Improved soluble expression of the gene encoding amylolytic enzyme Amo45 by fusion with the mobile-loop-region of co-chaperonin GroES in Escherichia coli

References

• Altenbuchner J, Mattes R. 2005. Escherichia coli. In: Gellissen, G. ed.. Production of recombinant proteins. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, pp 7–43.
   Google Scholar
• Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Rancurel C, Bernard T, Lombard V, Henrissat B. 2009. The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D233–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly MI, Stevens PW, Stols L, Su SX, Tollaksen S, Giometti C, Joachimiak A. 2001. Expression of a highly toxic protein, Bax, in Escherichia coli by attachment of a leader peptide derived from the GroES cochaperone. Protein Expr Purif 22:422–429.
   Google Scholar
• Grantham R, Gautier C, Gouy M, Mercier R, Pave A. 1980. Codon catalog usage and the genome hypothesis. Nucleic Acids Res 8:r49–r62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartl FU. 1996. Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature 381:571–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartl FU, Hayer-Hartl M. 2002. Molecular chaperones in the cytosol: from nascent chain to folded protein. Science 295:1852–1858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwich AL, Fenton WA, Chapman E, Farr GW. 2007. Two families of chaperonin: physiology and mechanism. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 23:115–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikemura T. 1981. Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E. coli translational system. J Mol Biol 151:389–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labes A, Karlsson EN, Fridjonsson OH, Turner P, Hreggvidson GO, Kristjansson JK, Holst O, Schonheit P. 2008. Novel members of glycoside hydrolase family 13 derived from environmental DNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 1914–1921.
   Google Scholar
• Landry SJ, Zeilstra-Ryalls J, Fayet O, Georgopoulos C, Gierasch LM. 1993. Characterization of a functionally important mobile domain of GroES. Nature 364:255–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorentz K, Gutschow B, Renner F. 1999. Evaluation of a direct alpha-amylase assay using 2-chloro-4-nitrophenyl-alpha- D-maltotrioside. Clin Chem Lab Med 37:1053–1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishihara K, Kanemori M, Kitagawa M, Yanagi H, Yura T. 1998. Chaperone coexpression plasmids: differential and synergistic roles of DnaK-DnaJ-GrpE and GroEL-GroES in assisting folding of an allergen of Japanese cedar pollen, Cryj2, in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 1694–1699.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palomo M, Pijning T, Booiman T, Dobruchowska JM, van der Vlist J, Kralj S, Planas A, Loos K, Kamerling JP, Dijkstra BW, van der Maarel MJ, Dijkhuizen L, Leemhuis H. 2010. Thermus thermophilus glycoside hydrolase family 57 branching enzyme: crystal structure, mechanism of action, and products formed. J Biol Chem 286:3520–3530.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson A, Landry SJ, Georgopoulos C. 1998. The ins and outs of a molecular chaperone machine. Trends Biochem Sci 23:138–143.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson A, van der Vies SM, Keppel F, Taher A, Landry SJ, Georgopoulos C. 1999. Compensatory changes in GroEL/Gp31 affinity as a mechanism for allele-specific genetic interaction. J Biol Chem 274:52–58.
   Google Scholar
• Rose TM, Schultz ER, Henikoff JG, Pietrokovski S, McCallum CM, Henikoff S. 1998. Consensus-degenerate hybrid oligonucleotide primers for amplification of distantly related sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:1628–1635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Sigler PB, Xu Z, Rye HS, Burston SG, Fenton WA, Horwich AL. 1998. Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. Annu Rev Biochem 67:581–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumpp T, Wilms B, Altenbuchner J. 2000. Ein neues, L-Rhamnose-induzierbares Expressionssystem für Escherichia coli. Biospectrum 6:33–36.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas JG, Ayling A, Baneyx F. 1997. Molecular chaperones, folding catalysts, and the recovery of active recombinant proteins from E. coli. To fold or to refold. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 66:197–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner P, Labes A, Fridjonsson OH, Hreggvidson GO, Schonheit P, Kristjansson JK, Holst O, Karlsson EN. 2005. Two novel cyclodextrin-degrading enzymes isolated from thermophilic bacteria have similar domain structures but differ in oligomeric state and activity profile. J Biosci Bioeng 100:380–390.
   Google Scholar
• Waugh DS. 2005. Making the most of affinity tags. Trends Biotechnol 23:316–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegerer A, Sun T, Altenbuchner J. 2008. Optimization of an E. coli L-rhamnose-inducible expression vector: test of various genetic module combinations. BMC Biotechnol 8:2.
   Google Scholar
• Winn-Deen ES, David H, Sigler G, Chavez R. 1988. Development of a direct assay for alpha-amylase. Clin Chem 34:2005–2008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Horwich AL, Sigler PB. 1997. The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex. Nature 388:741–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanisch-Perron C, Vieira J, Messing J. 1985. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene 33:103–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar