Agonist-induced displacement of quinacrine from its binding site on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: plausible agonist membrane partitioning mechanism

References

• Adams P. R. Voltage jump analysis of procaine action at frog endplate. Journal of Physiology 1977; 268: 291–318
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adams P. R., Feltz A. Quinacrine (mepacrine) action at frog endplate. Journal of Physiology 1980a; 306: 261–281
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adams P. R., Feltz A. Endplate channel opening and the kinetics of quinacrine blocks. Journal of Physiology 1980b; 306: 283–306
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adams P. R., Sakmann B. Decamethonium both opens and blocks endplate channels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 1978; 75: 2994–2998
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arias H. R. Luminal and non-luminal non-competitive inhibitor binding sites on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Molecular Membrane Biology 1996; 13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arias H. R., Johnson D. A. Differential agonist-induced displacement of quinacrine and ethidium from their respective histrionicotoxin-sensitive binding sites on the Torpedo acetylcholine receptor. Biochemistry 1995; 34: 1589–1595
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arias H. R., Sankaram M. B., Horvath L. I., Barrantes F. J., Marsh D. High affinity of negatively charged phospholipids but not gangliosides to the lipid-protein interface of the muscle-type nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Effect of local anaesthetics. Biochemistry 1996, in press
   Google Scholar
• Arias H. R., Valenzuela C. F., Johnson D. A. Transverse localization of the quinacrine binding site on the Torpedo acetylcholine receptor. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1993a; 268: 6348–6355
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arias H. R., Valenzuela C. F., Johnson D. A. Quinacrine and ethidium bind to different loci on the Torpedo acetylcholine receptor. Biochemistry 1993b; 32: 6237–6242
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Behling R. W., Jelinski L. W. Importance of the membrane in ligand-receptor interactions. Biochemical Pharmacology 1990; 40: 49–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Behling R. W., Yamane T., Navon G., Jelinski L. W. Conformation of acetylcholine bound to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 1988a; 85: 6721–6725
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Behling R. W., Yamane T., Navon G., Sammon M. J., Jelinski L. W. Measuring relative acetylcholine receptor agonist binding by selective proton nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation experiments. Biophysical Journal 1988b; 53: 947–995
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butler D. H., McNamee M. G. FTIR analysis of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor secondary structure in reconstituted membranes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1993; 1150: 17–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carter A. A., Oswald R. E. Channel blocking properties of a series of nicotinic cholinergic agonists. Biophysical Journal 1993; 65: 840–851
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charnet P., Labarca C., Leonard R. J., Vogelaar N. J., Czyzyk L., Gouin A., Davidson N., Lester H. A. An open channel blocker interacts with adjacent turns of α-helices in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Neuron 1990; 2: 87–95
   Google Scholar
• Cheng Y-C., Prusoff W. H. Relationship between the inhibition constant (Kl) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochemical Pharmacology 1973; 22: 3099–3108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquhoun D., Ogden D. C. Activation of ion channels in the frog endplate by high concentrations of acetylcholine. Journal of Physiology 1988; 395: 131–159
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox R. N., Kaldany R-R. J., Dipaola M., Karlin A. Time-resolved photolabelling by quinacrine azide of a noncompetitive inhibitor site of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in a transient, agonist-induced state. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1985; 260: 7186–7193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dipaola M., Kao P. N., Karlin A. Mapping, the α-subunit site photolabelled by the noncompetitive inhibitor [3H]quinacrine azide in the active state of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1990; 265: 11017–11029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty S. J., Berg J. C. Distribution equilibria in micellar solutions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 1974; 48: 110–121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyer E. B., Hasan F., Cohen S. G., Cohen J. B. Reaction of [3H]meproadifen mustard with membrane-bound Torpedo acetylcholine receptor. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1986; 261: 13727–13734
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eldefrawi A. T., Miller R. E., Eldefrawi M. E. Binding of depolarizing drugs to the ionic channel sites of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Biochemical Pharmacology 1982; 31: 1819–1822
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Encinas M. V., Lissi E. A. Evaluation of partition constants in compartmentalised systems from fluorescence quenching data. Chemical Physics Letters 1982; 91: 55–57
   Google Scholar
• Forman S. A., Firestone L. L., Miller K. W. Is agonist self-inhibition at the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor a nonespecific action. Biochemistry 1987; 26: 2807–2814
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forman S. A., Miller K. W. High acetylcholine concentrations cause rapid inactivation before fast desensitization in nicotinic acetylcholine receptors from Torpedo. Biophysical Journal 1988; 54: 149–158
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forman S. A., Miller K. W. Procaine rapidly inactivates acetylcholine receptors from Torpedo and competes with agonist for inhibition sites. Biochemistry 1989; 28: 1678–1685
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giraudat J., Dennis M., Heidmann T., Chang J. Y., Changeux J-P. Structure of the high-affinity binding site for noncompetitive blockers of the acetylcholine receptor: serine-262 of the δ subunit is labelled by [3H]chlorpromazine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 1986; 83: 2719–2723
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giraudat J., Dennis M., Heidmann T., Haumont P-Y., Lederer F., Changeux J-P. Structure of the high-affinity binding site for noncompetitive blockers of the acetylcholine receptor: [3H]chlorpromazine labels homologous residues in the β and δ-chains. Biochemistry 1987; 26: 2410–2418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraudat J., Galzi J-L, Revah F., Changeux J-P., Haumont P-Y., Lederer F. The noncompetitive blocker [3H]chlorpromazine labels segment M2 but not segment M1 of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha-subunit. FEBS Letters 1989; 253: 190–198
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• González-Ros J. M., Llanillo M., Paraschos A., Martínez-Carrión M. Lipid environment of acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica. Biochemistry 1982; 21: 3467–3470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green S. A., Simpson D. J., Zhou G., Ho P. S., Blough N. V. Intramolecular quenching of excited singlet states by stable nitroxyl radicals. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1990; 221: 7337–7346
   Google Scholar
• Grünhagen H-H., Iwatsubo M., Changeux J-P. Fast kinetic studies on the interaction of cholinergic agonists with the membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo marmorata as revealed by quinacrine fluorescence. European Journal of Biochemistry 1977; 80: 225–242
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herz J. M., Atherton S. J. Steric factors limit access to the noncompetitive inhibitor site of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Biophysical Journal 1992; 62: 74–76
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herz J. M., Johnson D. A., Taylor P. Distance between the agonist and noncompetitive inhibitor sites on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1989; 264: 12439–12448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herz J. M., Kolb S. J., Erlinger T., Schmid E. Channel permeant cations compete selectively with noncompetitive inhibitors of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1991; 266: 16691–16698
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hucho F., Oberthür W., Lottspeich F. The ion channel of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor is formed by the homologous helices MII of the receptor subunit. FEBS Letters 1986; 205: 137–142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson D. A., Nuss J. M. The histrionicotoxin-sensitive ethidium binding site is located outside of the transmembrane domain of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. A fluorescence study. Biochemistry 1994; 33: 9070–9077
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson D. A., Yguerabide J. Solute accessibility to Nf-fluorescein isothiocyanate-lysine-23 cobra α-toxin bound to the acetylcholine receptor. A consideration of the effect of rotational diffusion and orientation constraints on fluorescence quenching. Biophysical Journal 1985; 48: 949–955
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karlin A. Exploration of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. The Harvey Lectures, Series 1991; 85: 71–107
   Google Scholar
• Karlin A. Structure of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1993; 3: 299–309
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuffler S. W., Yoshikamo D. The number transmitter molecules in a quantum: an estimate from iontophoretic application of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular synapse. Journal of Physiology 1975; 251: 465–482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard R. J., Labarca C. G., Charnet P., Davidson N., Lester H. A. Evidence that the M2 membrane-spanning region lines the ion channel pore of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Science 1988; 242: 1578–1581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester H. A. The permeation pathway of neurotransmitter-gated ion channels. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure 1992; 21: 267–292
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lissi E., Bianconi M. L., Do Amaral A. T., De Paula E., Blanch L. E. B., Schreier S. Methods for the determination of partition coefficients based on the effect of solutes upon membrane structure. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1990; 1021: 46–50
   Google Scholar
• Magleby K. L., Stevens C. F. A quantitative description of endplate currents. Journal of Physiology 1972; 223: 173–197
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marquardt D. W. Solution of non-linear chemical engineering models. Chemical Engineering Progress 1959; 55: 65–70
   Google Scholar
• Marshall C. G., Ogden D., Colquhoun D. Activation of ion channels in the frog endplate by several analogues of acetylcholine. Journal of Physiology 1991; 433: 73–93
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matko J., Ohki K., Edidin M. Luminiscence quenching by nitroxide spin labels in aqueous solutions: studies on the mechanism of quenching. Biochemistry 1992; 31: 703–711
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neher E., Steinbach J. H. Local anaesthetics transiently block currents through single acetylcholine-receptor channels. Journal of Physiology 1978; 277: 153–176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman G. C., Huang C-H. Structural studies on phosphatidylcholine-cholesterol mixed vesicles. Biochemistry 1975; 14: 3363–3370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu L., Hess G. P. An acetylcholine receptor regulatory site in BC3H-1 cells: characterized by laser-pulse photolysis in the microsecond-to-millisend time region. Biochemistry 1993; 32: 3831–3835
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oberthür W., Mühn P., Baumann H., Lottspeich F., Wittmann-Liebold B., Hucho F. The reaction site of a noncompetitive antagonist in the δ subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. The EMBO Journal 1986; 5: 1815–1819
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ochoa E. L. M., Chattopadhyay A., McNamee M. G. Desensitization of the nicotinic receptor: molecular mechanism and effect of modulators. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology 1989; 9: 141–178
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ogden D. C., Colquhoun D. Ion channel block by acetylcholine, carbachol and suberyldicholine at the frog neuromuscular junction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 1985; 225: 329–355
   Google Scholar
• Pasquale E. B., Takeyasu K., Udgaonkar J. B., Cash D. J., Severski M. C., Hess G. P. Acetylcholine receptor: evidence for a regulatory binding site in investigations of suberyldicholine-induced transmembrane ion flux in Electrophorus electricus membrane vesicles. Biochemistry 1983; 22: 5967–5973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen S. E., Sharp S. D., Liu W-S., Cohen J. B. Structure of the non-competitive antagonist-binding site of the Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. [3H]Meproadifen mustard reacts selectively with α-subunit Glu-262. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1992; 267: 10489–10499
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peper K., Bradley R. J., Dreyer F. The acetylcholine receptor at the neuromuscular junction. Physiological Reviews 1982; 62: 1271–1340
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raines D. E., Cafiso D. S. Potential-dependent phase partitioning of fluorescent hydrophobic ions in phospholipid vesicles. Journal of Membrane Biology 1984; 82: 241–247
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Revah F., Galzi J. L., Giraudat J., Haumont P-Y., Lederer F., Changeux J-P. The noncompetitive blocker [3H]chlorpromazine labels three amino acids of the acetylcholine receptor δ subunit: implications for the α-helical organization of regions MII and for the structure of the ion channel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 1990; 87: 4675–4679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes D. G., Sarmiento J. G., Herbette L. G. Kinetics of binding of membrane-active drugs to receptor sites. Molecular Pharmacology 1985; 27: 612–623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiono S., Takeyasu K., Udgaonkar J. B., Delcour A. H., Fujita N., Hess G. P. Regulatory properties of acetylcholine receptor: evidence for two different inhibitory sites, one for acetylcholine and the other for a noncompetitive inhibitor of receptor function (procaine). Biochemistry 1984; 23: 6889–6893
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sine S. M., Steinbach J. H. Agonists block currents through acetylcholine receptor channels. Biophysical Journal 1984; 46: 277–284
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takeyasu K., Shiono S., Udgaonkar J. B., Fujita N., Hess G. P. Acetylcholine receptor: characterization of the voltage-dependent regulatory (inhibitory) site for acetylcholine in membrane vesicles from Torpedo californica electroplax. Biochemistry 1986; 25: 1770–1776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeyasu K., Udgaonkar J. B., Hess G. P. Acetylcholine receptor: evidence for a voltage-dependent regulatory site for acetylcholine. Chemical kinetic measurements in membrane vesicles using a voltage clamp. Biochemistry 1983; 22: 5973–5978
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor P., Abramson S., Johnson D. A., Valenzuela C. F., Herz J. M. Distinctions in ligand binding sites on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1991; 625: 568–587
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tonner P. H., Wood S. C., Miller K. W. Can nicotine self-inhibition account for its low efficacy at the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo. Molecular Pharmacology 1992; 42: 890–897
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valenzuela C. F., Kerr J. A., Johnson D. A. Quinacrine binds to the lipid-protein interface of the Torpedo acetylcholine receptor. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1992; 267: 8238–8244
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Voges K-P., Jung G., Sawyer W. H. Depth-dependent fluorescent quenching of a tryptophan residue located at defined positions on a rigid 21-peptide helix in liposomes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1987; 896: 64–76
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White B. J., Cohen J. B. Agonist-induced changes in the structure of the acetylcholine receptor M2 regions revealed by photoincorporation of an uncharged nicotinic noncompetitive antagonist. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1992; 267: 15770–15783
   PubMedGoogle Scholar