognition particle. J Biol Chem 278:22161–22167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Behrens C, Hartmann E, Kalies KU. 2013. Single rRNA helices bind independently to the protein-conducting channel SecYEG. Traffic 14:274–281
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benedix J, Lajoie P, Jaiswal H, Burgard C, Greiner M, Zimmermann R, et al. 2010. BiP modulates the affinity of its co-chaperone ERj1 for ribosomes. J Biol Chem 285:36427–36433
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berndt U, Oellerer S, Zhang Y, Johnson AE, Rospert S. 2009. A signal-anchor sequence stimulates signal recognition particle binding to ribosomes from inside the exit tunnel. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:1398–1403
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bernstein HD, Zopf D, Freymann DM, Walter P. 1993. Functional substitution of the signal recognition particle 54-kDa subunit by its Escherichia coli homolog. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:5229–5233
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bibi E. 2011. Early targeting events during membrane protein biogenesis in Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta – Biomembr 1808:841–850
   Google Scholar
• Bibi E. 2012. Is there a twist in the Escherichia coli signal recognition particle pathway? Trends Biochem Sci 37:1–6
   Google Scholar
• Bieker KL, Silhavy TJ. 1990. The genetics of protein secretion in E. coli. Trends Genet 6:329–334
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bingel-Erlenmeyer R, Kohler R, Kramer G, Sandikci A, Antolic S, Maier T, et al. 2008. A peptide deformylase-ribosome complex reveals mechanism of nascent chain processing. Nature 452:108–111
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blau M, Mullapudi S, Becker T, Dudek J, Zimmermann R, Penczek PA, Beckmann R. 2005. ERj1p uses a universal ribosomal adaptor site to coordinate the 80S ribosome at the membrane. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12:1015–1016
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blobel G, Sabatini DD. 1970. Controlled proteolysis of nascent polypeptides in rat liver cell fractions. I. Location of the polypeptides within ribosomes. J Cell Biol 45:130–145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdanov M, Dowhan W. 1998. Phospholipid-assisted protein folding: Phosphatidylethanolamine is required at a late step of the conformational maturation of the polytopic membrane protein lactose permease. EMBO J 17:5255–5264
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bogdanov M, Dowhan W. 2012. Lipid-dependent generation of dual topology for a membrane protein. J Biol Chem 287:37939–37948
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bogdanov M, Sun J, Kaback HR, Dowhan W. 1996. A phospholipid acts as a chaperone in assembly of a membrane transport protein. J Biol Chem 271:11615–11618
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boisramé A, Chasles M, Babour A, Beckerich J-M, Gaillardin C. 2002. Sbh1p, a subunit of the Sec61 translocon, interacts with the chaperone calnexin in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. J Cell Sci 115:4947–4956
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bornemann T, Jöckel J, Rodnina MV, Wintermeyer W. 2008. Signal sequence-independent membrane targeting of ribosomes containing short nascent peptides within the exit tunnel. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15:494–499
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braig D, Bär C, Thumfart J-O, Koch HG. 2009. Two cooperating helices constitute the lipid-binding domain of the bacterial SRP receptor. J Mol Biol 390:401–413
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braig D, Mircheva M, Sachelaru I, van der Sluis EO, Sturm L, Beckmann R, Koch HG. 2011. Signal sequence-independent SRP-SR complex formation at the membrane suggests an alternative targeting pathway within the SRP cycle. Mol Cell Biol 22:2309–2323
   Google Scholar
• Brodsky JL, Goeckeler J, Schekman R. 1995. BiP and Sec63p are required for both co- and posttranslational protein translocation into the yeast endoplasmic reticulum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:9643–9646
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Broude NE. 2011. Analysis of RNA localization and metabolism in single live bacterial cells: Achievements and challenges. Mol Microbiol 80:1137–1147
   Google Scholar
• Brundage L, Hendrick JP, Schiebel E, Driessen AJM, Wickner W. 1990. The purified E. coli integral membrane protein SecYE is sufficient for reconstitution of SecA-dependent precursor protein translocation. Cell 62:649–657
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burda P, Aebi M. 1999. The dolichol pathway of N-linked glycosylation. Biochim Biophys Acta – Gen Subj 1426:239–257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calo D, Eichler J. 2011. Crossing the membrane in Archaea, the third domain of life. Biochim Biophys Acta – Biomembr 1808:885–891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao TB, Saier MH Jr. 2003. The general protein secretory pathway: phylogenetic analyses leading to evolutionary conclusions. Biochim Biophys Acta – Biomembr 1609:115–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castanié-Cornet M-P, Bruel N, Genevaux P. 2013. Chaperone networking facilitates protein targeting to the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane. Biochim Biophys Acta – Mol Cell Res. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.11.007
   Google Scholar
• Chang CN, Blobel G, Model P. 1978. Detection of prokaryotic signal peptidase in an Escherichia coli membrane fraction: Endoproteolytic cleavage of nascent f1 pre-coat protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:361–365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavan M, Yan A, Lennarz WJ. 2005. Subunits of the translocon interact with components of the oligosaccharyl transferase complex. J Biol Chem 280:22917–22924
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen M, Xie K, Jiang F, Yi L, Dalbey REE. 2002. YidC, a newly defined evolutionarily conserved protein, mediates membrane protein assembly in bacteria. Biol Chem 383:1565–1572
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen R, Henning U. 1996. A periplasmic protein (Skp) of Escherichia coli selectively binds a class of outer membrane proteins. Mol Microbiol 19:1287–1294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Helenius J, Braakman I, Helenius A. 1995. Cotranslational folding and calnexin binding during glycoprotein synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:6229–6233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Z, Jiang Y, Mandon EC, Gilmore R. 2005. Identification of cytoplasmic residues of Sec61p involved in ribosome binding and cotranslational translocation. J Cell Biol 168:67–77
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chirico WJ, Waters MG, Blobel G. 1988. 70K heat shock related proteins stimulate protein translocation into microsomes. Nature 332:805–810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemons WM, Ménétret J-F, Akey CW, Rapoport TA. 2004. Structural insight into the protein translocation channel. Curr Opin Struct Biol 14:390–396
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cline K, Dabney-Smith C. 2008. Plastid protein import and sorting: Different paths to the same compartments. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:585–592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross BC, High S. 2009. Dissecting the physiological role of selective transmembrane-segment retention at the ER translocon. J Cell Sci 122:1768–1777
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cunningham K, Lill R, Crooke E, Rice M, Moore K, Wickner W, Oliver D. 1989. SecA protein, a peripheral protein of the Escherichia coli plasma membrane, is essential for the functional binding and translocation of proOmpA. EMBO J 8:955–959
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Czaplinski K, Singer RH. 2006. Pathways for mRNA localization in the cytoplasm. Trends Biochem Sci 31:687–693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalal K, Nguyen N, Alami M, Tan J, Moraes TF, Lee WC, et al. 2009. Structure, binding, and activity of Syd, a SecY-interacting protein. J Biol Chem 284:7897–7902
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dalbey RE, Lively MO, Bron S, Dijl JMV. 1997. The chemistry and enzymology of the type I signal peptidases. Protein Sci 6:1129–1138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalbey RE, Wang P, Kuhn A. 2011. Assembly of bacterial inner membrane proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 80:161–187
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dalbey RE, Wang P, van Dijl JM. 2012. Membrane proteases in the bacterial protein secretion and quality control pathway. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76:311–330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daley DO, Rapp M, Granseth E, Melén K, Drew D, von Heijne G. 2005. Global topology analysis of the Escherichia coli inner membrane proteome. Science 308:1321–1323
   Google Scholar
• Dartigalongue C, Raina S. 1998. A new heat-shock gene, ppiD, encodes a peptidyl-prolyl isomerase required for folding of outer membrane proteins in Escherichia coli. EMBO J 17:3968–3980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Cook H, Tommassen J. 1991. Conservation of components of the Escherichia coli export machinery in prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Lett 80:195–199
   Google Scholar
• de Gier J-WL, Mansournia P, Valent QA, Phillips GJ, Luirink J, von Heijne G. 1996. Assembly of a cytoplasmic membrane protein in Escherichia coli is dependent on the signal recognition particle. FEBS Lett 399:307–309
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Vrije T, de Swart RL, Dowhan W, Tommassen J, de Kruijff B. 1988. Phosphatidylglycerol is involved in protein translocation across Escherichia coli inner membranes. Nature 334:173–175
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deitermann S, Sprie GS, Koch HG. 2005. A dual function for SecA in the assembly of single spanning membrane proteins in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 280:39077–39085
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demirci E, Junne T, Baday S, Bernèche S, Spiess M. 2013. Functional asymmetry within the Sec61p translocon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:18856–18861
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Denic V, Dotsch V, Sinning I. 2013. Endoplasmic reticulum targeting and insertion of tail-anchored membrane proteins by the GET pathway. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5:a013334
   Google Scholar
• Deshaies RJ, Koch BD, Werner-Washburne M, Craig EA, Schekman R. 1988. A subfamily of stress proteins facilitates translocation of secretory and mitochondrial precursor polypeptides. Nature 332:800–805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshaies RJ, Sanders SL, Feldheim DA, Schekman R. 1991. Assembly of yeast Sec proteins involved in translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum into a membrane-bound multisubunit complex. Nature 349:806–808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshaies RJ, Schekman R. 1987. A yeast mutant defective at an early stage in import of secretory protein precursors into the endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Biol 105:633–645
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deshaies RJ, Schekman R. 1989. SEC62 encodes a putative membrane protein required for protein translocation into the yeast endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Biol 109:2653–2664
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deuerling E, Patzelt H, Vorderwülbecke S, Rauch T, Kramer G, Schaffitzel E, et al. 2003. Trigger factor and DnaK possess overlapping substrate pools and binding specificities. Mol Microbiol 47:1317–1328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deville K, Gold VAM, Robson A, Whitehouse S, Sessions RB, Baldwin SA, et al. 2011. The oligomeric state and arrangement of the active bacterial translocon. J Biol Chem 286:4659–4669
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dierks T, Volkmer J, Schlenstedt G, Jung C, Sandholzer U, Zachmann K, et al. 1996. A microsomal ATP-binding protein involved in efficient protein transport into the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO J 15:6931–6942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douville K, Price A, Eichler J, Economou A, Wickner W. 1995. SecYEG and SecA are the stoichiometric components of preprotein translocase. J Biol Chem 270:20106–20111
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dowhan W, Bogdanov M. 2009. Lipid-dependent membrane protein topogenesis. Annu Rev Biochem 78:515–540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew D, Fröderberg L, Baars L, de Gier J-WL. 2003. Assembly and overexpression of membrane proteins in Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta – Biomembr 1610:3–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driessen AJ, Wickner W. 1991. Proton transfer is rate-limiting for translocation of precursor proteins by the Escherichia coli translocase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:2471–2475
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Driessen AJM, Nouwen N. 2008. Protein translocation across the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane. Annu Rev Biochem 77:643–667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudek J, Greiner M, Muller A, Hendershot LM, Kopsch K, Nastainczyk W, Zimmermann R. 2005. ERj1p has a basic role in protein biogenesis at the endoplasmic reticulum. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12:1008–1014
   Google Scholar
• Dudek J, Volkmer J, Bies C, Guth S, Muller A, Lerner M, et al. 2002. A novel type of co-chaperone mediates transmembrane recruitment of DnaK-like chaperones to ribosomes. EMBO J 21:2958–2967
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dünnwald M, Varshavsky A, Johnsson N. 1999. Detection of transient in vivo interactions between substrate and transporter during protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Cell Biol 10:329–344
   Google Scholar
• Duong F, Wickner W. 1997a. The SecDFyajC domain of preprotein translocase controls preprotein movement by regulating SecA membrane cycling. EMBO J 16:4871–4879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duong F, Wickner W. 1997b. Distinct catalytic roles of the SecYE, SecG and SecDFyajC subunits of preprotein translocase holoenzyme. EMBO J 16:2756–2768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egea PF, Napetschnig J, Walter P, Stroud RM. 2008. Structures of SRP54 and SRP19, the two proteins that organize the ribonucleic core of the signal recognition particle from Pyrococcus furiosus. PLoS One 3:e3528
   Google Scholar
• Egea PF, Shan SO, Napetschnig J, Savage DF, Walter P, Stroud RM. 2004. Substrate twinning activates the signal recognition particle and its receptor. Nature 427:215–221
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Egea PF, Stroud RM. 2010. Lateral opening of a translocon upon entry of protein suggests the mechanism of insertion into membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:17182–17187
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eichler J. 2003. Evolution of the prokaryotic protein translocation complex: A comparison of archaeal and bacterial versions of SecDF. Mol Phylogen Evol 27:504–509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitan A, Bibi E. 2004. The core Escherichia coli signal recognition particle receptor contains only the N and G domains of FtsY. J Bacteriol 186:2492–2494
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Emr SD, Hanley-Way S, Silhavy TJ. 1981. Suppressor mutations that restore export of a protein with a defective signal sequence. Cell 23:79–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enquist K, Fransson M, Boekel C, Bengtsson I, Geiger K, Lang L, et al. 2009. Membrane-integration characteristics of two ABC transporters, CFTR and P-glycoprotein. J Mol Biol 387:1153–1164
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epand RM, Epand RF. 2011. Functional consequences of the lateral organization of biological membranes. In: Yeagle PL, ed. The Structure of Biological Membranes, 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press
   Google Scholar
• Erdmann F, Schäuble N, Lang S, Jung M, Honigmann A, Ahmad M, et al. 2011. Interaction of calmodulin with Sec61α limits Ca2+ leakage from the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO J 30:17–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandson KJ, Miller SBM, Nam Y, Osborne AR, Zimmer J, Rapoport TA. 2008. A role for the two-helix finger of the SecA ATPase in protein translocation. Nature 455:984–987
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Facey SJ, Neugebauer SA, Krauss S, Kuhn A. 2007. The mechanosensitive channel protein MscL is targeted by the SRP to the novel YidC membrane insertion pathway of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 365:995–1004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fang H, Green N. 1994. Nonlethal sec71-1 and sec72-1 mutations eliminate proteins associated with the Sec63p-BiP complex from S. cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 5:933–942
   Google Scholar
• Fekkes P, De Wit JG, Van Der Wolk JPW, Kimsey HH, Kumamoto CA, Driessen AJM. 1998. Preprotein transfer to the Escherichia coli translocase requires the co-operative binding of SecB and the signal sequence to SecA. Mol Microbiol 29:1179–1190
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feldheim D, Yoshimura K, Admon A, Schekman R. 1993. Structural and functional characterization of Sec66p, a new subunit of the polypeptide translocation apparatus in the yeast endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Cell Biol 4:931–939
   Google Scholar
• Ferbitz L, Maier T, Patzelt H, Bukau B, Deuerling E, Ban N. 2004. Trigger factor in complex with the ribosome forms a molecular cradle for nascent proteins. Nature 431:590–596
   Google Scholar
• Finke K, Plath K, Panzner S, Prehn S, Rapoport TA, Hartmann E, Sommer T. 1996. A second trimeric complex containing homologs of the Sec61p complex functions in protein transport across the ER membrane of S. cerevisiae. EMBO J 15:1482–1494
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flanagan JJ, Chen JC, Miao Y, Shao Y, Lin J, Bock PE, Johnson AE. 2003. Signal recognition particle binds to ribosome-bound signal sequences with fluorescence-detected subnanomolar affinity that does not diminish as the nascent chain lengthens. J Biol Chem 278:18628–18637
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flourakis M, Van Coppenolle F, Lehen’kyi Vy, Beck B, Skryma R, Prevarskaya N. 2006. Passive calcium leak via translocon is a first step for iPLA2-pathway regulated store operated channels activation. FASEB J 20:1215–1217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flower AM. 2001. SecG function and phospholipid metabolism in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 183:2006–2012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flower AM, Hines LL, Pfennig PL. 2000. SecG is an auxiliary component of the protein export apparatus of Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet 263:131–136
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Focia PJ, Shepotinovskaya IV, Seidler JA, Freymann DM. 2004. Heterodimeric GTPase core of the SRP targeting complex. Science 303:373–377
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fons RD, Bogert BA, Hegde RS. 2003. Substrate-specific function of the translocon-associated protein complex during translocation across the ER membrane. J Cell Biol 160:529–539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frauenfeld J, Gumbart J, v d Sluis EO, Funes S, Gartmann M, Beatrix B, et al. 2011. Cryo-EM structure of the ribosome-SecYE complex in the membrane environment. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18:614–621
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fulga TA, Sinning I, Dobberstein B, Pool MR. 2001. SRbeta coordinates signal sequence release from SRP with ribosome binding to the translocon. EMBO J 20:2338–2347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia PD, Walter P. 1988. Full-length prepro-alpha-factor can be translocated across the mammalian microsomal membrane only if translation has not terminated. J Cell Biol 106:1043–1048
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gatsos X, Perry AJ, Anwari K, Dolezal P, Wolynec PP, Likić VA, et al. 2008. Protein secretion and outer membrane assembly in Alphaproteobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32:995–1009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelis I, Bonvin AMJJ, Keramisanou D, Koukaki M, Gouridis G, Karamanou S, et al. 2007. Structural basis for signal-sequence recognition by the translocase motor SecA as determined by NMR. Cell 131:756–769
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilmore R, Blobel G, Walter P. 1982a. Protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum. I. Detection in the microsomal membrane of a receptor for the signal recognition particle. J Cell Biol 95:463–469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore R, Walter P, Blobel G. 1982b. Protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum. II. Isolation and characterization of the signal recognition particle receptor. J Cell Biol 95:470–477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goder V, Bieri C, Spiess M. 1999. Glycosylation can influence topogenesis of membrane proteins and reveals dynamic reorientation of nascent polypeptides within the translocon. J Cell Biol 147:257–266
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gogala M, Becker T, Beatrix B, Armache J-P, Barrio-Garcia C, Berninghausen O, Beckmann R. 2014. Structures of the Sec61 complex engaged in nascent peptide translocation or membrane insertion. Nature 506:107–110
   Google Scholar
• Gold VAM, Robson A, Bao H, Romantsov T, Duong F, Collinson I. 2010. The action of cardiolipin on the bacterial translocon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:10044–10049
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gordon SM, Kindt TJ. 1976. BIP: A low molecular weight protein coisolated with beta-2 microglublin. Biochem a Biophys Res Commun 72:984–990
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorlich D, Rapoport TA. 1993. Protein translocation into proteoliposomes reconstituted from purified components of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Cell 75:615–630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görlich D, Hartmann E, Prehn S, Rapoport TA. 1992. A protein of the endoplasmic reticulum involved early in polypeptide translocation. Nature 357:47–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götz C, Müller A, Montenarh M, Zimmermann R, Dudek J. 2009. The ER-membrane-resident Hsp40 ERj1 is a novel substrate for protein kinase CK2. Biochem a Biophys Res Commun 388:637–642
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gouridis G, Karamanou S, Gelis I, Kalodimos CG, Economou A. 2009. Signal peptides are allosteric activators of the protein translocase. Nature 462:363–367
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gruss OJ, Feick P, Frank R, Dobberstein B. 1999. Phosphorylation of components of the ER translocation site. Eur J Biochem 260:785–793
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gu SQ, Peske F, Wieden HJ, Rodnina MV, Wintermeyer W. 2003. The signal recognition particle binds to protein L23 at the peptide exit of the Escherichia coli ribosome. RNA 9:566–573
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gumbart J, Schulten K. 2008. The roles of pore ring and plug in the SecY protein-conducting channel. J Gen Physiol 132:709–719
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gumbart J, Trabuco LG, Schreiner E, Villa E, Schulten K. 2009. Regulation of the protein-conducting channel by a bound ribosome. Structure 17:1453–1464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez JA, Crowley PJ, Cvitkovitch DG, Brady LJ, Hamilton IR, Hillman JD, Bleiweis AS. 1999. Streptococcus mutans ffh, a gene encoding a homologue of the 54 kDa subunit of the signal recognition particle, is involved in resistance to acid stress. Microbiology 145:357–366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainzl T, Huang SH, Sauer-Eriksson AE. 2002. Structure of the SRP19-RNA complex and implications for signal recognition particle assembly. Nature 417:767–771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainzl T, Huang SH, Sauer-Eriksson AE. 2005. Structural insights into SRP RNA: An induced fit mechanism for SRP assembly. RNA 11:1043–1050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halic M, Becker T, Pool MR, Spahn CM, Grassucci RA, Frank J, Beckmann R. 2004. Structure of the signal recognition particle interacting with the elongation-arrested ribosome. Nature 427:808–814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halic M, Blau M, Becker T, Mielke T, Pool MR, Wild K, Sinning I, Beckmann R. 2006. Following the signal sequence from ribosomal tunnel exit to signal recognition particle. Nature 444:507–511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamman BD, Chen J-C, Johnson EE, Johnson AE. 1997. The aqueous pore through the translocon has a diameter of 40–60 Å during cotranslational protein translocation at the ER membrane. Cell 89:535–544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamman BD, Hendershot LM, Johnson AE. 1998. BiP maintains the permeability barrier of the ER membrane by sealing the lumenal end of the translocon pore before and early in translocation. Cell 92:747–758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand NJ, Klein R, Laskewitz A, Pohlschröder M. 2006. Archaeal and bacterial SecD and SecF homologs exhibit striking structural and functional conservation. J Bacteriol 188:1251–1259
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hann BC, Walter P. 1991. The signal recognition particle in S. cerevisiae. Cell 67:131–144
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harada Y, Li H, Lennarz WJ. 2009. Oligosaccharyltransferase directly binds to ribosome at a location near the translocon-binding site. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:6945–6949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms N, Koningstein G, Dontje W, Muller M, Oudega B, Luirink J, de Cock H. 2001. The early interaction of the outer membrane protein phoe with the periplasmic chaperone Skp occurs at the cytoplasmic membrane. J Biol Chem 276:18804–18811
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris CR, Silhavy TJ. 1999. Mapping an interface of SecY (PrlA) and SecE (PrlG) by using synthetic phenotypes and in vivo cross-linking. J Bacteriol 181:3438–3444
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartman H, Smith TF. 2010. GTPases and the origin of the ribosome. Biol Direct 5:36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartmann E, Gorlich D, Kostka S, Otto A, Kraft R, Knespel S, et al. 1993. A tetrameric complex of membrane proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. Eur J Biochem 214:375–381
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartmann E, Sommer T, Prehn S, Görlich D, Jentsch S, Rapoport TA. 1994. Evolutionary conservation of components of the protein translocation complex. Nature 367:654–657
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hasona A, Crowley PJ, Levesque CM, Mair RW, Cvitkovitch DG, Bleiweis AS, Brady LJ. 2005. Streptococcal viability and diminished stress tolerance in mutants lacking the signal recognition particle pathway or YidC2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:17466–17471
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hegde RS, Bernstein HD. 2006. The surprising complexity of signal sequences. Trends Biochem Sci 31:563–571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegde RS, Keenan RJ. 2011. Tail-anchored membrane protein insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum. Nat Rev Mol Cell biol 12:787–798
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hegde RS, Voigt S, Rapoport TA, Lingappa VR. 1998. TRAM regulates the exposure of nascent secretory proteins to the cytosol during translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell 92:621–631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich SU, Mothes W, Brunner J, Rapoport TA. 2000. The Sec61p complex mediates the integration of a membrane protein by allowing lipid partitioning of the transmembrane domain. Cell 102:233–244
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heinrich SU, Rapoport TA. 2003. Cooperation of transmembrane segments during the integration of a double-spanning protein into the ER membrane. EMBO J 22:3654–3663
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helmers J, Schmidt D, Glavy JS, Blobel G, Schwartz T. 2003. The beta-subunit of the protein-conducting channel of the endoplasmic reticulum functions as the guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the beta-subunit of the signal recognition particle receptor. J Biol Chem 278:23686–23690
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hermesh O, Jansen R-P. 2013. Take the (RN)A-train: Localization of mRNA to the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochim Biophys Acta – Mol Cell Res 1833:2519–2525
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herskovits AA, Bibi E. 2000. Association of Escherichia coli ribosomes with the inner membrane requires the signal recognition particle receptor but is independent of the signal recognition particle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:4621–4626
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herskovits AA, Shimoni E, Minsky A, Bibi E. 2002. Accumulation of endoplasmic membranes and novel membrane-bound ribosome-signal recognition particle receptor complexes in Escherichia coli. J Cell Biol 159:403–410
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hessa T, Kim H, Bihlmaier K, Lundin C, Boekel J, Andersson H, et al. 2005. Recognition of transmembrane helices by the endoplasmic reticulum translocon. Nature 433:377–381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higy M, Gander S, Spiess M. 2005. Probing the environment of signal-anchor sequences during topogenesis in the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochemistry 44:2039–2047
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hizlan D, Robson A, Whitehouse S, Gold Vicki A, Vonck J, Mills D, et al. 2012. Structure of the SecY complex unlocked by a preprotein mimic. Cell Rep 1:21–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffmann A, Becker Annemarie H, Zachmann-Brand B, Deuerling E, Bukau B, Kramer G. 2012. Concerted action of the ribosome and the associated chaperone trigger factor confines nascent polypeptide folding. Mol Cell 48:63–74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holtkamp W, Lee S, Bornemann T, Senyushkina T, Rodnina MV, Wintermeyer W. 2012. Dynamic switch of the signal recognition particle from scanning to targeting. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19:1332–1337
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hori O, Miyazaki M, Tamatani T, Ozawa K, Takano K, Okabe M, et al. 2006. Deletion of SERP1/RAMP4, a component of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) translocation sites, leads to ER stress. Mol Cell Biol 26:4257–4267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou B, Lin PJ, Johnson AE. 2012. Membrane protein TM segments are retained at the translocon during integration until the nascent chain cues FRET-detected release into bulk lipid. Mol Cell 48:398–408
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Houben EN, Zarivach R, Oudega B, Luirink J. 2005. Early encounters of a nascent membrane protein: specificity and timing of contacts inside and outside the ribosome. J Cell Biol 170:27–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huber D, Boyd D, Xia Y, Olma MH, Gerstein M, Beckwith J. 2005. Use of thioredoxin as a reporter to identify a subset of Escherichia coli signal sequences that promote signal recognition particle-dependent translocation. J Bacteriol 187:2983–2991
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huber D, Rajagopalan N, Preissler S, Rocco MA, Merz F, Kramer G, Bukau B. 2011. SecA interacts with ribosomes in order to facilitate posttranslational translocation in bacteria. Mol Cell 41:343–353
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunt JF, Weinkauf S, Henry L, Fak JJ, McNicholas P, Oliver DB, Deisenhofer J. 2002. Nucleotide control of interdomain interactions in the conformational reaction cycle of SecA. Science 297:2018–2026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingolia NT, Ghaemmaghami S, Newman JRS, Weissman JS. 2009. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 324:218–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail N, Crawshaw SG, Cross BCS, Haagsma AC, High S. 2008. Specific transmembrane segments are selectively delayed at the ER translocon during opsin biogenesis. Biochem J 411:495–506
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ismail N, Hedman R, Schiller N, von Heijne G. 2012. A biphasic pulling force acts on transmembrane helices during translocon-mediated membrane integration. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19:1018–1022
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ito K, Akiyama Y. 2005. Cellular functions, mechanism of action, and regulation of FtsH protease. Annul Rev Microbiol 59:211–231
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ito K, Wittekind M, Nomura M, Shiba K, Yura T, Miura A, Nashimoto H. 1983. A temperature-sensitive mutant of E. coli exhibiting slow processing of exported proteins. Cell 32:789–797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagath JR, Matassova NB, de Leeuw E, Warnecke JM, Lentzen G, Rodnina MV, et al. 2001. Important role of the tetraloop region of 4.5S RNA in SRP binding to its receptor FtsY. RNA 7:293–301
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Janska H, Kwasniak M, Szczepanowska J. 2013. Protein quality control in organelles – AAA/FtsH story. Biochim Biophys Acta – Mol Cell Res 1833:381–387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaqaman K, Grinstein S. 2012. Regulation from within: The cytoskeleton in transmembrane signaling. Trends Cell Biol 22:515–526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarchow S, Luck C, Gorg A, Skerra A. 2008. Identification of potential substrate proteins for the periplasmic Escherichia coli chaperone Skp. Proteomics 8:4987–4994
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jermy AJ, Willer M, Davis E, Wilkinson BM, Stirling CJ. 2006. The Brl domain in Sec63p is required for assembly of functional endoplasmic reticulum translocons. J Biol Chem 281:7899–7906
   Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Cheng Z, Mandon EC, Gilmore R. 2008. An interaction between the SRP receptor and the translocon is critical during cotranslational protein translocation. J Cell Biol 180:1149–1161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson N, Haβdenteufel S, Theis M, Paton AW, Paton JC, Zimmermann R, High S. 2013. The signal sequence influences post-translational ER translocation at distinct stages. PLoS ONE 8:e75394
   Google Scholar
• Josefsson LG, Randall LL. 1981a. Different exported proteins in E. coli show differences in the temporal mode of processing in vivo. Cell 25:151–157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josefsson LG, Randall LL. 1981b. Processing in vivo of precursor maltose-binding protein in Escherichia coli occurs post-translationally as well as co-translationally. J Biol Chem 256:2504–2507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junne T, Schwede T, Goder V, Spiess M. 2006. The plug domain of yeast Sec61p is important for efficient protein translocation, but is not essential for cell viability. Mol Cell Biol 17:4063–4068
   Google Scholar
• Kalies K-U, Rapoport TA, Hartmann E. 1998. The β subunit of the Sec61 complex facilitates cotranslational protein transport and interacts with the signal peptidase during translocation. J Cell Biol 141:887–894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamyshev AL, Johnson AE. 2005. Selective SecA association with signal sequences in ribosome-bound nascent chains: A potential role for SecA in ribosome targeting to the bacterial membrane. J Biol Chem 280:37930–37940
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karaoglu D, Kelleher DJ, Gilmore R. 1997. The highly conserved Stt3 protein is a subunit of the yeast oligosaccharyltransferase and forms a subcomplex with Ost3p and Ost4p. J Biol Chem 272:32513–32520
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keenan RJ, Freymann DM, Walter P, Stroud RM. 1998. Crystal structure of the signal sequence binding subunit of the signal recognition particle. Cell 94:181–191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelkar A, Dobberstein B. 2009. Sec61beta, a subunit of the Sec61 protein translocation channel at the endoplasmic reticulum, is involved in the transport of Gurken to the plasma membrane. BMC Cell Biol 10:11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keller R, de Keyzer J, Driessen AJM, Palmer T. 2012. Co-operation between different targeting pathways during integration of a membrane protein. J Cell Biol 199:303–315
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keller RCA. 2011. The prediction of novel multiple lipid-binding regions in protein translocation motor proteins: A possible general feature. Cell Mol Biol Lett 16:40–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kihara A, Akiyama Y, Ito K. 1995. FtsH is required for proteolytic elimination of uncomplexed forms of SecY, an essential protein translocase subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:4532–4536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Coulombe PA. 2010. Emerging role for the cytoskeleton as an organizer and regulator of translation. Nat Rev Mol Cell biol 11:75–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kinch LN, Saier JMH, Grishin NV. 2002. Sec61β – a component of the archaeal protein secretory system. Trends Biochem Sci 27:170–171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoblauch NTM, Rüdiger S, Schönfeld H-J, Driessen AJM, Schneider-Mergener J, Bukau B. 1999. Substrate specificity of the SecB chaperone. J Biol Chem 274:34219–34225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knyazev DG, Lents A, Krause E, Ollinger N, Siligan C, Papinski D, et al. 2013. The bacterial translocon SecYEG opens upon ribosome binding. J Biol Chem 288:17941–17946
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koch HG, Hengelage T, Neumann-Haefelin C, MacFarlane J, Hoffschulte HK, Schimz K-L, et al. 1999. In vitro studies with purified components reveal signal recognition particle (SRP) and SecA/SecB as constituents of two independent protein-targeting pathways of Escherichia coli. Mol Cell Biol 10:2163–2173
   Google Scholar
• Koch HG, Müller M. 2000. Dissecting the translocase and integrase functions of the Escherichia coli SecYEG translocon. J Cell Biol 150:689–694
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Köhler R, Boehringer D, Greber B, Bingel-Erlenmeyer R, Collinson I, Schaffitzel C, Ban N. 2009. YidC and Oxa1 form dimeric insertion pores on the translating ribosome. Mol Cell 34:344–353
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kramer G, Boehringer D, Ban N, Bukau B. 2009. The ribosome as a platform for co-translational processing, folding and targeting of newly synthesized proteins. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16:589–597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer G, Rauch T, Rist W, Vorderwulbecke S, Patzelt H, Schulze-Specking A, et al. 2002. L23 protein functions as a chaperone docking site on the ribosome. Nature 419:171–174
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kraut-Cohen J, Afanasieva E, Haim-Vilmovsky L, Slobodin B, Yosef I, Bibi E, Gerst JE. 2013. Translation- and SRP-independent mRNA targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 24:3069–3084
   Google Scholar
• Kraut-Cohen J, Gerst JE. 2010. Addressing mRNAs to the ER: Cis sequences act up!. Trends Biochem Sci 35:459–469
   Google Scholar
• Krehenbrink M, Edwards A, Downie JA. 2011. The superoxide dismutase SodA is targeted to the periplasm in a SecA-dependent manner by a novel mechanism. Mol Microbiol 82:164–179
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krieg UC, Johnson AE, Walter P. 1989. Protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane: identification by photocross-linking of a 39-kD integral membrane glycoprotein as part of a putative translocation tunnel. J Cell Biol 109:2033–2043
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kroczynska B, Evangelista CM, Samant SS, Elguindi EC, Blond SY. 2004. The SANT2 domain of the murine tumor cell DnaJ-like protein 1 human homologue interacts with α1-antichymotrypsin and kinetically interferes with its serpin inhibitory activity. J Biol Chem 279:11432–11443
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kudva R, Denks K, Kuhn P, Vogt A, Muller M, Koch HG, Müller M. 2013. Protein translocation across the inner membrane of Gram-negative bacteria: The Sec and Tat dependent protein transport pathways. Res Microbiol 164:505–534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn P, Weiche B, Sturm L, Sommer E, Drepper F, Warscheid B, et al. 2011. The bacterial SRP receptor, SecA and the ribosome use overlapping binding sites on the SecY translocon. Traffic 12:563–578
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuhn P, Kudva R, Welte T, Sturm L, Koch HG. 2014. Targeting and integration of bacterial membrane proteins. In: Remi Fronzes HR, ed. Bacterial Membranes: Structural and Molecular Biology. Norwich, UK: Caister Academic Press; Horizon Scientific Press
   Google Scholar
• Kurzchalia TV, Wiedmann M, Girshovich AS, Bochkareva ES, Bielka H, Rapoport TA. 1986. The signal sequence of nascent preprolactin interacts with the 54K polypeptide of the signal recognition particle. Nature 320:634–636
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kusters R, Dowhan W, de Kruijff B. 1991. Negatively charged phospholipids restore prePhoE translocation across phosphatidylglycerol-depleted Escherichia coli inner membranes. J Biol Chem 266:8659–8662
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lakkaraju AK, Mary C, Scherrer A, Johnson AE, Strub K. 2008. SRP keeps polypeptides translocation-competent by slowing translation to match limiting ER-targeting sites. Cell 133:440–451
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lakkaraju AKK, Abrami L, Lemmin T, Blaskovic S, Kunz B, Kihara A, et al. 2012a. Palmitoylated calnexin is a key component of the ribosome-translocon complex. EMBO J 31:1823–1835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakkaraju AKK, Thankappan R, Mary C, Garrison JL, Taunton J, Strub K. 2012b. Efficient secretion of small proteins in mammalian cells relies on Sec62-dependent posttranslational translocation. Mol Cell Biol 23:2712–2722
   Google Scholar
• Lam VQ, Akopian D, Rome M, Henningsen D, Shan SO. 2010. Lipid activation of the signal recognition particle receptor provides spatial coordination of protein targeting. J Cell Biol 190:623–635
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lang S, Benedix J, Fedeles SV, Schorr S, Schirra C, Schäuble N, et al. 2012. Different effects of Sec61α, Sec62 and Sec63 depletion on transport of polypeptides into the endoplasmic reticulum of mammalian cells. J Cell Sci 125:1958–1969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen N, Zwieb C. 1993. The signal recognition particle database (SRPDB). Nucleic Acids Res 21:3019–3020
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lau JT, Welply JK, Shenbagamurthi P, Naider F, Lennarz WJ. 1983. Substrate recognition by oligosaccharyl transferase. Inhibition of co-translational glycosylation by acceptor peptides. J Biol Chem 258:15255–15260
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee AH, Iwakoshi NN, Glimcher LH. 2003. XBP-1 regulates a subset of endoplasmic reticulum resident chaperone genes in the unfolded protein response. Mol Cell Biol 23:7448–7459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HC, Bernstein HD. 2001. The targeting pathway of Escherichia coli presecretory and integral membrane proteins is specified by the hydrophobicity of the targeting signal. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:3471–3476
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leung E, Brown JD. 2010. Biogenesis of the signal recognition particle. Biochem Soc Trans 38:1093–1098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leznicki P, Clancy A, Schwappach B, High S. 2010. Bat3 promotes the membrane integration of tail-anchored proteins. J Cell Sci 123:2170–2178
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li W, Schulman S, Boyd D, Erlandson K, Beckwith J, Rapoport TA. 2007. The plug domain of the SecY protein stabilizes the closed state of the translocation channel and maintains a membrane seal. Mol Cell 26:511–521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang H, VanValkenburgh C, Chen X, Mullins C, Van Kaer L, Green N, Fang H. 2003. Genetic complementation in yeast reveals functional similarities between the catalytic subunits of mammalian signal peptidase complex. J Biol Chem 278:50932–50939
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liao S, Lin J, Do H, Johnson AE. 1997. Both lumenal and cytosolic gating of the aqueous ER translocon pore are regulated from inside the ribosome during membrane protein integration. Cell 90:31–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lill R, Dowhan W, Wickner W. 1990. The ATPase activity of SecA is regulated by acidic phospholipids, SecY, and the leader and mature domains of precursor proteins. Cell 60:271–280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lithgow T, Waksman G. 2013. Seaside transportation – from structure to function of translocation machines. EMBO Rep 14:585–587
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loibl M, Wunderle L, Hutzler J, Schulz BL, Aebi M, Strahl S. 2014. Protein O-mannosyltransferases associate with the translocon to modify translocating polypeptide chains. J Biol Chem 289:8599–8611
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luirink J, High S, Wood H, Giner A, Tollervey D, Dobberstein B. 1992. Signal sequence recognition by an Escherichia coli ribonucleoprotein complex. Nature 359:741–743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luirink J, ten Hagen-Jongman CM, van der Weijden CC, Oudega B, High S, Dobberstein B, Kusters R. 1994. An alternative protein targeting pathway in Escherichia coli: studies on the role of ftsY. EMBO J 13:2289–2296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lütcke H, High S, Römisch K, Ashford A, Dobberstein B. 1992. The methionine-rich domain of the 54 kDa subunit of signal recognition particle is sufficient for the interaction with signal sequences. EMBO J 11:1543–1551
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lycklama a Nijeholt JA, de Keyzer J, Prabudiansyah I, Driessen AJM. 2013. Characterization of the supporting role of SecE in protein translocation. FEBS Lett 587:3083–3088
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lyman SK, Schekman R. 1995. Interaction between BiP and Sec63p is required for the completion of protein translocation into the ER of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 131:1163–1171
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lyman SK, Schekman R. 1997. Binding of secretory precursor polypeptides to a translocon subcomplex is regulated by BiP. Cell 88:85–96
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macfarlane J, Muller M. 1995. The functional integration of a polytopic membrane protein of Escherichia coli is dependent on the bacterial signal-recognition particle. Eur J Biochem 233:766–771
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mades A, Gotthardt K, Awe K, Stieler J, Döring T, Füser S, Prange R. 2012. Role of human Sec63 in modulating the steady-state levels of multi-spanning membrane proteins. PLoS One 7:e49243
   Google Scholar
• Maillard AP, Lalani S, Silva F, Belin D, Duong F. 2007. Deregulation of the SecYEG translocation channel upon removal of the plug domain. J Biol Chem 282:1281–1287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martoglio B, Hofmann MW, Brunner J, Dobberstein B. 1995. The protein-conducting channel in the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum is open laterally toward the lipid bilayer. Cell 81:207–214
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matern Y, Barion B, Behrens-Kneip S. 2010. PpiD is a player in the network of periplasmic chaperones in Escherichia coli. BMC Microbiol 10:251
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matlack KES, Misselwitz B, Plath K, Rapoport TA. 1999. BiP acts as a molecular ratchet during posttranslational transport of prepro-α factor across the ER membrane. Cell 97:553–564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ménétret J-F, Hegde RS, Heinrich SU, Chandramouli P, Ludtke SJ, Rapoport TA, Akey CW. 2005. Architecture of the ribosome-channel complex derived from native membranes. J Mol Biol 348:445–457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ménétret J-F, Schaletzky J, Clemons WM, Osborne AR, Skånland SS, Denison C, et al. 2007. Ribosome binding of a single copy of the SecY complex: Implications for protein translocation. Mol Cell 28:1083–1092
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ménétret JF, Hegde RS, Aguiar M, Gygi SP, Park E, Rapoport TA, et al. 2008. Single copies of Sec61 and TRAP associate with a nontranslating mammalian ribosome. Structure 16:1126–1137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merdanovic M, Clausen T, Kaiser M, Huber R, Ehrmann M. 2011. Protein quality control in the bacterial periplasm. Annul Rev Microbiol 65:149–168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer H-A, Grau H, Kraft R, Kostka S, Prehn S, Kalies K-U, Hartmann E. 2000. Mammalian Sec61 is associated with Sec62 and Sec63. J Biol Chem 275:14550–14557
   Google Scholar
• Mikhaleva NI, Golovastov VV, Zolov SN, Bogdanov MV, Dowhan W, Nesmeyanova MA. 2001. Depletion of phosphatidylethanolamine affects secretion of Escherichia coli alkaline phosphatase and its transcriptional expression. FEBS Lett 493:85–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller JD, Bernstein HD, Walter P. 1994. Interaction of E. coli Ffh/4.5S ribonucleoprotein and FtsY mimics that of mammalian signal recognition particle and its receptor. Nature 367:657–659
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Millman JS, Qi HY, Vulcu F, Bernstein HD, Andrews DW. 2001. FtsY binds to the Escherichia coli inner membrane via interactions with phosphatidylethanolamine and membrane proteins. J Biol Chem 276:25982–25989
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mircheva M, Boy D, Weiche B, Hucke F, Graumann P, Koch HG. 2009. Predominant membrane localization is an essential feature of the bacterial signal recognition particle receptor. BMC Biol 7:76
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Missiakas D, Betton J-M, Raina S. 1996. New components of protein folding in extracytoplasmic compartments of Escherichia coli SurA, FkpA and Skp/OmpH. Mol Microbiol 21:871–884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra K, Schaffitzel C, Shaikh T, Tama F, Jenni S, Brooks CL, et al. 2005. Structure of the E. coli protein-conducting channel bound to a translating ribosome. Nature 438:318–324
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montero Llopis P, Jackson AF, Sliusarenko O, Surovtsev I, Heinritz J, Emonet T, Jacobs-Wagner C. 2010. Spatial organization of the flow of genetic information in bacteria. Nature 466:77–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori H, Ito K. 2006. Different modes of SecY-SecA interactions revealed by site-directed in vivo photo-cross-linking. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:16159–16164
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morita K, Tokuda H, Nishiyama K-i. 2012. Multiple SecA molecules drive protein translocation across a single translocon with SecG inversion. J Biol Chem 287:455–464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser M, Nagamori S, Huber M, Tokuda H, Nishiyama K-i. 2013. Glycolipozyme MPIase is essential for topology inversion of SecG during preprotein translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:9734–9739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller L, de Escauriaza MD, Lajoie P, Theis M, Jung M, Müller A, et al. 2010. Evolutionary gain of function for the ER membrane protein Sec62 from yeast to humans. Mol Cell Biol 21:691–703
   Google Scholar
• Müller M, Koch HG, Beck K, Schafer U. 2001. Protein traffic in bacteria: Multiple routes from the ribosome to and across the membrane. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 66:107–157
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nagamori S, Smirnova IN, Kaback HR. 2004. Role of YidC in folding of polytopic membrane proteins. J Cell Biol 165:53–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakashima K, Ishida H, Nakatomi A, Yazawa M. 2012. Specific conformation and Ca2+-binding mode of yeast calmodulin: Insight into evolutionary development. J Bacteriol 152:27–35
   Google Scholar
• Nam S-E, Paetzel M. 2013. Structure of signal peptide peptidase A with C-termini bound in the active sites: Insights into specificity, self-processing, and regulation. Biochemistry 52:8811–8822
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neumann-Haefelin C, Schafer U, Muller M, Koch HG. 2000. SRP-dependent co-translational targeting and SecA-dependent translocation analyzed as individual steps in the export of a bacterial protein. EMBO J 19:6419–6426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevo-Dinur K, Nussbaum-Shochat A, Ben-Yehuda S, Amster-Choder O. 2011. Translation-independent localization of mRNA in E. coli. Science 331:1081–1084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng DT, Brown JD, Walter P. 1996. Signal sequences specify the targeting route to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. J Cell Biol 134:269–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicchitta CV, Blobel G. 1993. Lumenal proteins of the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum are required to complete protein translocation. Cell 73:989–998
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsson I, Ohvo-Rekila H, Slotte JP, Johnson AE, von Heijne G. 2001. Inhibition of protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane by sterols. J Biol Chem 276:41748–41754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishiyama K-i, Suzuki T, Tokuda H. 1996. Inversion of the membrane topology of SecG coupled with SecA-dependent preprotein translocation. Cell 85:71–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nishiyama K, Hanada M, Tokuda H. 1994. Disruption of the gene encoding p12 (SecG) reveals the direct involvement and important function of SecG in the protein translocation of Escherichia coli at low temperature. EMBO J 13:3272–3277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishiyama K, Maeda M, Yanagisawa K, Nagase R, Komura H, Iwashita T, et al. 2012. MPIase is a glycolipozyme essential for membrane protein integration. Nat Commun 3:1260
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nohara T, Nakai M, Goto A, Endo T. 1995. Isolation and characterization of the cDNA for pea chloroplast SecA. Evolutionary conservation of the bacterial-type SecA-dependent protein transport within chloroplasts. FEBS Lett 364:305–308
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nothaft H, Szymanski CM. 2010. Protein glycosylation in bacteria: Sweeter than ever. Nat Rev Miocobiol 8:765–778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouwen N, de Kruijff B, Tommassen J. 1996. ΔμH+ dependency of in vitro protein translocation into Escherichia coli inner-membrane vesicles varies with the signal-sequence core-region composition. Mol Microbiol 19:1205–1214
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nouwen N, Driessen AJM. 2002. SecDFyajC forms a heterotetrameric complex with YidC. Mol Microbiol 44:1397–1405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyathi Y, Wilkinson BM, Pool MR. 2013. Co-translational targeting and translocation of proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochim Biophys Acta 1833:2392–2402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil K, DeGrado WF. 1990. How calmodulin binds its targets: Sequence independent recognition of amphiphilic alpha-helices. Trends Biochem Sci 15:59–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogg SC, Poritz MA, Walter P. 1992. Signal recognition particle receptor is important for cell growth and protein secretion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 3:895–911
   Google Scholar
• Ogg SC, Walter P. 1995. SRP samples nascent chains for the presence of signal sequences by interacting with ribosomes at a discrete step during translation elongation. Cell 81:1075–1084
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oh E, Becker AH, Sandikci A, Nichols RJ, Typas A, Gross CA, et al. 2011. Selective ribosome profiling reveals the cotranslational chaperone action of trigger factor in vivo. Cell 147:1295–1308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öjemalm K, Botelho SC, Stüdle C, von Heijne G. 2013. Quantitative analysis of SecYEG-mediated insertion of transmembrane α-helices into the bacterial inner membrane. J Mol Biol 425:2813–2822
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Öjemalm K, Halling KK, Nilsson I, von Heijne G. 2012. Orientational preferences of neighboring helices can drive ER insertion of a marginally hydrophobic transmembrane helix. Mol Cell 45:529–540
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oliver DB, Beckwith J. 1981. E. coli mutant pleiotropically defective in the export of secreted proteins. Cell 25:765–772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne AR, Rapoport TA. 2007. Protein translocation is mediated by oligomers of the SecY complex with one SecY copy forming the channel. Cell 129:97–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne R, Silhavy TJ. 1993. PrlA suppressor mutations cluster in regions corresponding to three distinct topological domains. EMBO J 12:3391–3398
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paetzel M, Dalbey RE, Strynadka NCJ. 1998. Crystal structure of a bacterial signal peptidase in complex with a [beta]-lactam inhibitor. Nature 396:186–190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palacios IM. 2007. How does an mRNA find its way? Intracellular localisation of transcripts. Semin Cell Develop Biol 18:163–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer T, Berks BC. 2012. The twin-arginine translocation (Tat) protein export pathway. Nat Rev Miocobiol 10:483–496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panzner S, Dreier L, Hartmann E, Kostka S, Rapoport TA. 1995. Posttranslational protein transport in yeast reconstituted with a purified complex of Sec proteins and Kar2p. Cell 81:561–570
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papanikou E, Karamanou S, Economou A. 2007. Bacterial protein secretion through the translocase nanomachine. Nat Rev Miocobiol 5:839–851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park E, Ménétret J-F, Gumbart JC, Ludtke SJ, Li W, Whynot A, et al. 2014. Structure of the SecY channel during initiation of protein translocation. Nature 506:102–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park E, Rapoport TA. 2012. Mechanisms of Sec61/SecY-mediated protein translocation across membranes. Annu Rev Biophys 41:21–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parlitz R, Eitan A, Stjepanovic G, Bahari L, Bange G, Bibi E, Sinning I. 2007. Escherichia coli signal recognition particle receptor FtsY contains an essential and autonomous membrane-binding amphipathic helix. J Biol Chem 282:32176–32184
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pfeffer S, Brandt F, Hrabe T, Lang S, Eibauer M, Zimmermann R, Förster F. 2012. Structure and 3D arrangement of endoplasmic reticulum membrane-associated ribosomes. Structure 20:1508–1518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer S, Dudek J, Gogala M, Schorr S, Linxweiler J, Lang S, et al. 2014. Structure of the mammalian oligosaccharyl-transferase complex in the native ER protein translocon. Nat Commun 5:3072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plath K, Mothes W, Wilkinson BM, Stirling CJ, Rapoport TA. 1998. Signal sequence recognition in posttranslational protein transport across the yeast ER membrane. Cell 94:795–807
   Google Scholar
• Plath K, Wilkinson BM, Stirling CJ, Rapoport TA. 2004. Interactions between Sec complex and prepro-alpha-factor during posttranslational protein transport into the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Cell Biol 15:1–10
   Google Scholar
• Pogliano JA, Beckwith J. 1994. SecD and SecF facilitate protein export in Escherichia coli. EMBO J 13:554–561
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pohlschröder M, Hartmann E, Hand NJ, Dilks K, Haddad A. 2005. Diversity and evolution of protein translocation. Annu Rev Microbiol 59:91–111
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pool MR. 2009. A trans-membrane segment inside the ribosome exit tunnel triggers RAMP4 recruitment to the Sec61p translocase. J Cell Biol 185:889–902
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poritz M, Bernstein H, Strub K, Zopf D, Wilhelm H, Walter P. 1990. An E. coli ribonucleoprotein containing 4.5S RNA resembles mammalian signal recognition particle. Science 250:1111–1117
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poritz MA, Siegel V, Hansen W, Walter P. 1988a. Small ribonucleoproteins in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Yarrowia lipolytica homologous to signal recognition particle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:4315–4319
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poritz MA, Strub K, Walter P. 1988b. Human SRP RNA and E. coli 4.5S RNA contain a highly homologous structural domain. Cell 55:4–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Potter MD, Nicchitta CV. 2000. Regulation of ribosome detachment from the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum membrane. J Biol Chem 275:33828–33835
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Potter MD, Nicchitta CV. 2002. Endoplasmic reticulum-bound ribosomes reside in stable association with the translocon following termination of protein synthesis. J Biol Chem 277:23314–23320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers T, Walter P. 1997. Co-translational protein targeting catalyzed by the Escherichia coli signal recognition particle and its receptor. EMBO J 16:4880–4886
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prilusky J, Bibi E. 2009. Studying membrane proteins through the eyes of the genetic code revealed a strong uracil bias in their coding mRNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:6662–6666
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prinz A, Behrens C, Rapoport TA, Hartmann E, Kalies K-UU. 2000. Evolutionarily conserved binding of ribosomes to the translocation channel via the large ribosomal RNA. EMBO J 19:1900–1906
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raden D, Song W, Gilmore R. 2000. Role of the cytoplasmic segments of Sec61α in the ribosome-binding and translocation-promoting activities of the Sec61 complex. J Cell Biol 150:53–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raetz CR. 1978. Enzymology, genetics, and regulation of membrane phospholipid synthesis in Escherichia coli. Microbiol Rev 42:614–659
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Randall LL, Hardy SJS. 1977. Synthesis of exported proteins by membrane-bound polysomes from Escherichia coli. Eur J Biochem 75:43–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Randall LL, Topping TB, Smith VF, Diamond DL, Hardy SJ 1998. SecB: A chaperone from Escherichia coli. Methods Enzymol 290:444–459
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rapiejko PJ, Gilmore R. 1997. Empty site forms of the SRP54 and SR alpha GTPases mediate targeting of ribosome-nascent chain complexes to the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell 89:703–713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp M, Granseth E, Seppälä S, von Heijne G. 2006. Identification and evolution of dual-topology membrane proteins. Nat Struct Mol Biol 13:112–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raue U, Oellerer S, Rospert S. 2007. Association of protein biogenesis factors at the yeast ribosomal tunnel exit is affected by the translational status and nascent polypeptide sequence. J Biol Chem 282:7809–7816
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reid DW, Nicchitta CV. 2012. Primary role for endoplasmic reticulum-bound ribosomes in cellular translation identified by ribosome profiling. J Biol Chem 287:5518–5527
   Google Scholar
• Reithinger JH, Kim JEH, Kim H. 2013. Sec62 protein mediates membrane insertion and orientation of moderately hydrophobic signal anchor proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). J Biol Chem 288:18058–18067
   Google Scholar
• Rensing SA, Maier UG. 1994. The SecY protein family: Comparative analysis and phylogenetic relationships. Mol Phylogen Evol 3:187–191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietveld AG, Koorengevel MC, de Kruijff B. 1995. Non-bilayer lipids are required for efficient protein transport across the plasma membrane of Escherichia coli. EMBO J 14:5506–5513
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Römisch K, Ribes V, High S, Lütcke H, Tollervey D, Dobberstein B. 1990. Structure and function of signal recognition particle (SRP). Mol Biol Rep 14:71–72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sääf A, Andersson H, Gafvelin G, Heijnet Gv. 2009. SecA-dependence of the translocation of a large periplasmic loop in the Escherichia coli MalF inner membrane protein is a function of sequence context. Mol Membr Biol 12:209–215
   Google Scholar
• Sachelaru I, Petriman NA, Kudva R, Kuhn P, Welte T, Knapp B, et al. 2013. YidC occupies the lateral gate of the SecYEG translocon and is sequentially displaced by a nascent membrane protein. J Biol Chem 288:16295–16307
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sadlish H, Pitonzo D, Johnson AE, Skach WR. 2005. Sequential triage of transmembrane segments by Sec61alpha during biogenesis of a native multispanning membrane protein. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12:870–878
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Samuelson JC, Jiang F, Yi L, Chen M, de Gier JW, Kuhn A, Dalbey RE. 2001. Function of YidC for the insertion of M13 procoat protein in Escherichia coli: Translocation of mutants that show differences in their membrane potential dependence and Sec requirement. J Biol Chem 276:34847–34852
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandikci A, Gloge F, Martinez M, Mayer MP, Wade R, Bukau B, Kramer G. 2013. Dynamic enzyme docking to the ribosome coordinates N-terminal processing with polypeptide folding. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:843–850
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Satoh Y, Matsumoto G, Mori H, Ito K. 2003. Nearest neighbor analysis of the SecYEG complex. 1. Identification of a SecY-SecG interface. Biochemistry 42:7434–7441
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saurí A, McCormick PJ, Johnson AE, Mingarro I. 2007. Sec61α and TRAM are sequentially adjacent to a nascent viral membrane protein during its ER integration. J Mol Biol 366:366–374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachter H, Freeze HH. 2009. Glycosylation diseases: Quo vadis? Biochim Biophys Acta 1792:925–930
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schäfer U, Beck K, Müller M. 1999. Skp, a molecular chaperone of gram-negative bacteria, is required for the formation of soluble periplasmic intermediates of outer membrane proteins. J Biol Chem 274:24567–24574
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schaffitzel C, Oswald M, Berger I, Ishikawa T, Abrahams JP, Koerten HK, et al. 2006. Structure of the E. coli signal recognition particle bound to a translating ribosome. Nature 444:503–506
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schaletzky J, Rapoport TA. 2006. Ribosome binding to and dissociation from translocation sites of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Mol Cell Biol 17:3860–3869
   Google Scholar
• Schatz PJ, Beckwith J. 1990. Genetic analysis of protein export in Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Genet 24:215–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatz PJ, Bieker KL, Ottemann KM, Silhavy TJ, Beckwith J. 1991. One of three transmembrane stretches is sufficient for the functioning of the SecE protein, a membrane component of the E. coli secretion machinery. EMBO J 10:1749–1757
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schäuble N, Lang S, Jung M, Cappel S, Schorr S, Ulucan Ö, et al. 2012. BiP-mediated closing of the Sec61 channel limits Ca2+ leakage from the ER. EMBO J 31:3282–3296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiebel E, Driessen AJM, Hartl F-U, Wickner W. 1991. µH+ and ATP function at different steps of the catalytic cycle of preprotein translocase. Cell 64:927–939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlenker O, Hendricks A, Sinning I, Wild K. 2006. The structure of the mammalian signal recognition particle (SRP) receptor as prototype for the interaction of small GTPases with Longin domains. J Biol Chem 281:8898–8906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlünzen F, Wilson DN, Tian P, Harms JM, McInnes SJ, Hansen HA, et al. 2005. The binding mode of the trigger factor on the ribosome: implications for protein folding and SRP interaction. Structure 13:1685–1694
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schröder K, Martoglio B, Hofmann M, Holscher C, Hartmann E, Prehn S, et al. 1999. Control of glycosylation of MHC class II-associated invariant chain by translocon-associated RAMP4. EMBO J 18:4804–4815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz T, Blobel G. 2003. Structural basis for the function of the β subunit of the eukaryotic signal recognition particle receptor. Cell 112:793–803
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwarz F, Aebi M. 2011. Mechanisms and principles of N-linked protein glycosylation. Curr Opin Struct Biol 21:576–582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitl I, Wickles S, Beckmann R, Kuhn A, Kiefer D. 2013. The C-terminal regions of YidC from Rhodopirellula baltica and Oceanicaulis alexandrii bind to ribosomes and partially substitute for SRP receptor function in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 91:408–421
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shao S, Hegde RS. 2011. Membrane protein insertion at the endoplasmic reticulum. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 27:25–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw AS, Rottier PJ, Rose JK. 1988. Evidence for the loop model of signal-sequence insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:7592–7596
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shibatani T, David LL, McCormack AL, Frueh K, Skach WR. 2005. Proteomic analysis of mammalian oligosaccharyltransferase reveals multiple subcomplexes that contain Sec61, TRAP, and two potential new subunits. Biochemistry 44:5982–5992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiozuka K, Tani K, Mizushima S, Tokuda H. 1990. The proton motive force lowers the level of ATP required for the in vitro translocation of a secretory protein in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 265:18843–18847
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siegel V, Walter P. 1985. Elongation arrest is not a prerequisite for secretory protein translocation across the microsomal membrane. J Cell Biol 100:1913–1921
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siegel V, Walter P. 1986. Removal of the Alu structural domain from signal recognition particle leaves its protein translocation activity intact. Nature 320:81–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skowronek MH, Rotter M, Haas IG. 1999. Molecular characterization of a novel mammalian DnaJ-like Sec63p homolog. Biol Chem 380:1133–1138
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith MA, Clemons WM, DeMars CJ, Flower AM. 2005. Modeling the effects of prl mutations on the Escherichia coli SecY complex. J Bacteriol 187:6454–6465
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sommer N, Junne T, Kalies KU, Spiess M, Hartmann E. 2013. TRAP assists membrane protein topogenesis at the mammalian ER membrane. Biochim Biophys Acta 1833:3104–3111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song W, Raden D, Mandon EC, Gilmore R. 2000. Role of Sec61α in the regulated transfer of the ribosome-nascent chain complex from the signal recognition particle to the translocation channel. Cell 100:333–343
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soromani C, Zeng N, Hollemeyer K, Heinzle E, Klein M-C, Tretter T, et al. 2012. N-acetylation and phosphorylation of Sec complex subunits in the ER membrane. BMC Cell Biol 13:34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stephens SB, Dodd RD, Brewer JW, Lager PJ, Keene JD, Nicchitta CV. 2005. Stable ribosome binding to the endoplasmic reticulum enables compartment-specific regulation of mRNA translation. Mol Cell Biol 16:5819–5831
   Google Scholar
• Sugai R, Takemae K, Tokuda H, Nishiyama K-i. 2007. Topology inversion of SecG is essential for cytosolic SecA-dependent stimulation of protein translocation. J Biol Chem 282:29540–29548
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tai VW, Imperiali B. 2001. Substrate specificity of the glycosyl donor for oligosaccharyl transferase. J Org Chem 66:6217–6228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamborero S, Vilar M, Martinez-Gil L, Johnson AE, Mingarro I. 2011. Membrane insertion and topology of the translocating chain-associating membrane protein (TRAM). J Mol Biol 406:571–582
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terzi L, Pool MR, Dobberstein B, Strub K. 2004. Signal recognition particle Alu domain occupies a defined site at the ribosomal subunit interface upon signal sequence recognition. Biochemistry 43:107–117
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tian H, Beckwith J. 2002. Genetic screen yields mutations in genes encoding all known components of the Escherichia coli signal recognition particle pathway. J Bacteriol 184:111–118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tjalsma H, Bolhuis A, van Roosmalen ML, Wiegert T, Schumann W, Broekhuizen CP, et al. 1998. Functional analysis of the secretory precursor processing machinery of Bacillus subtilis: Identification of a eubacterial homolog of archaeal and eukaryotic signal peptidases. Genes Develop 12:2318–2331
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomkiewicz D, Nouwen N, Driessen AJM. 2007. Pushing, pulling and trapping – modes of motor protein supported protein translocation. FEBS Lett 581:2820–2828
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomkiewicz D, Nouwen N, van Leeuwen R, Tans S, Driessen AJM. 2006. SecA supports a constant rate of preprotein translocation. J Biol Chem 281:15709–15713
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tong J, Dolezal P, Selkrig J, Crawford S, Simpson AGB, Noinaj N, et al. 2011. Ancestral and derived protein import pathways in the mitochondrion of Reclinomonas americana. Mol Biol Evol 28:1581–1591
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Träger C, Rosenblad MA, Ziehe D, Garcia-Petit C, Schrader L, Kock K, et al. 2012. Evolution from the prokaryotic to the higher plant chloroplast signal recognition particle: The signal recognition particle RNA is conserved in plastids of a wide range of photosynthetic organisms. Plant Cell 24:4819–4836
   Google Scholar
• Tseng TT, Gratwick KS, Kollman J, Park D, Nies DH, Goffeau A, Saier MH. 1999. The RND permease superfamily: An ancient, ubiquitous and diverse family that includes human disease and development proteins. J Mol MicroBio Biotechnol 1:107–125
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsukazaki T, Mori H, Echizen Y, Ishitani R, Fukai S, Tanaka T, et al. 2011. Structure and function of a membrane component SecDF that enhances protein export. Nature 474:235–238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsukazaki T, Mori H, Fukai S, Ishitani R, Mori T, Dohmae N, et al. 2008. Conformational transition of Sec machinery inferred from bacterial SecYE structures. Nature 455:988–991
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyedmers J, Lerner M, Bies C, Dudek J, Skowronek MH, Haas IG, et al. 2000. Homologs of the yeast Sec complex subunits Sec62p and Sec63p are abundant proteins in dog pancreas microsomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:7214–7219
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyedmers J, Lerner M, Wiedmann M, Volkmer J, Zimmermann R. 2003. Polypeptide-binding proteins mediate completion of co-translational protein translocation into the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO Rep 4:505–510
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyson JR, Stirling CJ. 2000. LHS1 and SIL1 provide a lumenal function that is essential for protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO J 19:6440–6452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullers RS, Houben EN, Raine A, ten Hagen-Jongman CM, Ehrenberg M, Brunner J, et al. 2003. Interplay of signal recognition particle and trigger factor at L23 near the nascent chain exit site on the Escherichia coli ribosome. J Cell Biol 161:679–684
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Urbanus ML, Scotti PA, Froderberg L, Saaf A, de Gier JW, Brunner J, et al. 2001. Sec-dependent membrane protein insertion: sequential interaction of nascent FtsQ with SecY and YidC. EMBO Rep 2:524–529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valencia-Burton M, McCullough RM, Cantor CR, Broude NE. 2007. RNA visualization in live bacterial cells using fluorescent protein complementation. Nat Meth 4:421–427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valent Q, Kendall D, High S, Kusters R, Oudega B, Luirink J. 1995. Early events in preprotein recognition in E. coli: interaction of SRP and trigger factor with nascent polypeptides. EMBO J 14:5494–5505
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valent QA, Scotti PA, High S, de Gier JW, von Heijne G, Lentzen G, et al. 1998. The Escherichia coli SRP and SecB targeting pathways converge at the translocon. EMBO J 17:2504–2512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bloois E, Dekker HL, Froderberg L, Houben EN, Urbanus ML, de Koster CG, et al. 2008. Detection of cross-links between FtsH, YidC, HflK/C suggests a linked role for these proteins in quality control upon insertion of bacterial inner membrane proteins. FEBS Lett 582:1419–1424
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Dalen A, de Kruijff B. 2004. The role of lipids in membrane insertion and translocation of bacterial proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta – Mol Cell Res 1694:97–109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Berg B, Clemons WM, Collinson I, Modis Y, Hartmann E, Harrison SC, Rapoport TA. 2004. X-ray structure of a protein-conducting channel. Nature 427:36–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Does C, Swaving J, van Klompenburg W, Driessen AJM. 2000. Non-bilayer lipids stimulate the activity of the reconstituted bacterial protein translocase. J Biol Chem 275:2472–2478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Laan M, Nouwen N, Driessen AJM. 2004. SecYEG proteoliposomes catalyze the Deltaphi-dependent membrane insertion of FtsQ. J Biol Chem 279:1659–1664
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Sluis EO, Driessen AJM. 2006. Stepwise evolution of the Sec machinery in proteobacteria. Trends Microbiol 14:105–108
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Sluis EO, Nouwen N, Driessen AJM. 2002. SecY–SecY and SecY–SecG contacts revealed by site-specific crosslinking. FEBS Lett 527:159–165
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Sluis EO, van der Vries E, Berrelkamp G, Nouwen N, Driessen AJM. 2006. Topologically fixed SecG is fully functional. J Bacteriol 188:1188–1190
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Meer G, Voelker DR, Feigenson GW. 2008. Membrane lipids: Where they are and how they behave. Nat Rev Mol Cell biol 9:112–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanValkenburgh C, Chen X, Mullins C, Fang H, Green N. 1999. The catalytic mechanism of endoplasmic reticulum signal peptidase appears to be distinct from most eubacterial signal peptidases. J Biol Chem 274:11519–11525
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vassylyev DG, Mori H, Vassylyeva MN, Tsukazaki T, Kimura Y, Tahirov TH, Ito K. 2006. Crystal structure of the translocation ATPase SecA from Thermus thermophilus reveals a parallel, head-to-head dimer. J Mol Biol 364:248–258
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vitrac H, Bogdanov M, Heacock P, Dowhan W. 2011. Lipids and topological rules of membrane protein assembly: balance between long and short range lipid-protein interactions. J Biol Chem 286:15182–15194
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von Heijne G. 1984. Analysis of the distribution of charged residues in the N-terminal region of signal sequences: Implications for protein export in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. EMBO J 3:2315–2318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Heijne G. 1985. Signal sequences. The limits of variation. J Mol Biol 184:99–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Heijne G. 1986. A new method for predicting signal sequence cleavage sites. Nucleic Acids Res 14:4683–4690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Heijne G. 1990. The signal peptide. J Membr Biol 115:195–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Heijne G, Gavel Y. 1988. Topogenic signals in integral membrane proteins. Eur J Biochem 174:671–678
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Voss M, Schröder B, Fluhrer R. 2013. Mechanism, specificity, and physiology of signal peptide peptidase (SPP) and SPP-like proteases. Biochim Biophys Acta – Biomembr 1828:2828–2839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter P, Blobel G. 1980. Purification of a membrane-associated protein complex required for protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:7112–7116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter P, Blobel G. 1981. Translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum III. Signal recognition protein (SRP) causes signal sequence-dependent and site-specific arrest of chain elongation that is released by microsomal membranes. J Cell Biol 91:557–561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter P, Blobel G. 1982. Signal recognition particle contains a 7S RNA essential for protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum. Nature 299:691–698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter P, Ibrahimi I, Blobel G. 1981. Translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum. I. Signal recognition protein (SRP) binds to in-vitro-assembled polysomes synthesizing secretory protein. J Cell Biol 91:545–550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Dobberstein B. 1999. Oligomeric complexes involved in translocation of proteins across the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum. FEBS Lett 457:316–322
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang P, Shim E, Cravatt B, Jacobsen R, Schoeniger J, Kim AC, et al. 2008. Escherichia coli signal peptide peptidase A is a serine-lysine protease with a lysine recruited to the nonconserved amino-terminal domain in the S49 protease family. Biochemistry 47:6361–6369
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watanabe M, Blobel G. 1989. SecB functions as a cytosolic signal recognition factor for protein export in E. coli. Cell 58:695–705
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiche B, Bürk J, Angelini S, Schiltz E, Thumfart JO, Koch HG. 2008. A cleavable N-terminal membrane anchor is involved in membrane binding of the Escherichia coli SRP receptor. J Mol Biol 377:761–773
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Welte T, Kudva R, Kuhn P, Sturm L, Braig D, Müller M, et al. 2012. Promiscuous targeting of polytopic membrane proteins to SecYEG or YidC by the Escherichia coli signal recognition particle. Mol Cell Biol 23:464–479
   Google Scholar
• Whitehouse S, Gold VAM, Robson A, Allen WJ, Sessions RB, Collinson I. 2012. Mobility of the SecA 2-helix-finger is not essential for polypeptide translocation via the SecYEG complex. J Cell Biol 199:919–929
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wild K, Sinning I, Cusack S. 2001. Crystal structure of an early protein-RNA assembly complex of the signal recognition particle. Science 294:598–601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth A, Jung M, Bies C, Frien M, Tyedmers J, Zimmermann R, Wagner R. 2003. The Sec61p complex is a dynamic precursor activated channel. Mol Cell 12:261–268
   Google Scholar
• Wittke S, Dunnwald M, Johnsson N. 2000. Sec62p, a component of the endoplasmic reticulum protein translocation machinery, contains multiple binding sites for the Sec-complex. Mol Cell Biol 11:3859–3871
   Google Scholar
• Wu ZC, de Keyzer J, Kedrov A, Driessen AJM. 2012. Competitive binding of the SecA ATPase and ribosomes to the SecYEG translocon. J Biol Chem 287:7885–7895
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xing L, Bassell GJ. 2013. mRNA localization: An orchestration of assembly, traffic and synthesis. Traffic 14:2–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Knafels JD, Yoshino K. 2000. Crystal structure of the bacterial protein export chaperone SecB. Nat Struct Mol Biol 7:1172–1177
   Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi A, Hori O, Stern DM, Hartmann E, Ogawa S, Tohyama M. 1999. Stress-associated endoplasmic reticulum protein 1 (Serp1)/ribosome-associated membrane protein 4 (Ramp4) stabilizes membrane proteins during stress and facilitates subsequent glycosylation. J Cell Biol 147:1195–1204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto H, Fujita H, Kida Y, Sakaguchi M. 2012. Pleiotropic effects of membrane cholesterol upon translocation of protein across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Biochemistry 51:3596–3605
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamamoto H, Kida Y, Sakaguchi M. 2013. Phosphatidylserine-binding protein lactadherin inhibits protein translocation across the ER membrane. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 434:620–626
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young BP. 2001. Sec63p and Kar2p are required for the translocation of SRP-dependent precursors into the yeast endoplasmic reticulum in vivo. EMBO J 20:262–271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan J, Zweers J, Dijl J, Dalbey R. 2010. Protein transport across and into cell membranes in bacteria and archaea. Cell Mol Life Sci 67:179–199
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zafar S, Nasir A, Bokhari H. 2011. Computational analysis reveals abundance of potential glycoproteins in Archaea, Bacteria and Eukarya. Bioinformation 6:352–355
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang X, Rashid R, Wang K, Shan So. 2010. Sequential checkpoints govern substrate selection during cotranslational protein targeting. Science 328:757–760
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang X, Schaffitzel C, Ban N, Shan S-o. 2009a. Multiple conformational switches in a GTPase complex control co-translational protein targeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:1754–1759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y-J, Tian H-F, Wen J-F. 2009b. The evolution of YidC/Oxa/Alb3 family in the three domains of life: A phylogenomic analysis. BMC Evol Biol 9:137
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao X, Jäntti J. 2009. Functional characterization of the trans-membrane domain interactions of the Sec61 protein translocation complex beta-subunit. BMC Cell Biol 10:76
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zheng N, Gierasch LM. 1997. Domain interactions in E. coli SRP: stabilization of M domain by RNA is required for effective signal sequence modulation of NG domain. Mol Cell 1:79–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Xue S, Yang JJ. 2013. Calciomics: Integrative studies of Ca2+-binding proteins and their interactomes in biological systems. Metallomics 5:29–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer J, Nam Y, Rapoport TA. 2008. Structure of a complex of the ATPase SecA and the protein-translocation channel. Nature 455:936–943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann R, Eyrisch S, Ahmad M, Helms V. 2011. Protein translocation across the ER membrane. Biochim Biophys Acta 1808:912–924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann R, Sagstetter M, Lewis M, Pelham HR. 1988. Seventy-kilodalton heat shock proteins and an additional component from reticulocyte lysate stimulate import of M13 procoat protein into microsomes. EMBO J 7:2875–2880
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zopf D, Bernstein H, Johnson A, Walter P. 1990. The methionine-rich domain of the 54 kd protein subunit of the signal recognition particle contains an RNA binding site and can be crosslinked to a signal sequence. EMBO J 9:4511–4517
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zopf D, Bernstein HD, Walter P. 1993. GTPase domain of the 54-kD subunit of the mammalian signal recognition particle is required for protein translocation but not for signal sequence binding. J Cell Biol 120:1113–1121
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zwieb C, Bhuiyan S. 2010. Archaea signal recognition particle shows the way. Archaea 2010:485051
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zwizinski C, Wickner W. 1980. Purification and characterization of leader (signal) peptidase from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 255:7973–7977
   PubMedGoogle Scholar